On 5/31/2012 1:40 PM, kharp...@oreillyauto.com wrote:
> I am using AJP exclusively to the balancer-members. Forgive my
> ignorance... but will apache still take action if a "failonstatus" is set
> (for example, to 503) if AJP is the communication medium to the
> balancer-member? I assume apache c
Hello Daniel,
> There is a failonstatus parameter you can set for each
> balancer member that will have mod_proxy_balancer mark the worker out of
> service if that status code is found
I noticed that parameter and had considered it, but wasn't sure how apache
would know to re-enable it. Thank yo
On 5/31/2012 10:49 AM, kharp...@oreillyauto.com wrote:
> However, if I stop a context (to
> simulate a crashed app) and leave tomcat running, apache seems to consider
> the balancer member alive. Obviously, this results in "unavailable"
> responses from Tomcat to the end user.
Hi, Kyle - with any
Hello,
I have a couple apache http servers (v2.2) proxying requests to a handful
of tomcat servers (6.x) serving applications in individual contexts. I
have a ProxyPass line for each context in my config. I'm utilizing the
proxy balancer and its working well; if I kill "tomcat1", apache will qu
