Carsten Wiedmann wrote:
William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
I agree it should be easier, Rich and I have it down to 3-4 lines of rewrite
magic
to kick out a 400, but we should probably allow this to be explicit
[default?]
That would be nice. And if I'm be able to set the status code in a
William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
RewriteRule .* - [R=400]
Hm, ok, I've never realized, that I can set other status codes in
RewriteRule [R], then the well known redirect status codes (Redirection
3xx). A little bit curious?
With [R=400] it's the same as with the Perl script (thanks for this
Carsten Wiedmann wrote:
Well, and the error document with [R=400] (or other status codes) is also
not multi language.
Right; presume for a moment that anyone hitting your server with a bogus dns
reference or by-ip is doing so in a less-than-friendly, spidery or malicious
manner. Are they
William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
Well, and the error document with [R=400] (or other status codes) is also
not multi language.
Right; presume for a moment that anyone hitting your server with a bogus dns
reference or by-ip is doing so in a less-than-friendly, spidery or malicious
manner. Are
Carsten Wiedmann schrieb:
It's the same as with:
| RewriteRule ^.*$ - [R=400]
BTW:
If httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf is enabled, all above solutions are also
not working nice. Because now the error document shows:
Just for the records. This is doing the trick:
| NameVirtualHost *:80
|
|
André Warnier schrieb:
But is is interesting to see how in the end, a document such as RFC2616
which is meant to specify a relatively strict set of rules, and of
which I am sure the phrasing is examined carefully and repeatedly (it
being after all a revision of an earlier document on the same
William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
I agree it should be easier, Rich and I have it down to 3-4 lines of rewrite
magic
to kick out a 400, but we should probably allow this to be explicit [default?]
That would be nice. And if I'm be able to set the status code in a
RewriteRule and/or Header
Eric Covener wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Carsten Wiedmann carsten_st...@gmx.de wrote:
André Warnier schrieb:
So how do you enumerate invalid hosts explicitly then ?
Right, it's a little bit curious, that you can't set 400 with mod_rewrite
(or header), only 403 (or 410).
In 2.2.x
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Carsten Wiedmann carsten_st...@gmx.de wrote:
André Warnier schrieb:
So how do you enumerate invalid hosts explicitly then ?
Right, it's a little bit curious, that you can't set 400 with mod_rewrite
(or header), only 403 (or 410).
In 2.2.x you can probably use
