RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem serving large files

2008-09-11 Thread Wilda, Jet
Could it be that you have SELinux enabled and it is messing with you? ~Jet From: John LaCour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:03 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem serving large files I'd

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to get SSL handshake errors logged

2008-08-14 Thread Wilda, Jet
Hi, How do I get Apache httpd (2.0.X and 2.2.X) to log SSL handshake errors? I found that if I set ‘LogLevel info’ they will be logged to the error log. However it then logs way to much stuff. What I need is a way to just log all the SSL errors especially the handshake errors.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to get SSL handshake errors logged

2008-08-14 Thread Wilda, Jet
To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to get SSL handshake errors logged Wilda, Jet wrote: Hi, How do I get Apache httpd (2.0.X and 2.2.X) to log SSL handshake errors? I found that if I set ‘LogLevel info’ they will be logged to the error log. However

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Packet debugging when using mod_ssl

2008-06-18 Thread Wilda, Jet
Hi, We use ssldump http://www.rtfm.com/ssldump/ to do that sort of thing. Though you may need to disable some of the cipher suites (found that diffie-hellman doesn't work). ~Jet -Original Message- From: Ian Lord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:48 AM

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diffeerent Apache Daemon on RHEL5.1

2008-06-04 Thread Wilda, Jet
Hi, We basically do approach1, however you will also need to make a copy of the binary if you truly want separate daemons. ~Jet From: Vinay Purohit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:36 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diffeerent Apache Daemon on RHEL5.1

2008-06-04 Thread Wilda, Jet
@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diffeerent Apache Daemon on RHEL5.1 Thanks Jet. Can you please explain in bit more detail i.e. what do you mean by you will also need to make a copy of the binary if you truly want separate daemons \Vinay -Original Message- From: Wilda, Jet [mailto

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to start multiple apache daemon in apache 2.2.8 on RHEL 5.1

2008-05-06 Thread Wilda, Jet
. \Vinay -Original Message- From: Wilda, Jet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 11:40 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE:How to start apache daemon in apache 2.2.8 on RHEL 5.1 I'm not familiar with the Windows side, however it is effectively

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE:How to start apache daemon in apache 2.2.8 on RHEL 5.1

2008-05-02 Thread Wilda, Jet
as a different daemon which can be started and stoped without affecting others ? Is it same as running IP based virtual server (apache3.3.8 service/daemon) on windows ?   \Vinay   From: Wilda, Jet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 5/2/2008 11:15 PM To: users

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] High availability concept question

2008-04-30 Thread Wilda, Jet
We use F5 BIG-IP LTM http://www.f5.com/products/big-ip/product-modules/local-traffic-manager. html though there are many options including the open source pound http://www.apsis.ch/pound/. Enjoy, ~Jet From: Adam Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] modify Host header

2008-03-28 Thread Wilda, Jet
Try RequestHeader set Host %{SERVER_NAME}:443 ~Jet From: Eqbal Z [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:01 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] modify Host header I need to modify the Host header for my

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] using non-standard SSL ports

2008-03-27 Thread Wilda, Jet
I think the bigger issue is that you certificate will be for 1 FQDN i.e. sample.com and hitting with any other FQDN will pop up a window saying the certificate and servername don't match. ~Jet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] using non-standard SSL ports

2008-03-27 Thread Wilda, Jet
I see. Thanks, ~Jet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:01 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] using non-standard SSL ports On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Wilda, Jet

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xx.com opens but xx.com doesnt

2008-03-19 Thread Wilda, Jet
Do you have ServerAlias xx.com set in your VHOST? ~Jet -Original Message- From: James Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:03 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xx.com opens but xx.com doesnt This might be more of a DNS question,

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-18 Thread Wilda, Jet
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ? On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: Fixed it for the /saleslead vs /salesleadv2. What does having or not having the trailing slash change or mean? Apache will match everything to the right

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
I'm guessing that no one else is running 2.2.8 as a reverse proxy? ~Jet -Original Message- From: Wilda, Jet Hi, I just compiled Apache httpd 2.2.8 on RedHat 4.6 with kernel 2.6.9-67.ELsmp i686. I started it up using my configuration files from our 2.0.61 (changed

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
by another worker ? On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: I'm guessing that no one else is running 2.2.8 as a reverse proxy? I am not, but: ProxyPass /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPassReverse /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPass /salesleadv2 http

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
that If I replace it by .../saleslead then it would not reach to application. Any way if think its important then check it, it sometimes very necessary. Narendra -Original Message- From: Wilda, Jet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:43 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wilda, Jet
/salesleadv2 http://172.17.52.28:8091/salesleadv2 Try it. -Original Message- From: Wilda, Jet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:56 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-14 Thread Wilda, Jet
Hi, I just compiled Apache httpd 2.2.8 on RedHat 4.6 with kernel 2.6.9-67.ELsmp i686. I started it up using my configuration files from our 2.0.61 (changed the LoadModule statements to use the new names for the ones that changed) and now I get [EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# service phttpd