On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 19:56:48 -0800 (PST)
George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My /var/log/messages is filling up with tons of these messages. Can anyone
> tell me why I'm getting them and what I need to do to "fix" the problem
> please?
Topic has come up before:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper
On 03/10/2012 11:56 AM, George R Goffe wrote:
> My /var/log/messages is filling up with tons of these messages. Can
> anyone tell me why I'm getting them and what I need to do to "fix" the
> problem please?
You didn't say what version of Fedora you are running and you didn't
mention anything about
Hi,
My /var/log/messages is filling up with tons of these messages. Can anyone tell
me why I'm getting them and what I need to do to "fix" the problem please?
Regards,
George...
Mar 9 18:41:11 joker dbus-daemon[989]: ** (upowerd:1685): WARNING **: Property
get or set does not have an interf
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2012/3/9 Alan Cox :
>>
>> So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system,
>> while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the
>> keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to som
Am 10.03.2012 02:39, schrieb David:
> You, sir, really,*really*, to find another OS. Other than Linux. This
> one, with its changes, is kicking your old, out of the main steam, a$$
laughable - i am software developer and able since many years
to make upgrade-transitions not noticeable for enduse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/9/2012 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> where the hell are kernel-params in F16 configured?
>
> [root@testserver:~]$ cat /boot/grub2/grub.cfg # # DO NOT EDIT THIS
> FILE # # It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using
> templates # from
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:53:07 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> BULLSHIT: "/etc/default/grub" is ignored
> it is displayed by "grub2-mkconfig" somewhere
Correct. Anaconda does use /etc/default/grub when it builds
the initial grub.cfg file, but after that all updates are
done by grubby when installing n
Am 10.03.2012 02:15, schrieb Joel Rees:
> Mindless reflex reaction here, but have you tried editing
> /etc/grub.d/40_custom ?
>
> Or adding your own /etc/grub.d/25_myparams or something?
the solution was a offlist-answer
"grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" instead "grub2-mkconfig"
what a
suvayu ali wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 18:55, Peter Gueckel wrote:
>> I was... referring to the majority of... Fedora users.
>
> What makes you think that is true? I would actually expect it to be
> otherwise. In any case, a distribution like Fedora cannot afford to
> make assumptions like t
Mindless reflex reaction here, but have you tried editing
/etc/grub.d/40_custom ?
Or adding your own /etc/grub.d/25_myparams or something?
[OT Rant:
Haven't done this on grub as installed by Fedora. Have used some of
this kind of configuration to get the grub Debian installs to find my
Fedora st
I have openbox (from the F16 security live image via live USB install)
on a lenovo s100 and, sometime in the last couple of kernel updates,
it likes to hang up on logging out.
Switch to a virtual console and do a ps, and openbox is there's a
leftover process that won't die. I've been able to do t
where the hell are kernel-params in F16 configured?
[root@testserver:~]$ cat /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
BULLSHIT: "/etc/default/grub" is ignored
it is dis
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 22:19 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> Dave Quigley writes:
>>
>> > Is there a list anywhere of supported hardware for gnome-shell? I've tried
>>
>> It's the same as the list of supported 3D hardware for x.org, on
>> http
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 18:55, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> suvayu ali wrote:
>
>
>> *cough* Majority of the world is not latin based language speaking *cough*
>
> I realize that, but I was not referring to the majority of the world's
> population, but to the majority of Fedora users.
What makes you thi
2012/3/9 Tom Horsley :
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:57:25 -0300
> Martín Marqués wrote:
>
>> > It is probably not being set to /dev/sr0
>>
>> How do I do that?
>
> If you ever swapped the DVD drive for a different one,
> there is (probably) a file named:
>
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules
>
>
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:57:25 -0300
Martín Marqués wrote:
> > It is probably not being set to /dev/sr0
>
> How do I do that?
If you ever swapped the DVD drive for a different one,
there is (probably) a file named:
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules
which contains the description of every
2012/3/9 Jim :
> On 03/09/2012 11:15 AM, Martín Marqués wrote:
>>
>> I see that F16 doesn't have hald anymore, and when trying to write a
>> DVD, k3b says it can't find the optical drive, and that I should check
>> out that hal daemon is up.
>>
>> So, what's up?
>>
> It is probably not being set to
suvayu ali wrote:
> *cough* Majority of the world is not latin based language speaking *cough*
I realize that, but I was not referring to the majority of the world's
population, but to the majority of Fedora users.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 18:14 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/08/2012 05:08 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 09:37 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> That just stops you from taking this to private email and makes
>
On 03/09/2012 04:05 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 09:07 +, Bruno Martins wrote:
>> On 03/08/2012 04:04 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
Hello list,
Is there any file that I must edit which sets the default screen
brightness to the maximum, so I don't need to chan
On 09/03/2012 15:02, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 03/09/2012 04:34 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 09/03/12 10:31, Aero Maxx wrote:
In the older versions of fedora there was runlevels and these seem to of
been replaced with targets instead, but my question is with the new
system, how do you change from wh
On 03/09/2012 11:15 AM, Martín Marqués wrote:
I see that F16 doesn't have hald anymore, and when trying to write a
DVD, k3b says it can't find the optical drive, and that I should check
out that hal daemon is up.
So, what's up?
It is probably not being set to /dev/sr0
--
users mailing list
use
Am 09.03.2012 17:15, schrieb Martín Marqués:
> I see that F16 doesn't have hald anymore, and when trying to write a
> DVD, k3b says it can't find the optical drive, and that I should check
> out that hal daemon is up.
that message must be wrong
you do not even need hald on F15, see below
and i
I see that F16 doesn't have hald anymore, and when trying to write a
DVD, k3b says it can't find the optical drive, and that I should check
out that hal daemon is up.
So, what's up?
--
Martín Marqués
select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com'
DBA, Programador, Administrador
--
users mailing
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 12:22 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 09/03/12 12:20, Bruno Martins wrote:
>
> > Since this is a related topic, the laptop function keys for setting
> > brightness up and down are the only ones not working.
> >
> > I have tested these keys with program 'xev' but key pressing
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 09:07 +, Bruno Martins wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 04:04 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > Is there any file that I must edit which sets the default screen
> > > brightness to the maximum, so I don't need to change it every time I
> > > restart my compute
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 22:19 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Dave Quigley writes:
>
> > Is there a list anywhere of supported hardware for gnome-shell? I've tried
>
> It's the same as the list of supported 3D hardware for x.org, on
> http://mesa.freedesktop.org, which seems to be down right now
On 03/09/2012 04:34 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 09/03/12 10:31, Aero Maxx wrote:
>> In the older versions of fedora there was runlevels and these seem to of
>> been replaced with targets instead, but my question is with the new
>> system, how do you change from what was runlevel 3 and runlevel 5
On 09/03/12 12:20, Bruno Martins wrote:
I have tested these keys with program 'xev' but key pressing is not
recognized.
Any ideas?
Maybe?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F16_bugs#bash-etc-shells
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 09/03/12 12:20, Bruno Martins wrote:
Since this is a related topic, the laptop function keys for setting
brightness up and down are the only ones not working.
I have tested these keys with program 'xev' but key pressing is not
recognized.
Any ideas?
Sorry no,
not really a laptop person.
On 03/09/2012 12:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 09/03/12 11:53, Bruno Martins wrote:
>
> Have a browse here:
> http://askubuntu.com/questions/3841/desktop-doesnt-remember-brightness-settings-after-a-reboot
>
>
>
>
It worked, mate. Thanks a lot.
Since this is a related topic, the laptop function k
On 09/03/12 11:53, Bruno Martins wrote:
Have a browse here:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/3841/desktop-doesnt-remember-brightness-settings-after-a-reboot
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 03/09/2012 10:57 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 09/03/12 10:53, Bruno Martins wrote:
>>
>> By the way, that instruction should be put on another file since I don't
>> have a /etc/rc.local file (maybe systemd doesn't use it?) and even if I
>> create it, it will not work. I will investigate.
>>
>> T
2012/3/9 Alan Cox :
>
> So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system,
> while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the
> keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to some
> users.
>
> Alan
Put in other words: You cannot do a
On 09/03/12 10:53, Bruno Martins wrote:
By the way, that instruction should be put on another file since I don't
have a /etc/rc.local file (maybe systemd doesn't use it?) and even if I
create it, it will not work. I will investigate.
Thanks,
From the release notes:
3.2.4. rc.local no longer
On 03/09/2012 09:45 AM, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2012/3/9, Bruno Martins :
>
>> I have that file, but setting that value to 10 is the same as going to
>> Screen GUI and scrolling the brightness to the maximum.
> Yes, that was the point. If you can set the brightness from the
> command line, you have a
> I fully agree with you but the question is "Why should we do this on
> linux?" Let the windoof people do whatever they want... You see that
> the module signing is more a less a measure against the so called
> "windows OEM-SLP activation with modded bootloaders". I don't see any
> benefit for lin
2012/3/9 Alan Cox :
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:07:55 +0100
...
> will be locked down by default and require some undefined
> screwing around to unlock. For x86 the spec currently does require they
> can be unlocked...
...
> Module signing itself isn't just useful for that though - its a matter of
> wh
On 09/03/12 10:31, Aero Maxx wrote:
In the older versions of fedora there was runlevels and these seem to of
been replaced with targets instead, but my question is with the new
system, how do you change from what was runlevel 3 and runlevel 5 on the
fly as and when you needed a gui.
https://fed
In the older versions of fedora there was runlevels and these seem to of
been replaced with targets instead, but my question is with the new
system, how do you change from what was runlevel 3 and runlevel 5 on the
fly as and when you needed a gui.
Am I correct in thinking that you now need to
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:07:55 +0100
"Joshua C." wrote:
> I saw that the x86 modules can (_should_) be signed int the future. We
> all know the pros and cons of signing but I'm wondering if all this
> _crap_ has anything to do with the microsoft's idea to use a signed
> bootloader, drivers, etc in t
I saw that the x86 modules can (_should_) be signed int the future. We
all know the pros and cons of signing but I'm wondering if all this
_crap_ has anything to do with the microsoft's idea to use a signed
bootloader, drivers, etc in the latest windoof 8. I think all of you
have heard that there's
2012/3/9, Bruno Martins :
> I have that file, but setting that value to 10 is the same as going to
> Screen GUI and scrolling the brightness to the maximum.
Yes, that was the point. If you can set the brightness from the
command line, you have a chance to automatically set it.
> Value doesn't ge
On 03/08/2012 04:04 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Is there any file that I must edit which sets the default screen
>> brightness to the maximum, so I don't need to change it every time I
>> restart my computer?
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 10:06 +0100, Andras Simon wrote:
>> echo 10 > /s
Am 09.03.2012 04:22, schrieb nu...@gmx.com:
>> what you are doing wrong is change working things
>> the following works perfectly (eth1: WAN, eth0: LAN)
>
>> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -j ACCEPT
>> ipatbles -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s 192.168.1.0/24 -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
>
> the
45 matches
Mail list logo
