RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning

29, 2008 8:13 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning Hi All, I am new to this group. I would to know how i can tune apache to give better performance. Thanks -- Krishna Chandra Prajapati MySQL DBA, Ed Ventures e-Learning Pvt.Ltd. 1-8-303/48/15, Sindhi Colony P.G.Road

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning

] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Februar 2008 07:19 An: users@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning Most time (I'm sure it's 90%) the performance is descided by application,not apache itself. Even apache the default installion has good performance enough. For us we need the higher performance

[EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning

Hi All, I am new to this group. I would to know how i can tune apache to give better performance. Thanks -- Krishna Chandra Prajapati MySQL DBA, Ed Ventures e-Learning Pvt.Ltd. 1-8-303/48/15, Sindhi Colony P.G.Road, Secunderabad. Pin Code: 53 Office Number: 040-66489771 Mob: 9912924044 URL:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning

Most time (I'm sure it's 90%) the performance is descided by application,not apache itself. Even apache the default installion has good performance enough. For us we need the higher performance really, so we develop our own webserver (called Qhttpd), it's maybe not so standard, but can handle much

[EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning apache binary

Hey guys, As I'm upgrading my servers (Debian Etch) to apache 2.2.6 I'm wondering what optimizations can be done at compile time. I bet there are some aggressive gcc flags or other tricks. Almost everything that can be a module is a module in the Debian Apache. Since I only load the modules I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning apache binary - Email found in subject

Subject: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning apache binary - Email found in subject Hey guys, As I'm upgrading my servers (Debian Etch) to apache 2.2.6 I'm wondering what optimizations can be done at compile time. I bet there are some aggressive gcc flags or other tricks. Almost everything that can

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning apache binary - Email found in subject

I know that it will also depend on the content Apache servers, but I bet I can also tweak performance memory consumption at compile time. Regards, Samy [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Actually IIRC memory consumption will depend on your site if it's a static or dynamic.. I did some tweak on

[EMAIL PROTECTED] tuning mod_rewrite

Hi All, I have a .htaccess file which is working perfectly for redirecting root (/) pages to be searched to a subfolder. The rule is below ... = RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/(profile|images)$ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning the MaxKeepAliveRequests and KeepAliveTimeout http.conf parameters

Arthur Kreitman wrote: I noticed a random but all to frequent (perhaps 1 or 2 or 3 for every few hundred http requests) error from ap_core_output_filter (about line 903 in core_filters.c). The error is an os 10054 “An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host”. At the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning the MaxKeepAliveRequests and KeepAliveTimeout http.conf parameters

And what about bad side effects from increasing the linger time? -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 12:50 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning the MaxKeepAliveRequests

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning tomcat4 and expression matching with apache

Hi List, I have a specific question about apache _expression_ matching. I have a apache tomcat server setup . While tuning tomcat i needed to achieve some tweaking to the apache _expression_ matching , or atleast that i felt . The site have all incoming urls (www.subdomain.domain.com type) are