RE: What about PDU? - Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-20 Thread Souza, Jeffrey R.
pbox. J.R.(Sydd)Souza -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nikola Goran Cutura Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:52 PM To: users@kannel.org Subject: What about PDU? - Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params Besides Kannel's intention to abstract specif

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-08 Thread fred
. probably should be discussing this in the devel list... Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:29 AM Subject: Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional p

What about PDU? - Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-07 Thread Nikola Goran Cutura
uld be given as array of bytes.. Would it be hard to implement in Kannel? Regards, NGC - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:29 PM Subject: Re: SMPP 3

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: You talking about TLV's right? It's a recurring issue, I think. Some operators ask for VARs to add this or that TLV to implement their custom billing module here or there and we are forced to do some terrible patch to comply with "their" specs. I did one once, it's no

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
You talking about TLV's right? It's a recurring issue, I think. Some operators ask for VARs to add this or that TLV to implement their custom billing module here or there and we are forced to do some terrible patch to comply with "their" specs. I did one once, it's not a "nice job" and creates de

RE: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Rene Kluwen
ge-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Alex KinchSent: maandag 5 juni 2006 21:46To: Mi ReflejoCc: users@kannel.orgSubject: Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params There was an Mblox patch floating around a while back that might be a good starting point for these cu

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Leonard
.   Leonard - Original Message - From: Alex Kinch To: Mi Reflejo Cc: Leonard ; users@kannel.org Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:46 PM Subject: Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params There was an Mblox patch floating around a while back that might be a good starting point for

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Alex Kinch
achieved can be found here:>> http://www.simplewire.com/downloads/files/Simplewire_SMPP_ShortCodes.pdf >>>>> - Original Message -> From: "Mi Reflejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: "Leonard" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Cc: <users@kannel.o

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Mi Reflejo
needs to be achieved can be found here: http://www.simplewire.com/downloads/files/Simplewire_SMPP_ShortCodes.pdf - Original Message - From: "Mi Reflejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 5:59 PM Subject:

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Leonard
]> Cc: Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 5:59 PM Subject: Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params There are no "optional parameters" in bind operations. (Maybe you are talking about system_type?) Kannel follows strictly SMPP specs. If you need to add any parameter which isn't in specs you should l

Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Mi Reflejo
There are no "optional parameters" in bind operations. (Maybe you are talking about system_type?) Kannel follows strictly SMPP specs. If you need to add any parameter which isn't in specs you should look to other way or take a look into sources by yourself :). Otherwise, if SimpleWire follows SMP

SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-05 Thread Leonard
Hi All, I need to set optional params on a SMPP 3.4 Bind, specifically for a bind to SimpleWire. These optional params set carrier, billing and other requirements. Is there anyway to do this with Kannel, or will I have to use their XML interface? Regards Leonard