Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Control : Starting and Stopping Apache from foreign application

2008-09-19 Thread Foo JH
If all you wand to do is start and stop the Apache service, why don't you simply do the following on the command line: net start Apache2 net stop Apache2 Asif M wrote: Hi all, I have the following problem :- I wrote a Apache Control Program in Visual Studio 2003, which does the following 1.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for Windows based commercial LAMP setup

2007-11-12 Thread Foo JH
Does anyone know the actual status of HTTPD on Windows as a production server? I know lots of people use it, but I have seen articles (and so have others in the company) which suggest it is designed as a development platform, and not really intended as a production ready server. Windows +

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] started windows service with SSL

2007-06-06 Thread Foo JH
Very good tip. Thanks for sharing. apache -k config -D SSL Or just upgrade to 2.2 where the silly -D SSL thing is gone. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?

2007-05-30 Thread Foo JH
I'm running it with both PHP5 and mod_perl, without any problems, and I am using the binary (no recompile here, no M$ visual studio) A success story! Perhaps you can share with me your setup process: 1. Are you installing from WAMP, or via direct binary download from Apache? 2. Are you using

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?

2007-05-29 Thread Foo JH
Hello all, I've been using Apache 2.2 for Win32 (with modperl) for some time. But one thing bugs me quite often. That is: once in a while (quite randomly), Apache will produce the following error: [Mon Mar 05 21:19:47 2007] [notice] Parent: child process exited with status 3221225477 --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?

2007-05-29 Thread Foo JH
Hey Sam, Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o any PHP/ modperl addons? Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server is running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has been up over six months! I have never seen anything such as that exit

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?

2007-05-29 Thread Foo JH
Hello morgan, Ya Know, i have an apache WAMP5 box runnin on xp home too! and other than net downtime and power outages, its been up ~3mo! i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version. Yes I am enjoying Apache

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (c lient socket)

2006-05-19 Thread jh
I've spent hours googling and asked about this error message on a PHP list and was directed here. Every time I gracefully restart Apache 2.2.2, the error log reports: [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [error] (9)Bad file

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socke t_accept: (client socket)

2006-05-19 Thread jh
Could you tell me a little more about your setup? Kernel, CPU (32-bit or 64-bit), filesystem (ReiserFS or ?), compiler version, etc.? Are you running 2.2.2? I'd really appreciate knowing. I'm digging into this, one way or another. If it were just an occassional error message, I might ignore