[EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF Documentation

2006-06-09 Thread Joost de Heer
Hello, Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't distributed in PDF format anymore? Joost - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF Documentation

2006-06-09 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Joost de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 10:33 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF Documentation Hello, Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't distributed in PDF format

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF Documentation

2006-06-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't distributed in PDF format anymore? Because it takes a chunk of time to generate the pdf file and nobody has gotten around to it. The difference between the docs for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF Documentation

2006-06-09 Thread Joost de Heer
Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't distributed in PDF format anymore? Because it takes a chunk of time to generate the pdf file and nobody has gotten around to it. I wasn't

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF Documentation

2006-06-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/9/06, Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Is there a specific reason why the 2.2 (or 2.0.58) documentation isn't distributed in PDF format anymore? Because it takes a chunk of time to generate the pdf