[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Proxy Connect - connection reset

2014-04-25 Thread Vladimir-M. Obelic
Hello, I have a working setup with apache 2.2 server acting as a remote proxy. I'm using proxytunnel with two chained proxies: proxytunnel -q -X -p localproxy:8080 -r remoteproxy:443 -d destination:22 I had to apply a patch for SSL to work though:

FW: [users@httpd] Help with Virtual Hosting on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2014-04-25 Thread Roy Hinkelman - Technical Services
Is there a preferred way to set up vhosts on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu? When searching, I find conflicting ways of setting this up. This site, for 2.4, https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html , says to simply put the VirtualHost info into httpd.conf. FireFox says Unable to Connect

Re: FW: [users@httpd] Help with Virtual Hosting on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Roy Hinkelman - Technical Services r...@worldtradepress.com wrote: This site, for 2.4, https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html , says to simply put the VirtualHost info into httpd.conf. FireFox says Unable to Connect Missing a Listen directive,

[users@httpd] Apache Processes in Windows

2014-04-25 Thread Dino B.
Hi Apache experts, This is my first post to an Apache group, so please bear with me. I am also new to Apache in general. My understanding is that under windows, there should be only 2 httpd processes once I start my Apache server (version 2.2). One parent and one child. The child then spawns

FW: Re: FW: [users@httpd] Help with Virtual Hosting on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2014-04-25 Thread Roy Hinkelman - Technical Services
Thanks, that worked. I had multiple listen directives. I cleared httpd.conf ( tried some code and left it there accidentally ) and removed listen 80 from sites-available/example.com VHost settings Another thread advised the use of restart instead of reload in service apache2 restart, which

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Processes in Windows

2014-04-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Dino B. mypascal2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Apache experts, This is my first post to an Apache group, so please bear with me. I am also new to Apache in general. My understanding is that under windows, there should be only 2 httpd processes once I start my

[users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread venu thangalapally
Guys.. do we have a 32-bit and 64-bit apache 2.2.27 http server ? for soalris ? Regards Venu

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:40 PM, venu thangalapally when...@gmail.com wrote: Guys.. do we have a 32-bit and 64-bit apache 2.2.27 http server ? for soalris ? You can build it either way. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread venu thangalapally
can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information Regards Venu On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:40 PM, venu thangalapally

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:43 PM, venu thangalapally when...@gmail.com wrote: can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information The bit level is not really a property of source code. You'll have to

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:43 PM, venu thangalapally when...@gmail.comwrote: can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information Build apr, apr-util, and httpd with CC=cc -m64 ./configure ... Replace cc

[users@httpd] Re: Conditional response body modification

2014-04-25 Thread Doug Strick
I wasn't able to come up with anything further on the mod_ext_filter solution. I did come across mod_parp http://parp.sourceforge.net ( http://parp.sourceforge.net). It says it's able to parse the request data and make it available to other apache modules. I've gotten it compiled and enabled on

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Conditional response body modification

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
Anyone have any ideas how I can make the HTTP_COOKIE data available to mod_substitute? Let me know if I'm completely off base here in understanding what this module can do as well. Thanks In 2.4, it seems like you should be able to register mod_substitute via mod_filter. mod_filter has a

[users@httpd] Re: Conditional response body modification

2014-04-25 Thread Doug Strick
In 2.4, it seems like you should be able to register mod_substitute via mod_filter. mod_filter has a match parameter that in 2.4 is an ap_expr expression, so it can ready basically anything floating around in the server. mod_filter can be pretty intimidating though. I really wish I could

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Jesus Cea
On 25/04/14 22:48, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:43 PM, venu thangalapally when...@gmail.com wrote: can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information The bit level is not really a

[users@httpd] Apache Admin button on XAMPP Control Panel for non-80 port

2014-04-25 Thread Carl Hruska
Hello everyone, I have a small problem with the Admin button on the XAMPP Control Panel. Please read the following information pertaining to this problem and reply with suggestions (any suggestions; I'm not afraid to research.). Any help will be greatly appreciated. THE PROBLEM: The problem

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Brett @Google
In addition, it is also useful to add -xarch=native and -xcode=pic32 to CFLAGS -xcode=pic32 helps linking with .so libraries which are not solaris-savvy (the equivalent of linux's -G / -fPIC) -xarch=native will optimise the code for the same machine it is compiling on (good if all your machines