>>
>> * *
>>
>> [image: Description: imagesCAV9FMB1] + 92 334 9771227 | [image:
>> Description: imagesCAXWPPLS] kashif_r | *w* www.vopium.com
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Anurag Kapur [mailto:anuragka...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, June
334 9771227 | [image:
> Description: imagesCAXWPPLS] kashif_r | *w* www.vopium.com
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Anurag Kapur [mailto:anuragka...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2012 4:01 AM
> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] Software Load Balancers |
www.vopium.com <http://www.vopium.com/>
From: Anurag Kapur [mailto:anuragka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 4:01 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Software Load Balancers | mod_proxy_balancer and
Varnish
No, I am looking to pick one of mod_proxy_balan
No, I am looking to pick one of mod_proxy_balancer or varnish and thus
looking for pros and cons.
Anurag
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Filipe Cifali wrote:
> Ldirectord
You have to use mod_proxy_balancer + Varnish?
HA + Ldirectord + Memcached + Apache can do everything you want there and a
little more.
The HA solution have several possible setups that, combined with DNS
Failover can make your setup almost perfect.
2012/6/21 Anurag Kapur
> Hi,
>
> Apologies in
