Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-25 Thread Nick Kew
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:31:00 +0100 Samuel Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just another question: Would chaining the filters actually achieve what we want? Yes. An expression-parser in mod_filter would be a better solution, though it would also require more work. We want to run mod_layout on

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-25 Thread Samuel Vogel
I did file a bug report: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43956 I also tried what you suggested. Inflating the content if it's gzip and then running mod_layout. But that did not work: FilterDeclare removegzip CONTENT_SET FilterProvider removegzip inflate resp=Content-Encoding

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-24 Thread Samuel Vogel
Sounds Great. Problem is, that we are a German free host (kilu.de) and do not display ads on the user pages. This is why we can not support any real development efforts. But if you say it could probably easily be fixed, I'm sure this would be affordable from our side. Should we continue with

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-24 Thread Samuel Vogel
Just another question: Would chaining the filters actually achieve what we want? We want to run mod_layout on all pages with Content-Type text/html _except_ those which have Content-Encrytion gzip. I'm not quite sure if chaining the filters would do this, so I'm asking before we put money

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-23 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:30:25 +0100 Samuel Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, I have a question about mod_filter. I would like to run an output filter only if the content is not compressed and it's type is text/html. I have tried the following: FilterDeclare addcomment

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-23 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:51:50 +0100 Samuel Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The bad news (speaking from memory) is, I don't think that's fully implemented as of now (did you try it?). I don't think I recollect seeing anyone ask for it before you did This unfortunately does not work. OK, my

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-23 Thread Samuel Vogel
Is it really not possible to connect 2 mod_filter matches? Isn't there some kind of workarround? Regards, Samy Samuel Vogel schrieb: Hey guys, I have a question about mod_filter. I would like to run an output filter only if the content is not compressed and it's type is text/html. I have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-23 Thread Samuel Vogel
How it should work: FilterProvider foo LAYOUT resp=Content-Encoding !$gzip FilterProvider addcomment foo resp=Content-Type $text/html i.e. once you've declared foo, you can chain it by using it as a provider for your new filter. The bad news (speaking from memory) is, I don't think that's

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_filter: and conjunction between two filters

2007-11-22 Thread Samuel Vogel
Hey guys, I have a question about mod_filter. I would like to run an output filter only if the content is not compressed and it's type is text/html. I have tried the following: FilterDeclare addcomment FilterProvider addcomment LAYOUT resp=Content-Encoding !$gzip FilterProvider addcomment