Re: F23 nouveau HDMI Limitation?

On 01/09/16 18:45, Kari Koskinen wrote: > > > 2016-01-09 9:30 GMT+02:00 Ed Greshko >: > > Iwith nVidia they both worked well with native 2560x1440 resolution. > After switching to > nouveau in F23 the max resolution is 1920x1080.

Re: F23 nouveau HDMI Limitation?

> > I suppose I wasn't clear in the original message when I wrote > > In F22 with nVidia they both worked well with native 2560x1440 resolution. > > To be clearer In F22 running the nVidia drivers the monitor connected > to HDMI was > getting 2560x1440 resolution. Unless you have HDMI

Re: [Fedora] - No GUI after install bumblebee on Fedora 23

> > > Secure boot won't work with the proprietary nvidia drivers. At least not > without substantial effort (generate your own signing key, sign the dkms > generated modules with this, get key trusted by uefi) since the kernel > modules compiled are unsigned. > > If it looks like a USB issue

mpg123 not included, why?

#dnf install mpg123 "No package mpg123 available" Why is this? I thought mp3 DECODING was safe to distribute, as does Debian https://packages.debian.org/jessie/xmms2-plugin-mad and that only MP3 *encoding* was actively pursued by the Fraunhoffer Insitute and assorted MP3 cartels. according to

Miracast support still broken in Fedora? or is there hope?

Almost a year ago (11 months), the developer of Miracleclast, which implements Miracast [1] support for Linux, wrote: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-February/458142.html On 02.02.2015 19:58, David Herrmann wrote: >* [snip] *>* As people continuously ask me about this, I'll

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > mpg123 is available from the rpmfusion repos. Thanks Ed! Is there any side-effect from enabling the rpmfusion repos? Conflict with system libs? FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a

Re: F23 nouveau HDMI Limitation?

On 01/09/16 18:23, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 15:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I just upgraded from F22 to F23. Previously I'd been using the >> nVidia drivers via >> rpmfusion but they weren't working so I decided to move back to >> nouveau. > The nVidia drivers

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On 01/09/16 19:50, Fernando Cassia wrote: > #dnf install mpg123 > "No package mpg123 available" > > Why is this? I thought mp3 DECODING was safe to distribute, as does Debian > https://packages.debian.org/jessie/xmms2-plugin-mad > > and that only MP3 *encoding* was actively pursued by the

Re: F23: qtox and libsqlchiper

Il giorno ven, 08/01/2016 alle 09.16 -0700, stan ha scritto: > Perhaps you could put this into copr [1], so other people who might > want it could find it? > > 1. https://fedorahosted.org/copr/ yes, this is a good idea, but I'm not a expert of spec files and package build. I have adapt the spec

Re: F23 nouveau HDMI Limitation?

2016-01-09 9:30 GMT+02:00 Ed Greshko : > Iwith nVidia they both worked well with native 2560x1440 resolution. > After switching to > nouveau in F23 the max resolution is 1920x1080. 2560x1440 isn't even > shown in the output > of xrandr. > Resolution 1920x1080 is maximum

Re: F23 nouveau HDMI Limitation?

On 01/09/16 19:32, Kari Koskinen wrote: > Unless you have HDMI 2.0 it was 2560x1440@30 not 2560x1440@60. I don't have > hardware to > test if Nouveau limits resolution to whose capable of @60. From your > desciption it > sounds like Nouveau does that. > > Note that DisplayPort is capable of

Re: F23 nouveau HDMI Limitation?

On 01/09/16 18:23, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 15:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I just upgraded from F22 to F23. Previously I'd been using the >> nVidia drivers via >> rpmfusion but they weren't working so I decided to move back to >> nouveau. > The nVidia drivers

Re: F23 nouveau HDMI Limitation?

On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 15:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I just upgraded from F22 to F23.  Previously I'd been using the > nVidia drivers via > rpmfusion but they weren't working so I decided to move back to > nouveau. The nVidia drivers weren't working when F23 was released (because they didn't

Someone please provide this file

My Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 wlan needs backports-ath-2015-11-05.tar.bz2 but I can't download it. My laptop has no wifi. Please help -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora

Fedora 23 on Asus UX305C / UX305CA ultrabook

The UX305 is an ultrabook that can run Linux (google for discussion). So I bought a couple when the Canadian Microsoft Store had a great Boxing Day sale. (Boxing Day in Canada and the rest of the Commonwealth is a sale day like the US Black Friday. It is the day after Christmas.) It turns out

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On 01/10/16 03:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > That means you get to check back periodically and repeat the process by > hand if they've been updated. I don't see why most people would do > that. There really isn't a problem enabling RPMfusion repos. They are > designed to be used with the

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

Well well. Did you try downloading that on your system. That's the only link and it doesn't work at all. Someone please find an alternative please. Thanks On Saturday, January 9, 2016, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 01/09/2016 11:57 AM, M. Gelle wrote: > >> My Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 19:18 +0100, Philip Brown wrote: > On 01/09/2016 06:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko > > m> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > mpg123 is available

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On 01/09/2016 08:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 19:18 +0100, Philip Brown wrote: On 01/09/2016 06:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > and that only MP3 *encoding* was actively pursued by the Fraunhoffer > Insitute and assorted MP3 cartels. MP3 encoding is indeed what Fraunhofer IIS has primarily focused on in the past. The problem is that the decoding

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On 01/09/2016 06:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: mpg123 is available from the rpmfusion repos. Thanks Ed! Is there any side-effect from enabling the

Re: F23: qtox and libsqlchiper

On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:12:28 +0100 Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno ven, 08/01/2016 alle 09.16 -0700, stan ha scritto: > > Perhaps you could put this into copr [1], so other people who might > > want it could find it? > > > > 1. https://fedorahosted.org/copr/ > > yes, this is

pdf-stapler

Dear friends, pdf-stapler has finally made it to the Fedora testing repos on Bodhi. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210 If you are in need of this alternative/workaround to the discontinued pdftk, please test and provide karma feedback. Many thanks, Ranjan -- Important

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

None. I have them enabled myself not a problem. But maybe you'd like to take a look at this article: https://crossingtheair.wordpress.com/2015/12/23/installing-codecs-and-more/ Hope this is useful! Cheers, Sylvia On 09/01/2016, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > mpg123 is available from the rpmfusion repos. > > > Thanks Ed! > > Is there any side-effect from enabling the rpmfusion repos? > Conflict with system

Re: Someone please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 11:57 AM, M. Gelle wrote: My Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 wlan needs backports-ath-2015-11-05.tar.bz2 but I can't download it. My laptop has no wifi. Please help wget http://filebin.ca/2LVgpjSgiT56/backports-ath-2015-11-05.tar.bz2 -- users mailing list

Re: Someone please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 12:12 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 01/09/2016 11:57 AM, M. Gelle wrote: My Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 wlan needs backports-ath-2015-11-05.tar.bz2 but I can't download it. My laptop has no wifi. Please help wget http://filebin.ca/2LVgpjSgiT56/backports-ath-2015-11-05.tar.bz2

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 10:41:21 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Is there any side-effect from enabling the rpmfusion repos? > Conflict with system libs? http://rpmfusion.org/FAQ#How_can_I_trust_that_RPM_Fusion_will_work_with_the_Fedora_project.3F -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Someone or Admin please provide this file

> Hello again, > My Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 needs this file, but the link rejects >> the download. My laptop has no wifi. Please help. >> > > wget http://filebin.ca/2LVgpjSgiT56/backports-ath-2015-11-05.tar.bz2 or >> even browser download is rejected. >> >I have never been to Ubuntu

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

Yes, Joe. I have been getting that message for a while. I posted this to you guys as a last resort, in case someone can email it from their computer. I have nothing to worry about this laptop. This solution seems to have originated from Ubuntu or Debian but I only run Fedora 23 & CentOS 7.2.

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

Sure I did to no avail. Or maybe I don't have much experience. I don't know, that's the reason I posted this. On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > I need the wifi badly. It took me couple of weeks to sort things out. > > Have you visited:

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 05:54 PM, M. Gelle wrote: Hello Brandon, Oh, sure. This's Fedora 23, uname -r output is: 4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 and cat /etc/system-release output is: Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) I also have the original distro kernel as a fallback at boot menu. This's a brand new Lenovo

mplayer cannot play DVD video

Says there is no sound, but I can play other media. Here's the full output: mplayer /dev/sr0 MPlayer 1.2-5.1.1 (C) 2000-2015 MPlayer Team do_connect: could not connect to socket connect: No such file or directory Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control.

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

Hello Brandon, Oh, sure. This's Fedora 23, uname -r output is: 4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 and cat /etc/system-release output is: Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) I also have the original distro kernel as a fallback at boot menu. This's a brand new Lenovo Yoga 700 with an nVidia Optimus that I can't

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

I wish I can offer them a payment but couldn't trust with my CC. That's all they need. Some Fedora or CentOS users must have this same laptop or Asus or Acer and others - they all come with this wlan card. That's why I posted on you guys. Can't some Fedora gurus copy this? Ubuntu users can't be

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:30 PM, M. Gelle wrote: > Well well. Did you try downloading that on your system. That's the only link > and it doesn't work at all. Someone please find an alternative please. > Thanks Can you please provide the Fedora release you are using and the

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 03:22 PM, M. Gelle wrote: Hello again, My Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 needs this file, but the link rejects the download. My laptop has no wifi. Please help. wget http://filebin.ca/2LVgpjSgiT56/backports-ath-2015-11-05.tar.bz2 or even

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 04:37 PM, M. Gelle wrote: Yes, Joe. I have been getting that message for a while. I posted this to you guys as a last resort, in case someone can email it from their computer. I have nothing to worry about this laptop. This solution seems to have originated from Ubuntu or Debian

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

> I need the wifi badly. It took me couple of weeks to sort things out. Have you visited: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/ Usually I find everything I need there about getting particular wireless devices to work (or find that it is hopeless :-). -- users mailing list

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

On 09/01/16 08:02 PM, M. Gelle wrote: > I wish I can offer them a payment but couldn't trust with my CC. That's > all they need. So it's commercial software and you're asking the fedora list to help you get a pirate copy? > Some Fedora or CentOS users must have this same laptop or Asus or Acer

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 06:07 PM, Digimer wrote: On 09/01/16 08:02 PM, M. Gelle wrote: I wish I can offer them a payment but couldn't trust with my CC. That's all they need. So it's commercial software and you're asking the fedora list to help you get a pirate copy? How do you know the driver is

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

Another wifi solution is simply to get one of the cheap USB wifi dongles and give up on the native wifi. Vast numbers of the readily available USB adapters are supported natively in linux (of course, murphy's law dictates that the first one you buy won't be supported :-). -- users mailing list

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

Not easily with this Laptop. Of course, I made one work after disabling a core module that runs the whole Yoga laptop features which wasn't safe. I tried everything I could. But I'm now feeling Happy and hopeful. Thanks all On Saturday, January 9, 2016, Tom Horsley wrote:

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:33 PM, M. Gelle wrote: > Not easily with this Laptop. Of course, I made one work after disabling a > core module that runs the whole Yoga laptop features which wasn't safe. I > tried everything I could. > But I'm now feeling Happy and hopeful.

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

thanks jd1008, Sorry, I thought you new there was only one public download that wasn't working. I'll try this although I thought the file should have been a Linux archive. I'll see if Brandon comes up with another link. Sorry again, for my frustration. Regards, On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:04 PM,

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 05:02 PM, M. Gelle wrote: That's why I posted on you guys. Can't some Fedora gurus copy this? Ubuntu users can't be ahead with this, why? It doesn't matter how much of a guru you are; if the site has a bandwidth limit, it's not going to let anybody download the file until the

Re: XFCE power manager no longer turns off the monitor

Sam Varshavchik writes: On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 08:19 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > At some point recently, my monitor stopped getting turned off after > the   > prescribed period of inactivity. I'm using the XFCE power manager, > and its   > settings remain untouched. > > Manually executing

Someone or Admin please provide this file

No Digimer, it's a file sharing website with bandwidth limit. Would you trust them with your personal or business Credit Card? Most likely it's in overseas. I'm in USA. This file can't be for sale. Don't be a moron. And I did a lot of research before I got to this mailing list in despair as a last

Re: No go: Someone please provide this file

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:12 PM, M. Gelle wrote: > Sorry, I thought you new there was only one public download that wasn't > working. I'll try this although I thought the file should have been a Linux > archive. I'll see if Brandon comes up with another link. Sorry again,

Re: Someone or Admin please provide this file

On 01/09/2016 05:27 PM, M. Gelle wrote: No Digimer, it's a file sharing website with bandwidth limit. Would you trust them with your personal or business Credit Card? Most likely it's in overseas. I'm in USA. This file can't be for sale. Don't be a moron. And I did a lot of research before I got

rpm spec file %define

I have a spec with two source files where I do not create the second, it's not mine: Source0:%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Source1:foo-bar.tar.xz My prep sections looks like: %setup -q %setup -q -T -D -a 1 The tar.xz for Source1 has an unversioned name however it unpacks to a

Re: [Fedora] - No GUI after install bumblebee on Fedora 23

On 9 Jan 2016 06:00, "Earl Ramirez" wrote: > > > > > > It's the kernel logs in particular (journalctl -k) that are of > > interest to debug the 4.3.3 issues. > > > > > > It's made a huge difference to this system with stability and the > > general feel (far more fluid) on