Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 or 2.2

2006-01-04 Thread Steven Pierce
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 1/4/2006 at 9:01 PM Jason Williard wrote: I am building a set of web servers that will be running both Apache 1.3.x and a version of the 2.x branches. My question is quite simple... Which version is recommended? Is the 2.2 branch stable enough and

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 or 2.2

2006-01-04 Thread Jason Williard
to make that a good choice? Thank You, Jason Williard -Original Message- From: Steven Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:16 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 or 2.2 *** REPLY SEPARATOR

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 or 2.2

2006-01-04 Thread Steven Pierce
- From: Steven Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:16 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 or 2.2 *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 1/4/2006 at 9:01 PM Jason Williard wrote: I am building a set of web servers

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 or 2.2

2006-01-04 Thread Nick Kew
On Thursday 05 January 2006 05:01, Jason Williard wrote: I am building a set of web servers that will be running both Apache 1.3.x ... three years obsolete ... and a version of the 2.x branches. My question is quite simple... Which version is recommended? Is the 2.2 branch stable enough and