I see.

Thanks,
~Jet

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua
Slive
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:01 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] using non-standard SSL ports

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Wilda, Jet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the bigger issue is that you certificate will be for 1 FQDN
i.e.
>  sample.com and hitting with any other FQDN will pop up a window
saying
>  the certificate and servername don't match.

No, he can supply a different certificate for each port. Port-based
and IP-based virtual hosting are almost-identical from an application
perspective. It is name-based virtual hosting that causes problems.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------
Learn more about Chase Paymentech Solutions,LLC payment processing services at 
www.chasepaymentech.com.

THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL.  This e-mail message and any attachments are 
proprietary and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not 
print, distribute, or copy this message or any attachments.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail 
and delete this message and any attachments from your computer.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to