Hi,
I think I've read somewhere that domain services aren't always injected
into entities by default and you sometimes have to trigger this yourself?
Is this a correct?
Thank
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Stephen Cameron <
steve.cameron...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I cannot try alternatives til
If you just new them up:
Customer cust = new Customer();
then the framework doesn't know about it and any services will be null.
You can then use:
domainObjectContainer.injectServicesInto(cust);
~~~
Alternatively, use:
Customer cust = container.newTransientInstance(Customer.class);
to do bo
That is not the problem then,
Its a bit bizarre actually, I generated some logging and added some
messages, I see that two objects Participation and Participant do have
their region value set but the Person object doesn't.
All these objects extend the same base class, but the SQL insert created
My silly mistake!
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> That is not the problem then,
>
> Its a bit bizarre actually, I generated some logging and added some
> messages, I see that two objects Participation and Participant do have
> their region value set but the Person objec
Just to pull this thread apart a little:
- there are various tools candidates for Oscar's original use case, ie to
model class diagrams then forward generate into Java, thereafter ideally to
allow reverse engineering. Eclipse Papyrus looks promising for this
- for old-fashioned visualization of e
Hi, Dan for this summary.
I agree with Cesar that Eclipse Papyrus can be of help for the initial use case.
Just needing to know if it’s only a matter of configuring their profiles or
primitive types definition to generate entities, properties, actions, etc.
annotated with JDO and Isis annotatio
Yes, I still had a variable region declared in Person that was over-riding
the one in the base class I guess, so the setter was setting the super
class but the subclass value was being persisted.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> My silly mistake!
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015
Might be worth using Project Lombok, then... less boilerplate so easier to
spot such issues.
http://isis.apache.org/guides/cg.html#_cg_ide_project-lombok
On 26 November 2015 at 10:08, Stephen Cameron
wrote:
> Yes, I still had a variable region declared in Person that was over-riding
> the one
True, I created the error by tidying my code!
The current set of issues has been thrown up by removing some TODOs one of
which was to improve the compareTo() by adding in region to the list of
compare fields.
I have another one to sort out now.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Dan Haywood
w
Hi,
I am trying to improve the compareTo() functions that I have written and
ran into the following error.
- java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
- 31
- org.datanucleus.state.StateManagerImpl#isLoaded(StateManagerImpl.java:2893)
-
au.com.scds.chats.dom.module.activity.Recurring
Only time I've seen these sorts of index issues is when the enhancer didn't
run correctly over the entire codebase.
With respect to compareTo implementations, in Estatio we've got away with
using the ObjectContracts.compareTo method. So, for example, in LeaseItem,
whose parent is Lease and which
Hi Again
Thanks for your thoughts, looks like another silly mistake on my part
explains the error, I had to override getter in a child class to be able to
position it differently on the page and did not use
super.getStartDateTime(). I should use the JSON layouts for that kind of
thing.
The bookma
Hi Stephen.
You can also use Guava’s ComparisonChain as detailed in [1].
Cheers,
Oscar
[1]
http://docs.guava-libraries.googlecode.com/git/javadoc/com/google/common/collect/ComparisonChain.html
> El 26 nov 2015, a las 12:30, Stephen Cameron
> escribió:
>
> Hi Again
>
> Thanks for your tho
@Stephen: the sole responsibility of compareTo is to provide a natural
ordering based on comparing the values of it's own members against another
object of the same type. If you have ordering requirements beyond that
scope I suggest you add an order clause to the JDOQL query or use Guava's
Ordering
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Jeroen van der Wal
wrote:
> @Stephen: the sole responsibility of compareTo is to provide a natural
> ordering based on comparing the values of it's own members against another
> object of the same type. If you have ordering requirements beyond that
> scope I sugg
Dan, I'm not having any issues, everything is working just fine. Its just the
POM shows those dependencies as "red" but works fine, probably could just
delete those dependencies from the POM.
> org.apache.isis.tools artifact isis-maven-plugin .
> org.apache.isis.example-appplication artifact sim
Hi Vladimir,
thanks for pulling together that test case (though perhaps next time, just
create a repo with just the simpleapp, rather than all of Isis?!?)
Anyway... the issue is a programming error, but easily made.
In some of your actions you are accessing fields directly, instead you
should AL
Hi Dan, thank you for your support!
Comments inline.
Vladimir
> Am 26.11.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Dan Haywood :
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> thanks for pulling together that test case (though perhaps next time, just
> create a repo with just the simpleapp, rather than all of Isis?!?)
>
Ok, will do so
Hmm, it's a good question.
Ultimately what goes in the autoComplete is up to you... it takes a string
but that doesn't have to map to any particular property.
As a little experiment, I just tweaked the todoapp's ToDoItem#autoComplete
for adding dependencies. Normally this searches on the descrip
Actually, let me have a second go at answering this...
I think you probably just want a dependent choices...
public CustomerOrder addCustomerOrderPayment(
CustomerOrder customerOrder,
CustomerSubscription customerSubscription)
{
...
}
public List autoComplete0A
20 matches
Mail list logo
