Hey Dave,
tnx for your reply. Yes I did describe my case poorly. I am not even sure
if I need to use domain and range property, I am new to semantic and Jena.
What I would like to achieve is to build some kind of document library,
where some documents use and create other documents. Thanks to feed
Garbage collecting the restrictions sounds interesting.
I aught to be able to iterate through all anonymous classes and see if
they're 'used' (or referenced).
Thanks for the response.
--
Mark Fischer
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> On 05/03/13 22:02, David Jordan wrote:
On 05/03/13 22:02, David Jordan wrote:
If you have your ontology in its own separate Model, doesn't model.removeAll()
do it?
I understood Mark to be trying to remove individual axioms from within a
Model, not just empty the Model.
For example, if you have declared a class with some associa
On 05/03/13 17:26, Mark Fischer wrote:
I'd like to talk about all integers greater then 400.
This appears to be what I'm looking to do.
http://jena.sourceforge.net/how-to/typedLiterals.html#userXSD
Seems I need to create a file such that reading it in will create the user
defined
types that I'm
If you have your ontology in its own separate Model, doesn't model.removeAll()
do it?
On Mar 5, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> On 05/03/13 20:20, Mark Fischer wrote:
>> Is there an easy way to cleanly remove resources from an Ontology?
>>
>> Currently, I just remove all statements th
On 05/03/13 20:20, Mark Fischer wrote:
Is there an easy way to cleanly remove resources from an Ontology?
Currently, I just remove all statements that have the resource present.
This works well enough but I'm worried that it will leave
anonymous superclasses behind.
Yes, it will.
I also wond
Vegard,
have you looked at SPIN constraints?
http://spinrdf.org/spin.html#spin-constraints
http://semwebquality.org/ontologies/dq-constraints
Martynas
graphity.org
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Vegard Vaage wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to verify instance data against an ontology using Jenas O
Hi,
Say I s-put a bunch of OWL files in to my Fuseki server in memory, all goes
well. Over time, I may wish to add more, update the files... the usual SOH
stuff.
Is there any mechanism to actually understand how the underlying data us
structured?
For example within the control panel, it would be ni
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Dave Reynolds
wrote:
> On 05/03/13 16:16, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Dave Reynolds
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/03/13 14:11, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Vegard Vaage
wrote:
>
>
>
I'd like to talk about all integers greater then 400.
This appears to be what I'm looking to do.
http://jena.sourceforge.net/how-to/typedLiterals.html#userXSD
Seems I need to create a file such that reading it in will create the user
defined
types that I'm interested in. First, can I do this gram
On 05/03/13 16:16, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Dave Reynolds
wrote:
On 05/03/13 14:11, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Vegard Vaage wrote:
I'm trying to verify instance data against an ontology using Jenas OWL
reasoner. Right now I'm just tryi
I've been running Fuseki under Jetty with the ReconnectSDB library for awhile.
Here's what the shell script I use to start it looks like (this script is
invoked in init.d at startup)
#!/bin/sh
port=3030
java -cp
./fuseki-server.jar:lib/ReconnectingSDB-0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar:lib/jena-sdb-1.3.6-SNAPSH
On 05/03/13 15:47, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:
Another reason (we look to war) I did not mention yet was the fact that we do
not get it working as a service on linux so via:
script "service fuseki start"
What happens?
Did you install the fuseki script that comes with the distribution?
(You n
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Dave Reynolds
wrote:
> On 05/03/13 14:11, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Vegard Vaage wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to verify instance data against an ontology using Jenas OWL
>>> reasoner. Right now I'm just trying to verify that the input
I don't follow what you are trying to achieve but it sounds like at
least part of it is to be able to state that the domain or range of a
property is a union of classes, rather than a single class. At least
that's what your OWL API example seems to do.
This is perfectly possible in Jena. For e
Hi,
Try with an *&* at the end of your command line.
Ex:
fuseki-server --config=ConfigFile &
--
Ioan
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:
> Thx!, we'll have a look.
>
> Another reason (we look to war) I did not mention yet was the fact that we
> do not get it working
On 05/03/13 14:11, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Vegard Vaage wrote:
I'm trying to verify instance data against an ontology using Jenas OWL
reasoner. Right now I'm just trying to verify that the input literals are of
the correct types and ranges, but later on I'll need
On 05/03/13 12:48, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:
Dear all,
We want to run fuseki on a linux server.
We think we need a war otherwise we need one user continuously logged in it
seems.
Not necessary, use the Linux command nohup to run a script that will
survive logging out.
Dave
Thx!, we'll have a look.
Another reason (we look to war) I did not mention yet was the fact that we do
not get it working as a service on linux so via:
script "service fuseki start"
of you have idea's what could be the reason, always welcome!
(it says it has been started but nothing on 3030)
Thanks Andy. You were right, the default character encoding Postgres uses is
not UTF-8 compatible. I created a new environment with the right encoding and
it worked fine.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne.apa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Seaborne
Sent: Tues
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Vegard Vaage wrote:
> I'm trying to verify instance data against an ontology using Jenas OWL
> reasoner. Right now I'm just trying to verify that the input literals are of
> the correct types and ranges, but later on I'll need more advanced
> verification against
Hi,
I worked on a j2ee Fuseki distribution (a WAR file with Fuseki that
use an external DB like mysql). I wrote about it in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201 .
I solved the problem of the broken connection using ReconnectingSDB (
g...@github.com:shellac/ReconnectingSDB.git).
You can mo
Dear all,
We want to run fuseki on a linux server.
We think we need a war otherwise we need one user continuously logged in it
seems.
Thanks for advice, Michel
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at
http://www.tno.nl/emaildisclaimer
On 04/03/13 21:00, David Jordan wrote:
With the recent error I reported, I was trying to load dbPedia ontology in
RDF/XML format.
This is with Postgres 9.2 and SDB 1.3.6 Snapshot.
Caused by: java.sql.BatchUpdateException: Batch entry 3 INSERT INTO
NNodeQuads17852335 VALUES (-538803559104408383
Hi!
I'm trying to verify instance data against an ontology using Jenas OWL
reasoner. Right now I'm just trying to verify that the input literals are of
the correct types and ranges, but later on I'll need more advanced verification
against the ontology.
I've been following the Jena OWL Reasoner
25 matches
Mail list logo