On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:32:17 -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Tom Evanstevans...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 00:31 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
I propose this upgrade to Apache:
Options +NoDNS
I think your mailer dropped your patch, can
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:57:45 -0700, Aaron Turner wrote:
[...]
I believe Eric was agreeing with Tom's sentiment. Ie: If you think
this is worthwhile, please feel free to submit a patch adding this
feature.
Since I have not looked at Apache source code, for me
this would be at least several
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:50:17 +0200, Krist van Besien wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Mike -- EMAIL
IGNOREDm_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
One additional but important point. When things slowed substantially
after adding SSL to part of my tree, everything slowed, even the parts
I propose this upgrade to Apache:
Options +NoDNS
Prevents Apache from initiating DNS activity for
any reason.
I am now running my server with all DNS blocked
by iptables. Performance is thereby substantially
improved. Fortunately, I usually don't need DNS
for anything else on that box.
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:40:55 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
Thanks for the reply Krist,
Let me give you a little background on what I did (and still doing). I
created a video training software that is now internet based. Nothing
inside of the training needs to be across HTTPS, except the
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:08:27 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
No, my understanding is login's weren't encrypted unless SSL was used.
Scott, I'm not a sysadmin, but does win2k3 server have something like
iptables? That MIGHT be a little more helpful, I'll have to research it
more, however, I
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:46:35 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
Mike,
If it was up to me, I wouldn't use a Windows based server either,
however, what the client bought is what I had to use. KWIM? I can't
block DNS on this server due to it having a .com tied to it. I looked
this afternoon and no
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:59:34 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:46:35 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
Mike,
If it was up to me, I wouldn't use a Windows based server either,
however, what the client bought is what I had to use. KWIM? I can't
block DNS on this server
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:22:14 +0200, André Warnier wrote:
[...]
You could first check the obvious, such as whether in your Apache/Centos
config, you are not *asking* the server to do these DNS lookups. Look
here for instance :
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_log_config.html#formats
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:24:25 +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
HostNameLookups
HostNameLookups Off
in the only place it appears. Perhaps I should
compare all files in conf.d on my two machines.
Mike.
-
The official User-To-User
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:00:54 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:24:25 +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
HostNameLookups
HostNameLookups Off
in the only place it appears. Perhaps I should compare all files in
conf.d on my two machines.
Mike.
[...]
I did the comparison
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:43:14 +0200, André Warnier wrote:
[...]
Yet one appears to do tons of DNS lookups, and the other one not. Logic
would have it that there /is/ something different somewhere in either
the configuration, or some file(s) you are not thinking about right now,
that make the
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:06:34 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Later examination showed that the Fedora box (the one working well)
occasionally also does a DNS lookup, but it happens very rapidly. All
the DNS activity is the same -- it is doing a reverse lookup on the
client IP address
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:33:12 -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
Local DNS cache of some sort on the Fedora box? Some of my hosts run
'nscd' (which comes with glibc) and some run BIND in cache-only mode.
Indeed there are two problems, and you nailed one of them:
1. Both boxes have nscd, but it was
I just deployed by web site modified so that some
parts use SSL. On testing on my LAN, response
is very fast. However testing with the internet,
response is very slow, even for those parts of
my web site that to not use SSL. I checked by
temporarily switching back to the old
configuration, and
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:15:55 -0700, Jonathan Zuckerman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Mike -- EMAIL
[...]
SSL should go slower, but not on pages that don't use it. Are you
absolutely certain that the pages that don't require SSL are not using
it?
[...]
Pretty sure -- different
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:48:46 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:15:55 -0700, Jonathan Zuckerman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Mike -- EMAIL
[...]
SSL should go slower, but not on pages that don't use it. Are you
absolutely certain that the pages
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:21:40 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
[...]
Additional tests show that:
With httpd-2.2.8-1.fc7: works well.
With httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2: excessive DNS, much too slow.
Any thoughts?
Mike
My web server is a CentOS box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue
Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
root ~]# rpm -q httpd
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2
My development and standby is on a Fedora box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Any recommendations for a domain name registry
service that will also forward e-mail? Speedy
and reliable forwarding is a virtue.
Thanks,
Mike.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See
Running Apache 2.2 on Fedora 7, I have an environment
variable that is needed in a RewriteCond as well as
elsewhere in a bash script. I would rather not set
it in two places.
Now I was setting it in /etc/bashrc, but it did not
work because, as I just learned, bashrc environment
variables are not
I have several VirtualHost and numerous Directory
sections that have large sets of identical directives.
If there a way to define a subroutine in httpd.config
that can be called in these sections?
Thanks for your help.
Mike.
-
I am thinking of securing part of my low volume
web site with SSL. I wend to some certificate
authorities, and I was blown away by the prices.
Are there that are both cheap and widely recognized?
Thanks for your help.
Mike.
-
I have some environment variables I want to provide in a file.
For example, in bash the file would contain:
export var1=a b c
export var2=1 2 3
I would like to include or source this file in my
html.config, so var1 and var2 will be available to
mod_rewrite as environment variables.
How can
I have (set in /etc/bashrc):
echo $HTML_TST
aa|bb|cc|dd|ee
and I tried:
RewriteCond ee %{ENV:HTML_TST}
following the documentation that says:
Syntax: RewriteCond TestString CondPattern
I expected ee to be recognized as one ofthe alternatives
in the pattern. It didn't work.
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:33:09 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
I have (set in /etc/bashrc):
echo $HTML_TST
aa|bb|cc|dd|ee
and I tried:
RewriteCond ee %{ENV:HTML_TST}
following the documentation that says:
Syntax: RewriteCond TestString CondPattern
I expected ee
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:37:53 +0200, André Warnier wrote:
[...]
What are you really trying to do ?
Can you give a real example ?
If you want to use the values of shell-level environment variables, then
presumably you set these environment variables somewhere, before you
invoke the script
On my website I have a BMP picture that is 13x20 pixels.
I want it displayed as a matrix of little squares.
Displaying on Win2k with IE or Firefox, and on WinXP
using IE, that is what I get. But on WinXP with Firefox,
the picture is smoothed into a blurry mess. Is there
a way to I prevent this?
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:07:58 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On my website I have a BMP picture that is 13x20 pixels. I want it
displayed as a matrix of little squares. Displaying on Win2k with IE or
Firefox, and on WinXP using IE, that is what I get
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:57:59 -0700, Dragon wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED did speak thusly:
On my website I have a BMP picture that is 13x20 pixels. I want it
displayed as a matrix of little squares. Displaying on Win2k with IE or
Firefox, and on WinXP using IE, that is what I get. But on WinXP
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:40:09 -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
Give a link to an example.
[...]
http://www.rosemike.net/photo/photo.html
and look on the picture on the left.
Mike.
-
The official User-To-User support
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:46:43 -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
Not really sure what you are trying to do but you are using a bmp image
that is 13x20 pixels and instructing the browser to display it 200
pixels wide.
It's up to the browser to determine how to render the image file.
Some of
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:08:08 -0500, Justin Pasher wrote:
[...]
I assume you are using Firefox 3 when viewing the page. FF3 has a new
feature for automatically antialiasing images when they are resized.
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23t=664257
At this time, you cannot turn
In the httpd.conf fragment below, I want jack and
jane to have access to base, but only jack to
have access to child. However, I find that
jane has access to child How can i block this?
Thanks for your help,
Mike.
btw:
$ rpm -q httpd
httpd-2.2.4-4.1.fc7
Directory /var/www/html/www/base
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:13:37 -0700, Peter Milanese wrote:
Try reversing those Directory segments.
It looks like it approves it before it hits the 'child' segment.
htmlheadstyle type=text/css!-- DIV {margin:0px;}
--/style/headbodydiv style=font-family:times new roman,
[...]
My apologies for noise. The problem was a typo.
Mike.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Linux FC4 with Apache 2.0, I have constructed
a backend server for my reverse proxy. I would
prefer not to put it in /var, to avoid confusion
with test operations on the same box. Is there
a conventional place for this? For example, I
notice that /srv is empty.
Thanks for your advice.
Mike.
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:25:34 +0200, Josiane BERNILLON wrote:
[...]
I think it's true, but I never use it and could't help you on this topic.
I just give you a quick way to free space on your BoxA disk without
reconfiguring your Apaches servers
--
Josiane
This is good, but in my case,
I have two boxes on my intranet each running
Apache 2.0 under FC4. My Linksys firewall directs
port 80 to BoxA. Both boxes are also running
iptables, including libipq.
BoxA has my html tree. I have a number of .jpg
files, some as large as 10 meg. The various
directories containing the .html
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:35:03 +0200, Josiane BERNILLON wrote:
Mike - EMAIL IGNORED a écrit :
I have two boxes on my intranet each running
Apache 2.0 under FC4. My Linksys firewall directs
port 80 to BoxA. Both boxes are also running
iptables, including libipq.
BoxA has my html tree. I
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:33:46 +0100, Pid wrote:
Mike - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:42:33 -0600, David Salisbury wrote:
[...]
The occasional appearance of #ZZZ in my logs therefore still remains
a mystery. By the way, I can duplicate it if I use nc on another
Linux box
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:42:33 -0600, David Salisbury wrote:
[...]
Additionally, I wonder why the #ZZZ appeared in the first place.
a bug in the client I guess, I've seen this problem in some proxy server's
mailing list...
I would guess all that happened was the user bookmarked the page
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:08:10 +0200, Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike -
EMAIL IGNORED
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:21 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: /my.html#mySection
Linux mbrc20 2.6.14
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:05:42 +0200, Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike -
EMAIL IGNORED
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 4:09 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /my.html#mySection
I have seen in several
I have seen in several browsers that requests such as
http://www.xxx.net/my.html#mySection
get to the server without the #mySection . The page
is delivered and the #mySection is resolved locally
by the browser, as would seem to be appropriate.
Now my CGI does not know about #mySection. If
On one of my directories, I have:
Options -All SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Indexes
and there is a large tree accessible thereby.
I see, however, that the log does not record
any directory or file access utilizing the
Indexes option. Is there a way to make this
happen?
Thanks for your help,
Mike.
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:16:46 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 6/14/06, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On one of my directories, I have:
Options -All SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Indexes
The -All is redundant. See the documentation of the Options
directive. It starts by resetting
47 matches
Mail list logo
