Re: gthumb crash (after enabling vdpau?)

On 03/04/18 11:21, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: I recently replaced my graphics card (with NVIDIA GT 710). A newer nvidia module was installed kmod-nvidia-340xx-4.15.7-200 -> kmod-nvidia-390.42-1 I also enabled VDPAU which was incorrectly installed until now. I now have a failure of 'gthumb': $

Re: Issues trying to lock-down display resolution and overscan

Allegedly, on or about 16 April 2018, Go Canes sent: > why would a power-cycle clear it, while a reboot doesn't? Badly implemented power saving routines in the hardware (graphics chipset in your computer, or the monitor)? Or bad detection of a link between equipment. It reminds me of the number

[389-users] Re: Help with ldapsearch query

It does seem to be permission issue. Thank you. > On Apr 16, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > > On 04/16/2018 01:25 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need to get a list of hosts from 389-ds that have ipaSshPubKey set and I’m >> having trouble

[389-users] Re: Help with ldapsearch query

On 04/16/2018 01:25 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > Hi, > > I need to get a list of hosts from 389-ds that have ipaSshPubKey set > and I’m having trouble contructing that. I’ve tried this: > > ldapsearch -h HOST -b cn=computers,cn=accounts,dc=cnvr,dc=net > 'ipaSshPubKey=*’ It could be an access

[389-users] Re: Help with ldapsearch query

No error per se. I’m just not getting the results I’m expecting. It’s not including some hosts that have ipaSshPubKey set. > On Apr 16, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Leo Pleiman wrote: > > What error are you getting if you run this from the command line? > > Leo Pleiman > Senior

[389-users] Re: Help with ldapsearch query

What error are you getting if you run this from the command line? Leo Pleiman Senior System Engineer Direct 202-787-3622 Cell 410-688-3873 DonorPro merged with Salsa, read about it here. On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Sergei

[389-users] Help with ldapsearch query

Hi, I need to get a list of hosts from 389-ds that have ipaSshPubKey set and I’m having trouble contructing that. I’ve tried this: ldapsearch -h HOST -b cn=computers,cn=accounts,dc=cnvr,dc=net 'ipaSshPubKey=*’ … but that doesn’t seem to work. Am I missing something simple? Thanks,

[389-users] Re: Is it possible to show user only groups he belongs to via ACI

On 04/16/2018 05:17 PM, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote: Hi, Each of our users have DN like uid=xani,ou=users,dc=root,dc=example,dc=com There is also group hierarchy with POSIX groups having users as memberUid I have aci (at the ou=groups): (targetattr = "*") (targetfilter =

Re: F26: xfce -> Mate??

On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 15:52 +, Beartooth wrote: > I've been running Fedora with MATE for years, and much prefer it. > But last week I froze a couple of PCs (by playing carelessly with a > couple of new multi-TB storage drives), and grabbed the first netinstall > medium I could lay

F26: xfce -> Mate??

I've been running Fedora with MATE for years, and much prefer it. But last week I froze a couple of PCs (by playing carelessly with a couple of new multi-TB storage drives), and grabbed the first netinstall medium I could lay hands on. It happened to be F26 with xfce. I'd like to

[389-users] Is it possible to show user only groups he belongs to via ACI

Hi, Each of our users have DN like uid=xani,ou=users,dc=root,dc=example,dc=com There is also group hierarchy with POSIX groups having users as memberUid I have aci (at the ou=groups): (targetattr = "*") (targetfilter = (|(memberUid=xani)(ou=groups))) (version 3.0;acl "test auth";allow

Re: initramfs: kernel update adds unwanted driver?

On 2018-04-14, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > Thus, for the running kernel: > > /bin/kernel-install add $(uname -r) /lib/$(uname -r)/vmlinuz > > It will regenerate the initramfs and eventually other things like the > grub.cfg. > > I tested to add a

Re: Issues trying to lock-down display resolution and overscan

I have had a chance to do some more testing and thinking on these issues On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Go Canes wrote: > The third issue is that sometimes I lose the display more-or-less > completely. I switch the receiver to the NUC, and I get a black >

Re: fedora 27 doesn't support cups administration from the web browser ?

yes ; I think the daemon run regularly... cups.service - CUPS Scheduler Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/cups.service; disabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since Mon 2018-04-16 15:38:12 IDT; 1h 10min ago Docs: man:cupsd(8) Main PID: 857 (cupsd)

Re: fedora 27 doesn't support cups administration from the web browser ?

Le 16/04/2018 à 09:48, Angelo Moreschini a écrit : > Hi, > > after installing fedora 27 I am not able to get the cups administration > from the web browser..(http://localhost:631). Is cupsd daemon running? By default fedora thinks that people don't print and cups is not enabled... > >

Re: 4% battery; dpesn't suspend

On 16/04/18 08:41, Dave Mitchell wrote: > F27. I ran a new laptop battery down to 4% (as claimed by gnome) and my > laptop didn't auto-suspend, nor hibernate. > > In settings / power, the only option for battery power these days seems to > be to automatically suspend after a set time period; not

Re: 4% battery; dpesn't suspend

On 04/16/2018 12:41 AM, Dave Mitchell wrote: F27. I ran a new laptop battery down to 4% (as claimed by gnome) and my laptop didn't auto-suspend, nor hibernate. I was very surprised a few days ago when I left my laptop unplugged and came back to find it powered off. I was expecting that it

fedora 27 doesn't support cups administration from the web browser ?

Hi, after installing fedora 27 I am not able to get the cups administration from the web browser..(http://localhost:631). Looking for help on internet I saw that in the file /etc/cups/cupsd.conf, should be these lines : -- WebInterface Yes # Allow remote access Port 631 and others too,

4% battery; dpesn't suspend

F27. I ran a new laptop battery down to 4% (as claimed by gnome) and my laptop didn't auto-suspend, nor hibernate. In settings / power, the only option for battery power these days seems to be to automatically suspend after a set time period; not at a certain battery level. So a) did I imagine