Re: how do I use gunzip with dd?

On 9/24/19 9:14 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: You need to complicate up your partition structure and try it again. # parted /dev/sdb GNU Parted 3.2 Using /dev/sdb Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) print Model: Samsung Type-C (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

William, You are right. I remember the blank line. I will try that in the morning when I am fresh. Thanks for your help Bob -Original Message- From: William Brown [mailto:wbr...@suse.de] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 20:58 To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [389-users]

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

Okay, so you need to create the domain objects then. I'm not sure your ldapadd file is correct though, I think you need a blank line between the two entries? > On 24 Sep 2019, at 12:55, rtb...@granitemountain.com wrote: > > William, > > The result was the same except that the base was >

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

William, The result was the same except that the base was with scope subtree instead of with scope subtree Bob -Original Message- From: William Brown [mailto:wbr...@suse.de] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 20:43 To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [389-users] Re:

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

You need to quote it because else the shell thinks it's two arguments? > On 24 Sep 2019, at 12:31, rtb...@granitemountain.com > wrote: > > William - > > I did it with this command: > ldapsearch -b dc=granitemountain, dc=com -h $HOSTNAME -x -D 'cn=Directory > Manager' -W > > The results

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

William - I did it with this command: ldapsearch -b dc=granitemountain, dc=com -h $HOSTNAME -x -D 'cn=Directory Manager' -W The results were: # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base with scope subtree # filter: dc=com # requesting: ALL # # search: results search: 2 result: 32 No such object #

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

Can you do an ldapsearch -b dc=granitemountain, dc=com -h ... -x -D ... -W and see what exists already? > On 24 Sep 2019, at 10:39, rtb...@granitemountain.com > wrote: > > William, > > I was trying it as you suggested. It now gets past the password issue. > However, I am not hitting

Re: how do I use gunzip with dd?

On 9/23/19 5:17 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 9/23/19 4:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 9/23/19 12:45 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 9/22/19 11:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Digging through my history (which I did not think I still had): # dd status=progress bs=4096 if=/dev/sdb | gzip

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

William, I was trying it as you suggested. It now gets past the password issue. However, I am not hitting another roadblock. The original entries in the file I created are: dn: dc=granitemountain, dc=com objectClass: domain dc: granitemountain dn: dc=pki,

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

Can you try the -f /file/of/changes rather than redirecting into the command? > On 24 Sep 2019, at 10:16, rtb...@granitemountain.com wrote: > > William, thanks for responding. In the original command string I used -w > redhat123 instead of -W which causes a prompt for the password. In both >

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

William, thanks for responding. In the original command string I used -w redhat123 instead of -W which causes a prompt for the password. In both cases, I got the same error. -Original Message- From: William Brown [mailto:wbr...@suse.de] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 18:12 To:

[389-users] Re: Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

> On 24 Sep 2019, at 09:46, rtb...@granitemountain.com > wrote: > > I have hit a roadblock and would appreciate any help I can get. I am running > in a VM Workstation virtualization platform on a Windows 10 host machine. > > I created a LAMP version of Fedora 30 using mariadb instead of

[389-users] Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

I have hit a roadblock and would appreciate any help I can get. I am running in a VM Workstation virtualization platform on a Windows 10 host machine. I created a LAMP version of Fedora 30 using mariadb instead of mysql. I changed the host name to cn-poc-pki.granitemountain.com rebooted the

[389-users] Configuring the 389-ds-base on Fedora 30

I have hit a roadblock and would appreciate any help I can get. I am running in a VM Workstation virtualization platform on a Windows 10 host machine. I created a LAMP version of Fedora 30 using mariadb instead of mysql. I changed the host name to cn-poc-pki.granitemountain.com rebooted the

Re: Notifications

On 9/23/19 10:42 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:32 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote: On 9/23/19 9:43 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: > for LXDE based system which user should I use? > I can't see lxdm on  fedora lxde  spin. Use the "ps" ("ps

[389-users] Re: sudoers tree missing on a 389-ds replica

The compat plugin was disabled. After enabling, issue was fixed. Hope it helps somebody. > On Sep 23, 2019, at 12:12 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > > Looking closer, I see that the sudorules,dc=DC,dc=DC is there, but the combat > tree (ou=sudoers,dc=DC,dc=DC) is not. Do you maintain the compat

Re: Notifications

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:32 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 9/23/19 9:43 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: > > for LXDE based system which user should I use? > > I can't see lxdm on fedora lxde spin. > > Use the "ps" ("ps auxw | less" is what I usually use) command to see > what process is running, maybe

[389-users] Re: sudoers tree missing on a 389-ds replica

Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > Looking closer, I see that the sudorules,dc=DC,dc=DC is there, but the combat > tree (ou=sudoers,dc=DC,dc=DC) is not. Do you maintain the compat plugin? The freeIPA team maintains the slapi-compat plugin. I gather you aren't using this in the context of freeIPA? rob >

[389-users] Re: sudoers tree missing on a 389-ds replica

Looking closer, I see that the sudorules,dc=DC,dc=DC is there, but the combat tree (ou=sudoers,dc=DC,dc=DC) is not. Do you maintain the compat plugin? > On Sep 23, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > > Hello, > > I’ve run into an interesting situatuion with the sudoers tree in

Re: Notifications

On 9/23/19 9:43 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: for LXDE based system which user should I use? I can't see lxdm on  fedora lxde  spin. Use the "ps" ("ps auxw | less" is what I usually use) command to see what process is running, maybe lightdm. When you find it, you will see which user it is

Re: KDE on Fedora 30/31

On Sun, 2019-09-22 at 11:38 +0100, John Pilkington wrote: > On 21/09/2019 22:37, Alex Gurenko via users wrote: > > I only have one problem and That's sound not working over HDMI on > > my > > laptop. Assist from that no issues since F27. Prior to that there > > were > > some problems here and

Re: Notifications

for LXDE based system which user should I use? I can't see lxdm on fedora lxde spin. On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 12:15 PM Danishka Navin wrote: > Thanks Samuel. > It worked! > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> On 8/6/19 12:13 PM, Danishka Navin wrote: >> > Imagine no user

[SOLVED] rsync oddity

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:49:27 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote: > Hi all, > > when doing an rsync of /home to a remote host with options > "--stats -av --hard-links --delete-during" I get > > sending incremental file list > cannot delete non-empty directory: >

[389-users] Re: sudoers tree missing on a 389-ds replica

On 9/23/19 11:15 AM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: Hello, I’ve run into an interesting situatuion with the sudoers tree in 389-ds. All the nodes in the 389-ds cluster have it, but one doesn’t. I’ve tried dumping the database on a good node with db2ldif and reloading on the bad node with ldif2db,

rsync oddity

Hi all, when doing an rsync of /home to a remote host with options "--stats -av --hard-links --delete-during" I get sending incremental file list cannot delete non-empty directory: frank/.sylpheed-2.0/imapcache/c64.shuttle.de/frank cannot delete non-empty directory:

[389-users] sudoers tree missing on a 389-ds replica

Hello, I’ve run into an interesting situatuion with the sudoers tree in 389-ds. All the nodes in the 389-ds cluster have it, but one doesn’t. I’ve tried dumping the database on a good node with db2ldif and reloading on the bad node with ldif2db, but the situation is not changing. I’ve also

Bind my personal shell program to open only a specific text file extension (and not all text/plain files)

I have a my personal application (~/bin/launch-app) that read a text file with .app extension (myapp.app) and run some stuff of things Since the myapp.app is a text file ... [lesca@dodo tmp]$ file myapp.app myapp.app: ASCII text if I try bind this file to my program launch-app via nemo,

Re: how do I use gunzip with dd?

On 9/23/19 4:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 9/23/19 12:45 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 9/22/19 11:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Digging through my history (which I did not think I still had): # dd status=progress bs=4096 if=/dev/sdb | gzip -v > DeadStick.FC30_$(date

Re: grub regression in f30

On 31/08/2019 23:03, Tom Horsley wrote: On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:54:08 +0200 François Patte wrote: I use the nvidia driver from rpm-fusion, nouveau does not work with my card. I've never seen the nvidia drive do a high resolution at boot time, only after X starts. The nouveau driver does the

Re: how do I use gunzip with dd?

On 9/23/19 12:45 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 9/22/19 11:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Digging through my history (which I did not think I still had): # dd status=progress bs=4096 if=/dev/sdb | gzip -v > DeadStick.FC30_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).dd.gz This is a 64 GB stick.  It compressed down

Re: is the mailing list mangling email character-encoding

On 9/23/19 3:39 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Ed sent his message in Unicode with NFC normalization (the é is pre-composed) and UTF-8. Tim's message contains two ?, indicating a pair of unknown characters. One possibility is that Tim's MUA (Evolution) converts that to NFD normalization and

Re: how do I use gunzip with dd?

On 9/22/19 11:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Digging through my history (which I did not think I still had): # dd status=progress bs=4096 if=/dev/sdb | gzip -v > DeadStick.FC30_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).dd.gz This is a 64 GB stick.  It compressed down to 4 GB, which made senses most of the

Re: is the mailing list mangling email character-encoding

Tom Horsley writes: > Some of the messages show the international characters, In this thread, those are Ed's. > and some do not. Tim's. > It would be interesting to examine the detailed headers of the > message where the characters disappeared, I looked in my local folder, and there's

Re: how do I use gunzip with dd?

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:50 AM Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 21Sep2019 23:24, ToddAndMargo wrote: >> On 9/21/19 10:02 PM, Derrik Walker v2.0 wrote: >>> >>> Try replacing gunzip with zcat. >> >> Worked. Thank you! > > FFS. The gzip folks are back to this hubris? When it first came out > they

Re: is the mailing list mangling email character-encoding

Ed Greshko writes: > Yes.  For some reason I can't fathom it seems the mailing list > software turns every Content-Transfer-Encoding to base64 It's just "old fashioned stupidity" far beyond the ken of today's users inexperienced with the details of the global mail system. Let me explain.

Re: how do I use gunzip with dd?

On 9/22/19 10:33 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 9/23/19 1:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 9/22/19 6:06 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 9/22/19 5:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: The same dd restored perfects to another stick. I do believe want went wrong as the partition structures not being