I'm running it with both PHP5 and mod_perl, without any problems, and
I am using the binary (no recompile here, no M$ visual studio)
A success story! Perhaps you can share with me your setup process:
1. Are you installing from WAMP, or via direct binary download from Apache?
2. Are you using
Foo JH wrote:
I'm running it with both PHP5 and mod_perl, without any problems, and
I am using the binary (no recompile here, no M$ visual studio)
A success story! Perhaps you can share with me your setup process:
1. Are you installing from WAMP, or via direct binary download from
I'm running Apache 2.2.4 with PHP 5 to enable my blog, and it's been
very stable since I installed it in April. The only beef I have is its
tendency to keep slowly sucking RAM as the days roll by, so I've been
resorting to restarting it on occasion to keep the usage low. I don't
know if it's
--- Mark A. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.2.4 with PHP 5 to enable my
blog, and it's been
very stable since I installed it in April. The only
beef I have is its
tendency to keep slowly sucking RAM as the days roll
by, so I've been
resorting to restarting it on
- Original Message -
From: Jess Holle
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
morgan gangwere wrote:
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
morgan gangwere wrote:
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
running something like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Note that
--- morgan gangwere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morgan,
~snip~
I have seen this with the mySQL connectivity in PHP
- but its usually
caused by NOT closing the connection to the MySQL
server after you're done.
This is what I was referring to in my persistent
connections comment, but it can
Hello all,
I've been using Apache 2.2 for Win32 (with modperl) for some time. But
one thing bugs me quite often. That is: once in a while (quite
randomly), Apache will produce the following error:
[Mon Mar 05 21:19:47 2007] [notice] Parent: child process exited with
status 3221225477 --
Foo JH wrote:
Hello all,
I've been using Apache 2.2 for Win32 (with modperl) for some time. But
one thing bugs me quite often. That is: once in a while (quite
randomly), Apache will produce the following error:
[Mon Mar 05 21:19:47 2007] [notice] Parent: child process exited with
status
Hey Sam,
Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o any
PHP/ modperl addons?
Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server is
running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has been up over six
months! I have never seen anything such as that exit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Foo JH wrote:
Hey Sam,
Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o any
PHP/ modperl addons?
Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server is
running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has been up
Hello morgan,
Ya Know, i have an apache WAMP5 box runnin on xp home too! and other
than net downtime and power outages, its been up ~3mo!
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Yes I am enjoying Apache
Foo JH wrote:
Hey Sam,
Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o
any PHP/ modperl addons?
Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server
is running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has been up over six
months! I have never seen anything
morgan gangwere wrote:
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2000,
the flaw of resolving all clients as 0.0.0.0 - disable win32
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
morgan gangwere wrote:
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2000,
the flaw of resolving all
Jess Holle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
morgan gangwere wrote:
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2000,
the flaw
16 matches
Mail list logo
