Hello:
I am trying to understand the mechanism of 6to4 tunnels.
Could anyone explain me the difference between 6to4 gateway and 6to4
Relay Router ?
--
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" t
Hello.
New to ipv6, have read a lot, still confused...
I run a linux router acting as an ipv6 gateway, which connects to
Hurricane Electric tunnel. I can browse web pages and ping things using
ipv6 addresses just fine from this box.
I also run two clients, winxp and linux box, both configured w
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to understand the mechanism of 6to4 tunnels.
> Could anyone explain me the difference between 6to4 gateway and 6to4
> Relay Router ?
> --
www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/jul01/pdfs/jul01.pdf
The Article is "T
Hi Mike,
Did your ipv6 provider gave you a /48 block, or did you just allocate one
yourself?
The /48 should have more numbers than just 2001::
A complete writedown of a /48 block should look like this:
2001:1234:5678:::::
Or in the short notation:
2001:1234:5678::
It is als
Thanks for responding.
I went to the ipv6 irc channel and got nothing but rudeness! You don't
dare ask a question there that is below expert level or you get your
head knocked off. That's too bad.
I am aware of a full ip address, just figured I would spare you the full
address since it is not
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 21:02 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
>Hello.
>
>New to ipv6, have read a lot, still confused...
>Should the /48 block actually be a 2002: block to be a compatible 6to4
>address? If so, why would Hurricane Electric give me a 2001: prefix
>unstead of a 2002?
Check this picture
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 04:41 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
> I am aware of a full ip address, just figured I would spare you the full
> address since it is not pertenant to the question.
>
> I keep reading that with 6to4 addresses, they are supposed to start with
> 2002: prefixes so that autoconfig
Hi Mike,
I am sorry that the people on #ipv6 where not cooperative, i use
irc.freenode.net and never had any trouble whatsoever.
I hope the mail from Fredrik Tolf made things more clear in respect to
6to4 addresses.
If your provider gave you an /48 block, you can use these address to hand
out t
2005 6:38 AM
> To: Michael Banta
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
>
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 04:41 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
> > I am aware of a full ip address, just figured I would spare
> you the full
> > address since it is not
5:53 AM
> To: Michael Banta
> Cc: users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
>
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 21:02 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
> >Hello.
> >
> >New to ipv6, have read a lot, still confused...
>
> >Should the /48 block actually be a 2002: block to
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fredrik Tolf
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:38 AM
To: Michael Banta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@ipv6.org
Subject: Re: 6to4 question
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 04:41 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
I am aware of a full ip address, just
ecate 6to4 and move to IPv6 addresses directly?
> >
> >thanks
> >/jim
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >>Behalf Of Fredrik Tolf
> >>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 20
ta
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 March, 2005 11:58
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Fredrik Tolf; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
>
> I did not know that I could. I thought that since my ISP
> does not provide native IPv6 services that I had to use a
> tunn
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Tolf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
AGFA
?
--
Jim Crowther
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:07 +, Jim Crowther wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Tolf
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> >AGFA
>
> ?
Well, _I_ don't know. ;-)
I've deleted the message by now, but it looked like the
bantacomputers.com e-mail system was hosted by AGFA or something.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Tolf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:07 +, Jim Crowther wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Tolf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>AGFA
?
Well, _I_ don't know. ;-)
I've deleted the message by now, but it looked like the
bantacom
ecate 6to4 and move to IPv6 addresses directly?
thanks
/jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fredrik Tolf
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:38 AM
To: Michael Banta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@ipv6.org
Subject: Re: 6to4 question
On Wed,
Well, with ipv6 there is no need to NAT anymore, you have plenty of addresses
to chooce from.
Your hosts wil have two addresses, 1 for ipv4 (10.0.10.x) and one for ipv6
2001:a:b::x
routing to ipv6 land will be done using the 2001:a:b::x and routing to ipv4
land will be done by the 10.0.10.x addre
ichael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 12:57 PM
> To: Bound, Jim; users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
>
> I don't know. My linux router works fine, say going to kame.net, or
> pinging it via ipv6. Not sure how to handle my inside
is a bummer.
/jim
-Original Message-
From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 12:57 PM
To: Bound, Jim; users@ipv6.org
Subject: Re: 6to4 question
I don't know. My linux router works fine, say going to kame.net, or
pinging it via ipv6. Not
users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
>
> I have protocol 41 allowed to pass on my router.
>
> Bound, Jim wrote:
>
> >Thats where Teredo can help otherwise you need to be able to
> get inside
> >your router to permit protocol 41 and encap Ipv6, which som
hanks
/jim
-Original Message-
From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:09 PM
To: Bound, Jim
Cc: users@ipv6.org
Subject: Re: 6to4 question
I have protocol 41 allowed to pass on my router.
Bound, Jim wrote:
Thats where Teredo can help otherwise you
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 18:17 -0500, Michael Banta wrote:
> It is a linux router running MDK10.1. It is a cable connection with a
> static ip. Dayton, OH.
>
> I am soo close! Just can't get there.
Micheal, I still haven't really understood what your actual problem is.
You said previously that y
Forwarding is turned on.
The internal clients (1 winxp box, 1 MDK linux box) both obtain an ipv6
address. They can both ping6 to the router's lan interface (eth1), both
neither can ping6 the outside interface of the router (eth0). From my
experience in the ipv4 world, this would sound like a r
Nice.
/jim
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:17 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
>
> It is a linux router running MDK10.1. It is a cable
> con
Hi Mike,
If you use a tunnel to connect to ipv6 land i would expect that you ping6
tun0/sit0 or the other end of the tunnel, not your eth0 interface.
If you are using a tunnel, eth0 should only have an ipv4 address, not a
ipv6 address.
Hope this helps.
Kind rgards,
@
>Forwarding is turned on.
Ed,
eth0 can(and does) have the autoconfigured Native Link-Local address
fe80:..... address.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Kapitein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 7:27 AM
To: users@ipv6.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 6to4
t;this is a good list and good discussion for sure.
> >thanks
> >/jim
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Michael Banta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:09 PM
> >>To: Bound
sage-
> From: Ed Kapitein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 7:27 AM
> To: users@ipv6.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 6to4 question
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> If you use a tunnel to connect to ipv6 land i would expect that you ping6
> tun
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 18:46 +0100, Ed Kapitein wrote:
>Hi mike,
>
>I have a working setup with an ipv6 tunnel and can connect from all my
>internal hosts to ipv6 hosts.
>But i cannot ping the link local addres of my router, and beacause it is a
>link local address, AFAIK you can not ping it from
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of ext Ed Kapitein
Sent: Fri 3/18/2005 19:46
To: Bellino, Phil; users@ipv6.org
Subject: Re: 6to4 question
Hi mike,
I have a working setup with an ipv6 tunnel and can connect from all my
internal hosts to ipv6 hosts.
But i cannot ping the link local addres of my
Yep, you are right, I missed that one.
I did actually get a ping6 response, for a minute. I already sent out
an email to the list so I won't go into detail here.
Thanks
Mike
Ed Kapitein wrote:
Hi Mike,
If you use a tunnel to connect to ipv6 land i would expect that you ping6
tun0/sit0 or the oth
32 matches
Mail list logo
