On 02.03.2012, at 15:59, Vivek Nambiar wrote:
http://servername:port/myapp then it should redirect itself to
https://servername:SSLport/myapp.
I have added the following rewrite condition and rule in my httpd.conf file
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} PORT
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$
i want to use openssl 0.9.8. Is this compatible with 2.4.1?
2012/3/4 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org
[snip]
You will need to rebuild all external modules of course given its a
new major (like php, mod_perl etc)
The latest stable of mod_perl (2.0.5) doesn't currently build with
2.4.1.
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:45 +0530, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:
i want to use openssl 0.9.8. Is this compatible with 2.4.1?
Builds fine with openssl-0.9.8 I build against openssl-0.9.8t
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
2012/3/4 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org
[snip]
You will need to rebuild all external modules of course
given its a
new major (like php, mod_perl etc)
The latest stable of mod_perl
On 3/5/2012 1:03 AM, Alain Roger wrote:
Hi,
on my local windows 7 computer, i have installed and setup a web
server for development purpose.
everything works well under port 80 (listening, servername, etc..), i
also setup virtualhost in extra conf file as following:
VirtualHost *:80
On March 4, 2012 22:11 , Rajeev Prasad rp.ne...@yahoo.com wrote:
want to make sure my web server is highly secure.
I am not sure between modsecurity and AppArmor. can someone help with
their experience?
mod_security is a web application firewall that works at the HTTP level
to protect the
Hello List,
ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by mod-status
for my users?
every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view
complete status.
how to disable this?
Thanks,
Hajo
On March 3, 2012 7:22 , Daniel danco...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, I just realized that earlier, as I thought Location /www/
meant server side.
It works, however it passes all traffic through PHP-FPM and gives a
Access denied. message on static files, and does not allow passing
variables
I have found an alternative method that works nicely, only passes .php
files to PHP-FPM and allows the variables to pass.
ProxyPassMatch ^(.*\.php)$ fcgi://
127.0.0.1:9000/www/danielhe/danielhe.com/cookie.danielhe.com$1
This is really weird though, because when it's put outside of a vhost, it
Hi!
When porting/cross-compiling the Apache HTTP Server the build fails with
the following error message: /bin/sh: ./gen_test_char: cannot execute
binary file.
This is due to that the gen_test_char is compiled with the
cross-compiler but executed on the build system.
This error has been around
On 02.03.12 15:29, Soumendu Bhattacharya wrote:
We use Apache + mod_cache for caching our website. Our mod_cache
rule is such that it enables caching for all and then selectively certain
url pattern is disabled (like some contexts). Currently the need is that if
a certain cookie is
On 05.03.12 14:32, Hajo Locke wrote:
ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by
mod-status for my users?
every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view
complete status.
I'm afraid the only way to disable this is to disable mod_status.
I don't know
hello,
I'm afraid the only way to disable this is to disable mod_status.
I don't know of any other way and I that's why I don't use mod_status.
which module you are using? i cant renounce to view a statuspage of my
server.
Thanks,
Hans
On March 5, 2012 8:32 , Hajo Locke hajo.lo...@gmx.de wrote:
ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by
mod-status for my users?
every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view
complete status.
how to disable this?
Disable mod_status, or turn off
I haven't been able to play with this yet but shouldn't something like this
work as well?
LocationMatch \.php$
ProxyPass fcgi://127.0.0.1:9000
/LocationMatch
Regards,
Dennis
On 03/05/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel wrote:
I have found an alternative method that works nicely, only passes .php
files
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 06:06:51PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 01.03.2012 17:19, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:38:10PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:34:22 +0100
Juergen Daubertj...@jue.li wrote:
Any ideas or suggestions?
Set Loglevel to debug, or if
thx Mark, it does help to understand things better. so that mean grsecurity and
AppArmor doing the same thing? except that grsecurity is much complex and
harder i guess. (I wanted to do that, but does not have enough expertise to
think of building a LAMP install on grsecurity patched ubuntu.)
The strange thing is that everything works with apache 2.2.x, so
my guess is that there are either new but undocumented configuration
switches or we have a regression in 2.4.1.
BTW, I've found another report for probably the same issue, see [1].
[1]
On March 5, 2012 11:20 , Rajeev Prasad rp.ne...@yahoo.com wrote:
thx Mark, it does help to understand things better. so that mean
grsecurity and AppArmor doing the same thing? except that grsecurity
is much complex and harder i guess. (I wanted to do that, but does not
have enough expertise to
On 5 March 2012 08:06, Steve Swift swi...@swiftys.org.uk wrote:
This certainly sounds like a situation for SUEXEC.
However, if you need the apache server to assign files to arbitrary
user:group then there are two ways that I know of:
1. You could create a SUDO entry which allows apache
Thank you! This worked for me :)
LocationMatch ^(.*\.php)$
ProxyPass fcgi://127.0.0.1:9000
/LocationMatch
I'm not sure why the ProxyPassMatch does not work inside the vhost though,
but LocationMatch does.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
I
I'm very puzzled with this simple question: the name of the http server is
httpd
or apache2?
This is because, all apache documentation, in http.apache.org, refers to it as
httpd, however in my Ubuntu installation it appears to be apache2.
Were not I someone that has some idea of this, I would
The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other
modifications. This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache 1.x and
Apache 2.x, but its use is mostly void nowadays.
Some other changes and layout
Mathijs mathijssch at gmail.com writes:
The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other modifications.
This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache 1.x and Apache 2.x, but
its
use is mostly void
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 23:19 +0100, Mathijs wrote:
The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other
modifications. This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache
1.x and Apache 2.x, but its use is mostly
On 03/03/2012 06:51 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during
development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache
source bundle and noted that:
Is 2.4.1 is compatible with OpenSSL 1.0.0.?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
**
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:45 +0530, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:
i want to use openssl 0.9.8. Is this compatible with 2.4.1?
Builds fine with openssl-0.9.8 I build
27 matches
Mail list logo
