Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 21:11 -0700, Kurtis Rader wrote: > > I'm going to assume that by "single process" you meant "single user". If you read the docs, you'll find single process mode described ("httpd -X"). It has nothing to do with single user. I regularly run it in single-process mode for

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

I may be wrong, but I believe you are looking for this (to keep apache attached to the shell): http://zroger.com/blog/apache-in-the-foreground/ You could also take a look at this, as it may already be taking care of what you seem to be looking for:

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all the items on the command line ultimately used by apachectl? For example, when I do the following, it fails - I assume I'm missing something. $ source /etc/apache2/envvars $ /usr/sbin/apache2 -f

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

You probably have envvars set by your init scripts to define a bunch of variables used in sections in your conf. On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:26 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all > the items on the command

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

Is it possible (or inadvisable) to run apache using the /usr/sbin/apache binary directly? Is there any significant production issues that might arise? On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:26 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > I appreciate your feedback. I apologize for providing additional

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

I hadn't thought of the fact that apache would be architected to use its multiple threads as an internal housekeeping (instead of just to allow parallelization of requests). My motivation behind moving the processes to be so low is that I'm trying to explore Apache's suitability for use in a

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:26 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > I appreciate your feedback. I apologize for providing additional context > about my question, I won't do that in the future. > No need to apologize. It just sounded like you were asking for advice about making a

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

Unfortunately, no joy (this is using apachectl, not /usr/sbin/apache) :( root 339 0.0 0.0 8868 904 ?S+ 02:38 0:00 \_ grep --color=auto apache root 1 0.0 0.0 4448 780 ?Ss Oct25 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/apache2ctl -DFOREGROUND -DNO_DETACH root

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:55 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > Is it possible (or inadvisable) to run apache using the /usr/sbin/apache > binary directly? Is there any significant production issues that might > arise? > Run the binary directly as opposed to what? If you mean via

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

Thanks for all the help all! I dug into the apachectl and realized I was using the config file in sites-enabled, instead of the top level /etc/apache2/apache.conf file. The latter file installs all the modules in /mods-enabled, which is what was missing. (for the curious, I also had to copy all

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

I appreciate your feedback. I apologize for providing additional context about my question, I won't do that in the future. All I'm looking to do is run Apache in single threaded non-forking mode, and output all its output to stdio/stderr. I thought that some folks on this list might have done

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

You could try starting the service and run "ps auxf | grep apache". This doesn't always give you all the information, but it could help. - Y On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:26 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all > the items on the command line ultimately used by apachectl? For example, > when I do the following, it fails - I assume I'm missing

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Aronchick wrote: > Thanks for all the help all! I dug into the apachectl and realized I was > using the config file in sites-enabled, instead of the top level > /etc/apache2/apache.conf file. The latter file installs all the modules in

Re: [users@httpd] Persistent proxied connections with Apache 2.4.x?

From: o haya To: "users@httpd.apache.org" ; o haya Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 8:03 PM Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Persistent proxied connections with Apache 2.4.x? From: o haya

Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker Container?

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 21:11 -0700, Kurtis Rader wrote: > > I'm going to assume that by "single process" you meant "single user". > > If you read the docs, you'll find single process mode > described ("httpd -X"). It has