On 07/22/18 13:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/21/2018 10:20 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>> On 07/21/2018 06:57 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> This makes a rule for that specific PID which becomes invalid the next time
>>> it
>>> starts up. If you've been doing this regularly, I would suggest removing
>>
On 07/21/2018 10:20 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 07/21/2018 06:57 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
This makes a rule for that specific PID which becomes invalid the next
time it starts up. If you've been doing this regularly, I would
suggest removing the old modules.
How do I do that? What modules are y
On 07/21/2018 06:57 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
This makes a rule for that specific PID which becomes invalid the next
time it starts up. If you've been doing this regularly, I would suggest
removing the old modules.
How do I do that? What modules are you speaking of?
On 07/20/2018 08:59 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
# ausearch -c 'geoclue' --raw | audit2allow -M my-geoclue
# semodule -X 300 -i my-geoclue.pp
Gets rid of it for a day.
This makes a rule for that specific PID which becomes invalid the next
time it starts up. If you've been doing this regularly, I
On 07/21/2018 04:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I mentioned motif since in reading back on reports of numpad not working going
back
10 years there were reports of it working with older builds of motif.
I saw that too. That's why I mentioned that it's not directly motif
related now.
Apparently,
On 07/22/18 03:34, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/21/2018 04:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
>> This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
>
> This is a very misleading statement. The numeric pad works fine with Fedora.
> However, the nedit appli
On 07/22/18 02:19, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> I did find the DNS entry for proxy10 being associated with
> http://fedoraproject.org, however the only problem is I should NEVER see an
> arp
> entry for an IP address not on my subnet
>
> and obviously 209.132.181.15 is not on my subnet of 172.18.19.0/24.
It looks like that this issue has already been reported.
https://sourceforge.net/p/nedit/support-requests/15/
>
> On 07/21/2018 04:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
> > This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
>
> This is a very misleading
On 07/21/2018 04:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
This is a very misleading statement. The numeric pad works fine with
Fedora. However, the nedit application does not handle those keys
correctly.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 02:19:27PM -0400, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2018 10:51 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >On 07/20/18 21:19, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> >>looking at the arp table on my system I see that I have one entry that
> >>shouldn't be
> >>there -
> >>
> >>proxy10.fedoraproject.org (209.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:55:58 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I'll be interested to see if both stay up for several days now,
> or perhaps the router keeps crashing, but at least the system stays
> up. (In which case it is time for new router I guess, or at least time
> to check for new router firmware)
On 07/20/2018 10:51 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/20/18 21:19, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
looking at the arp table on my system I see that I have one entry that
shouldn't be
there -
proxy10.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.15) at 50:3d:e5:f5:b6:c0 [ether] on
enp0s25
First, the subnet this machine liv
On 07/22/18 01:41, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/21/2018 04:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
>> This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
>
> Desktop or laptop? What layout? What keyboard?
Seems this is a long standing problem. Google searche
> On 07/21/2018 04:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
> > This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
>
> Desktop or laptop? What layout? What keyboard?
There is not difference, I have the issue with both, with any french keyboards
> __
On 07/21/2018 10:37 AM, Alex wrote:
It appears to make no difference. I also removed entirely the
/var/cache/dnf directory and tried again. The modules.yaml file is
missing, but it's also not present on a system that does succeed in
finding this package.
The modules.yaml is for the new modules
On 07/21/2018 04:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
Desktop or laptop? What layout? What keyboard?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 07/21/2018 01:32 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Doing:
rpm -qf /usr/share/texmf
I get
texlive-base-2016-33.20160520.fc26.1.noarch
R-core-3.4.4-1.fc26.x86_64
showing that /usr/share/texmf
belongs to 2 different packages.
As an aside, this isn't necessarily a problem. It's allowed for
multiple pa
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/20/2018 12:06 PM, Alex wrote:
>>
>> What more can be done to troubleshoot this?
>
>
> Try running "dnf info -v --refresh perl-Encode".
It appears to make no difference. I also removed entirely the
/var/cache/dnf directory and tried again
On 07/21/2018 01:32 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Doing:
rpm -qf /usr/share/texmf
I get
texlive-base-2016-33.20160520.fc26.1.noarch
R-core-3.4.4-1.fc26.x86_64
showing that /usr/share/texmf
belongs to 2 different packages.
How can I remove it from one package?
You can't. That's part of the rpm info
Hello,
The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmos
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 15:35 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 05:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 06:26 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > > On 07/16/2018 04:46 AM, Tom Yates wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Where do I
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 16:10 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/20/2018 03:35 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 07/16/2018 05:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 06:26 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > > > On 07/16/2018 04:46 AM, Tom Yates wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018,
Hello,
Doing:
rpm -qf /usr/share/texmf
I get
texlive-base-2016-33.20160520.fc26.1.noarch
R-core-3.4.4-1.fc26.x86_64
showing that /usr/share/texmf
belongs to 2 different packages.
How can I remove it from one package?
This gives an issue when I try to update my distribution.
My Best.
==
On 07/21/2018 12:20 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 8:05 AM
From: "Samuel Sieb"
It's not the same bug. In this case, it's R-core that's conflicting.
R-core should not be owning that directory. It requires texlive, so the
directory will already exist. There was a r
> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 8:05 AM
> From: "Samuel Sieb"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Bug 1577224
>
> On 07/20/2018 10:43 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Updating from fedora 26 to feora 28, I get the error:
> > Error: Transaction check error:
> >file /usr/share/tex
25 matches
Mail list logo
