I'm running a couple Redhat servers with Apache 1.3.36 (which my company is
sticking with for legacy reasons; I'm sure we'll move to 2.0 or 2.2
eventually, but everyone here other than me has only used 1.3). It's a
typical LAMP setup. There's about 250 virtual hosts on a handful of IPs on
the
Hi Mike,
Well, the above LAMP configuration is way under this, built from
dust-covered parts picked out from the trash, and it's hard to find 2 gig
memory in the trash... :)
About the main question, having 250 different logfiles is not a number
that a usual webserver would cry about, even if it
Apart from certain usage - like MP3 or video streaming on a 100 or
1000Mbps line -, the bottleneck is not the disk subsystem, but the CPU is,
the average load of 2 also shows this. Using a RAID1 array also decreases
stress on the disks, the 4.5% iowait avg is not an issue - and logging
into
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:09:00PM CDT, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: We currently log all the virtual host activity to individual log files.
: Would it be more efficient to log to single logfile that's later split for
: each vhost? Or would that make the disk utilization worse? Or
