Re: [users@httpd] Which module is affected by the Range header issue?

2011-09-27 Thread Steve Foster
anyone? cheers.. On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Steve Foster stephenfoster1...@gmail.comwrote: All, did anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this? cheers Steve On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Steve Foster stephenfoster1...@gmail.com wrote: i've also had a thought, I also

Re: [users@httpd] Which module is affected by the Range header issue?

2011-09-08 Thread Steve Foster
All, did anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this? cheers Steve On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Steve Foster stephenfoster1...@gmail.comwrote: i've also had a thought, I also implemented the following: LimitRequestLine 4000 Which is about half of the default size i beleive, could

Re: [users@httpd] Which module is affected by the Range header issue?

2011-08-31 Thread Steve Foster
Steve On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Steve Foster stephenfoster1...@gmail.comwrote: Correction , the static file gives a 206 status code...

[users@httpd] Which module is affected by the Range header issue?

2011-08-30 Thread Steve Foster
hi there, I have multiple versions of Apache, all built with minimal inclusions of modules in the core binary , they don't exhibit the memory consumption issue when attacked with the killapache script, they all run happily for hours with no resource issues. Does anyone know which particular

Re: [users@httpd] Which module is affected by the Range header issue?

2011-08-30 Thread Steve Foster
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: It's tuff baked into the core binary, httpd. Note that many dynamic responses can't be satisfied as range requests, so maybe your / is such a response. Hi eric, sorry i was referring to the compiled-in modules, e.g:

Re: [users@httpd] Which module is affected by the Range header issue?

2011-08-30 Thread Steve Foster
Hi eric, yes i have tried it on a static file as well and no issues., obviously the static file gives a 200 status code back in the logs, but i am still sending the Range header as per the kill script. Steve On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: When you

Re: [users@httpd] Which module is affected by the Range header issue?

2011-08-30 Thread Steve Foster
Correction , the static file gives a 206 status code... On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Steve Foster stephenfoster1...@gmail.comwrote: Hi eric, yes i have tried it on a static file as well and no issues., obviously the static file gives a 200 status code back in the logs, but i am still

[users@httpd] Centralised logging for access logs.

2011-05-20 Thread Steve Foster
Hi there, I am looking at ways i can more reliably centralise apache access logs into a single logging area, i have discounted syslog on the basis of reliabilty and the sheer volume of log entries i need to handle. I am canvassing opinion on what others who maintain large configurations might

[users@httpd] Rotatelogs and british summertime.

2011-04-06 Thread Steve Foster
Hi there, I have a slight issue with rotatelogs and british summer and wintertime. When in BST my logfile entries are being written with the correct timestamp (localised) but the logfile rotation filename does not match the current time, e.g i set my logfile name as

Re: [users@httpd] Rotatelogs and british summertime.

2011-04-06 Thread Steve Foster
...@twistfare.bewrote: hey Steve, didn't know you guys have summers in Britain ?! ;-) I would guess your Apache is started either from CRON or in any case from a startup script that didn't have the right TZ environment variable set. Rob Citeren Steve Foster stephenfoster1...@gmail.com: Hi there, I have

Re: [users@httpd] Rotatelogs and british summertime.

2011-04-06 Thread Steve Foster
You would assume so, but the guidance in the documentation says the following: Causes the use of local time rather than GMT as the base for the interval or for strftime(3) formatting with size-based rotation. Note that using -lin an environment which changes the GMT offset (such as for BST or