On Saturday 05 November 2005 18:04, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
It probably the best one until this comes out:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1590594436/002-2785792
-3636047?v=glance
Good grief! That one was abandoned a *long* time ago. Don't say Amazon
are taking orders on it?
I didn't know it was abandoned, sorry.
Is there going to be an equivalent?
Boysenberry
boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com
On Nov 5, 2005, at 12:10 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 18:04, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
It probably the best one until this comes
On Saturday 05 November 2005 18:14, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
I didn't know it was abandoned, sorry.
Is there going to be an equivalent?
With a bit of luck there'll be a real book on the subject:-)
On the apache modules list I said watch this space. I guess this list
might just get to hear of
What list is the Apache Modules list, I'll sign up for that one too.
Never hurts to learn new things.
Boysenberry
boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com
On Nov 5, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 18:14, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
I didn't know it
:
- Original Message -
From:
Joshua Slive
To:
users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:14
PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serving
dynamic pages with C
On 11/3/05, Rob Belics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I would like my Apache server
On Friday 04 November 2005 15:40, Joshua Kogut wrote:
Also, what advantages over perl, php, heck, even asp does C have?
Haven't we had enough language wars here in your php-vs-perl thread?
Each has its place, and you wouldn't have perl or php - let alone their
apache bindings - if someone hadn't
I am not warring, I am just wondering why C?
ALSO, I did not START that php vs perl thread. I dropped the topic and somebody else picked it back up in a new thread.
I am just an innocent person wanting to know more. So don't blame me for somebody elses ignoreance. /flameOn 11/4/05, Nick Kew
From: Joshua Kogut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, what advantages over perl, php, heck, even asp does C have? Many of
these server-side languages have syntax that is closely related to C.
There's a better way to do this, and you would be saving yourself alot of
time and effort.
A combined idea could be
I good book to check out is Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C by
O'Reilly.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/wrapmod/desc.html
Boysenberry
boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com
On Nov 3, 2005, at 6:58 PM, Rob Belics wrote:
I would like my Apache server to dynamically create
It was thus said that the Great Joshua Kogut once stated:
Also, what advantages over perl, php, heck, even asp does C have? Many of
these server-side languages have syntax that is closely related to C.
There's a better way to do this, and you would be saving yourself alot of
time and effort.
Cool, I should try that out.
btw:I am not so great, I know *nothing*. Just have lots of opinions.On 11/4/05, Sean Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was thus said that the Great Joshua Kogut once stated: Also, what advantages over perl, php, heck, even asp does C have? Many of
these server-side
On Friday 04 November 2005 16:56, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
I good book to check out is Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C by
O'Reilly.
Well, it's no doubt better than nothing, but it's too old to apply to much
more than CGI-replacement level development with current apache versions.
--
I would like my Apache server to dynamically create and serve some web
pages using 'C'. I am not interested in using the default CGI or Perl.
I have gotten myself turned round and round for weeks on how to do
this. I know I need to use the API but I don't understand where
handlers and
Title: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serving dynamic pages with C
- Original Message -
From:
Joshua Slive
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:14
PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serving
dynamic pages with C
On 11/3/05, Rob Belics
14 matches
Mail list logo
