[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 | "require" and AuthMerging

Dear Apache community, we just wonder why when using the following configuration: # allow using the "/" directory of this virtual host by all Require all granted Alias /fslogs /opt/wcms/fs4/log IndexIgnore .. fs4.pid fs-wrapper.log fs-gc.log IndexOptions +FancyIndexing Options

[users@httpd] Apache2 2.4.6 | ConnectionPool separation/isolation

Dear Apache2 community, we observed, that Apache2 shares configured connection pools (whether based on "worker" or "prefork") over all available virtual hosts. This is really poor as one single heavily used virtual host might consume all reserved connections and in consequence influence the oth

[users@httpd] Apache2 and Tomcat load balancing | Timeouts: request, connection, cping/cpong

Dear Apache2 community, having installed Apache2 2.4.3 in combination with: * mod_proxy_balancer (not "mod_jk"!) * mod_proxy_ajp * mod_proxy and the following virtual host configuration content: ... BalancerMember ajp://rb-wcmstc1.xx.x.xxx:8010 loadfactor=50 ping=5 retry=10 route=

[users@httpd] Apache2 and Tomcat load balancing | Timeouts: request, connection, cping/cpong

Dear Apache2 community, having installed Apache2 2.4.3 in combination with: - mod_proxy_balancer (not "mod_jk"!) - mod_proxy_ajp - mod_proxy and the following virtual host configuration: BalancerMember ajp://rb-wcmstc1.de.bosch.com:8010 loadfactor=50 ping=5 retry=10 route=rb-w

[users@httpd] Apache2 2.2.22 | mod_proxy_ajp | Workers in ERROR state on single long running request | Bug-fix

Dear Apache2 community, with an important bug fix in "mod_proxy_ajp" of Apache 2.2.22 (see http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.2.22), a problem marking an AJP-worker (used for communication between Apache and Tomcat) in error state when a single long running request occurred, should have

[users@httpd] FW: TimeOut expired | Multiple Balancers using multiple workers | Apache 2.2.17

avaclient_over_http". So, it seems to be the only solution to really separate both by specifying unique BalancerMembers (using unique "route"-names). The consequence: the tomcat configuration has to be adapted as well. Do you agree? From: King Holge

[users@httpd] TimeOut expired | Multiple Balancers using multiple workers | Apache 2.2.17

Hi group, we have the following topology up and running: Apache2 (works as load-balancer) | | Tomcat1Tomcat2 (rb-wcmstc1) (rb-wcmstc2) using the following TWO balancers named "fs4_javaclient_over_http" and "fs4_webclient_over_http" specifying DIFFERENT TIMEO

[us...@httpd] Apache2 | One Virtualhost for 80 AND 443

Hi Apache2 group, is there a possibility to use JUST one VirtualHost for accessing it via HTTP and HTTPS. To my understanding, this is not possible because "SSLEngine on" just forces the HTTP- access to work just with HTTPS: NameVirtualHost *:80 NameVirtualHost *:443 ... SSLEngine on

[us...@httpd] Apache2 | mod_ssl

Hi Apache2 community, when enabling SSL for Apache2 we get an error during startup telling us, the private key could not be found: [Tue Nov 23 20:04:53 2010] [error] Init: Private key not found [Tue Nov 23 20:04:53 2010] [error] SSL Library Error: 218710120 error:0D094068:asn1 encoding routines:

[us...@httpd] "mod_proxy" | bundling | timeout | connection losts

Hi Apache2 professionals, we identified the following problem when using "mod_proxy_ajp" in combination with a balancer configuration (see detailed configuration below), that: - multiple HTTP requests seem to use the SAME AJP "CHANNEL" - when just ONE request is exceeding the configured "ProxySet

[us...@httpd] "mod_proxy_ajp" | timeout | connection losts

Hi Apache2 professionals, we identified the following problem when using "mod_proxy_ajp" in combination with a balancer configuration (see detailed configuration below), that: - multiple HTTP requests seem to use the SAME AJP "CHANNEL" - when just ONE request is exceeding the configured "ProxySet

[us...@httpd] "mod_proxy_ajp" | errors

Hi all, when using "mod_proxy_ajp" of Apache2 2.2.16 in combination with two Apache Tomcat 6.0.29 servlet containers, we often see the following entries within the Apache2 error log of the virtual host: [Thu Nov 25 16:17:26 2010] [error] ajp_read_header: ajp_ilink_receive failed [Thu Nov 25 16:17

RE: [us...@httpd] "proxy_balancer" | stickysession

D=B3C4AABB5F983A0E9D6478C42C88A5C4.rb-wcmstc1; Path=/" This POST throws a 500 status code. -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Freitag, 15. Oktober 2010 10:58 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] "proxy_balancer"

RE: [us...@httpd] "proxy_balancer" | stickysession

ot; can be excluded (according to the tomcat GC-logs)! The whole proxy balancer configuration you can see below. We wonder: - why does it happen, although "rb-wcmstc2" seems to be physically available? - how to determine the root-cause? Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Rainer

RE: [us...@httpd] "proxy_balancer" | stickysession

, why that happens on Apache2-side? How? Kind regards, Holger -Original Message- From: Thomas [mailto:apache.org-li...@darkwhole.de] Sent: Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 23:31 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] "proxy_balancer" | stickysession Hi Holger, On 0

[us...@httpd] "proxy_balancer" | stickysession

Dear mailing list, currently, we use the Apache2 version: - Apache2 2.2.16 64bit - standard "mod_proxy_balancer" module with the following V-HOST configuration including a proxy balancer directive (with two Apache Tomcat instances behind): BalancerMember ajp://rb-wcmstc1.xx.x.xxx:8009 l