Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mass Virtual Hosting

2007-09-11 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I'm trying to think of an optimal mass vhosting solution for my server. But even after reading http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/mass.html and http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_vhost_alias.html I couldn't make up my mind

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mass Virtual Hosting

2007-09-10 Thread pavel . stratil-jun
Hi! I'm trying to think of an optimal mass vhosting solution for my server. But even after reading http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/mass.html and http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_vhost_alias.html I couldn't make up my mind and have actually more questions then aswers. Here they

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting

2005-08-29 Thread Isabelle Moullet
with NameVirtualHost 130.223.27.40:* and replace VirtualHost 130.223.27.40 with VirtualHost 130.223.27.40:* -ascs -Original Message- From: Isabelle Moullet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:42 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting

2005-08-29 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting I already tried that.. No way.. same problem. Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit : That is because you do not have any NameVirtualHost definition for 130.223.27.40:8080. However 130.223.27.40 does match 130.223.27.40:80. What you need to do is to replace

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting

2005-08-29 Thread Isabelle Moullet
@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting I already tried that.. No way.. same problem. Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit : That is because you do not have any NameVirtualHost definition for 130.223.27.40:8080. However 130.223.27.40 does match 130.223.27.40:80. What

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting

2005-08-29 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
directive and the DirectoryIndex one. Might. I do not use mod_vhost_alias, so I would'nt know. -ascs -Original Message- From: Isabelle Moullet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:54 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting Axel

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass virtual hosting

2005-08-23 Thread Spike Burkhardt
Isabelle, In your VirtualHost directive try: VirtualHost http://www2n.unil.ch:8080 http://www2n.unil.ch spike Isabelle Moullet wrote: Bonjour, I am trying to install mass virtual hosting with Apache 2.0.53. I have the the following instructions in my conf file: # LoadModule

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mass Virtual Hosting

2005-05-20 Thread jcm
Hi, Message de Ludger Palm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hallo *! We are planning to launch mass virtual hosting on a LAMP-based server farm running several ten thousand virtual webservers serving about a million http requests per day. Who can communicate information or contact to people meeting this

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mass Virtual Hosting

2005-05-20 Thread PMilanese
Just adding a bit more experience to the pile. Hope it is useful. (inline)- - how to point the ftp to the right direction, since you'll have several machines, the data won't be centralized (would the FTP server mount all the disks thrugh NFS (??) or would you use AFS to have a single big

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mass Virtual Hosting

2005-05-20 Thread Marian Marinov
Because no one have mentioned this. I will :) If you plan to use centralized hosting as I presume, you really need to thing about GFS... it is significantly better then AFS NFS. About the configurations... most of the daemons(FTP,DNS,MTA) support DB backends. This improves the configurations