Re: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)?

2020-10-03 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 13:46 Scott A. Wozny wrote: > Sounds like a job for AJAX, but before throwing out the baby with the bath > water I'd seriously consider turning up logging with timestamps on your > existing CGI and > That's a good idea, Scott, I've just been too lazy and debugging CGI is

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)?

2020-10-03 Thread Scott A. Wozny
Sounds like a job for AJAX, but before throwing out the baby with the bath water I'd seriously consider turning up logging with timestamps on your existing CGI and seeing if SSI is a loser in its entirety or if it's one specific part of the process that is tanking your page load times that you

[users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)?

2020-10-03 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:18 Tom Browder wrote: > I have been using server side includes since I started my websites on Apache ... > Any suggestions for SSI replacement with a more asynchronous method? Let me be more specific about the data flow I'm using with the landing (home) page of my

[users@httpd] Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)?

2020-10-03 Thread Tom Browder
I have been using server side includes since I started my websites on Apache about 10 years ago. The performance hit I'm getting is too high and I would like to get the same utility with something more modern and appropriate. What I have been doing with SSI is executing some fairly involved db