In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fredrik Tolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:07 +, Jim Crowther wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fredrik Tolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
AGFA
?
Well, _I_ don't know. ;-)
I've deleted the message by now, but it looked like the
--On Mittwoch, 16. März 2005 19:09 -0500 James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:26:18PM -0500, Bellino, Phil wrote:
Hello,
Tftp using IPv4 and destination port 69 is reachable and transfer takes
place.
Can ping6 to tunnel destination address with no problem, but when using
Ok, things are starting to make a little more sense, thank you all.
I was ready to assign an IP of 2002: to a windows xp client when I
realized that this machine is behind a firewall and has a nat'ed address
of 10.0.10.x. I would not think that would be allowed.
Is this a correct assumption?
Yes, you can't use 6to4 with private addresses (at least to talk to the
rest of the Internet). 6to4 won't work to a router behind a NAT. For
the particular case of Windows XP, the IPv6 stack won't even attempt to
create a 6to4 address from a private address.
You shouldn't need to tunnel inside
Well, with ipv6 there is no need to NAT anymore, you have plenty of addresses
to chooce from.
Your hosts wil have two addresses, 1 for ipv4 (10.0.10.x) and one for ipv6
2001:a:b::x
routing to ipv6 land will be done using the 2001:a:b::x and routing to ipv4
land will be done by the 10.0.10.x
Hi Brian,
Regarding 6to4 with NAT/private addresses ... I had some time ago a
different experience. But not sure right now if it was using XP with SP1 or
SP2, which could make the difference.
I was using a GPRS cellular phone, via Bluetooth or infrared (not sure right
now, long time ago). Then I
Things are even clearer now
But.
I am running radvd on the firewall, and I have it advertising a /48 to
my internal machines. radvd avertises on eth1, which is the lan side of
the router. The winxp and linux clients on the inside both pick up
addresses from the advertising router. I can
I have protocol 41 allowed to pass on my router.
Bound, Jim wrote:
Thats where Teredo can help otherwise you need to be able to get inside
your router to permit protocol 41 and encap Ipv6, which some hard core
operator type engineers I know have done. This is a huge problem for
many. It basically
thats cool. What router is that? Are you on xDSL or Cable? What
geography?
this is a good list and good discussion for sure.
thanks
/jim
-Original Message-
From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:09 PM
To: Bound, Jim
Cc: users@ipv6.org
