Hi All,
Anyone know of a substitute /usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor
that will show IO, like iotop, but with a gui?
Many thanks,
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 15:55 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
> If the CMOS battery is going bad, there will be a lot more problems
> than just losing the settings of one drive! If none of the other
> settings are giving trouble, it's not the battery.
I do wonder about that. How many BIOS settings are igno
On 6/1/20 4:10 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am confused by this process as well. If I issue the command efibootmgr
-v I get the following output, and, I don't understand how that
information relates to the segmented disk image that is being used when
Fedora is run from a virtualbox vm running un
On 6/1/20 4:05 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 2/6/20 3:44 am, stan via users wrote:
Check /etc/default/grub on the F32 system, and make sure that all the
entries are correct for the F32 system. It needs to have
GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG=true
somewhere in there so that boot loader snippets will work.
G
On 6/1/20 3:25 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
What I would like is to have an automatic removing of my own packages
telling me which packages have been removed.
Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command and check the list of removed
packages. It will also be in the dnf history.
_
On 2/6/20 12:10 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 11:20:31AM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
with the -v option, I have
BootCurrent:
Timeout: 1 seconds
BootOrder: ,0002,0001
Boot* fedora
HD(3,GPT,a5c3bc11-e83b-48d0-be96-783af37228f1,0x2001800,0xfa000)/File(\EF
On 2/6/20 3:44 am, stan via users wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:23:26 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
Thanks,
Actually, I am lost.
I am upgrading one of the systems on a multi-disks system.
1) I realized that one system is not efi, while the other ones are.
2) After I upgraded this system. I can
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:47 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/1/20 12:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > So I want to dual boot Windows 10 and Fedora on my MS Surface GO but the
> > funky Microsoft UEFI REALLY doesn't like grub.
>
> In what way? The UEFI boot shouldn't care what you're booting. It just
On 29/5/20 7:38 pm, Stephen Morris wrote:
HI,
I have a config file in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d to start up DM's on
Xorg in 4K monitor resolution, as in F31 both Xorg and Wayland would
start up in 800x600 resolution and I would then have to minimize then
maximize the VM window for the DM to swi
Hello,
What I would like is to have an automatic removing of my own packages
telling me which packages have been removed.
Then I will rebuild my packages.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@
On 06/01/2020 03:21 PM, George N. White III wrote:
Best case is that the BIOS settings (which are maintained in CMOS by a
replaceable battery) were lost due to failure of the battery (there are
lots of youtube videos for Lenovo CMOS battery replacement).
If the CMOS battery is going bad, there
On 6/1/20 2:15 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Every time that I upgrade my system I have to do remove
all my own packages (40).
If they are compiled against versions of libraries that are getting
replaced, then yes. You could setup a vm to compile the libraries on
the new release and include those
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 12:58, Neal Becker wrote:
> Thanks for all the suggestions. Just to review, the issue was the drive
> didn't even appear in lsblk, so nothing can be done to fix it.
>
until you find a way to make it visible to linux.The ATA1 you mentioned
is a hint that the BIOS may ha
Every time that I upgrade my system I have to do remove
all my own packages (40).
Would dnf module reset \*
do the job?
This is really annoying.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
This has been solved by
rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 4
On 6/1/20 2:00 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
running:
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32
I get:
Modular dependency problem:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64
This can be ignored. dnf w
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
running:
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32
I get:
Modular dependency problem:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64
This can be solved by
Hello,
running:
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32
I get:
Modular dependency problem:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64
Error:
Problem 1: package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64
On 6/1/20 12:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
So I want to dual boot Windows 10 and Fedora on my MS Surface GO but the
funky Microsoft UEFI REALLY doesn't like grub.
In what way? The UEFI boot shouldn't care what you're booting. It just
takes the signed boot binary and runs it.
__
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:09:36 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> When the policy is not being followed and/or not enforced it means
> nothing. Only someone who is in love with
> the policy would say otherwise and actively defend it.
You're still not getting it.
> I am going to guess you helped write la
On 6/1/20 1:20 PM, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
I am new to Fedora, and am happy about it. I installed Fedora 32 and was
offered to "install" third party repositories by the Software
application. There is one repository included in this list, which
contains the Pycharm IDE software. I have 2 qu
hello,
I am new to Fedora, and am happy about it. I installed Fedora 32 and was
offered to "install" third party repositories by the Software
application. There is one repository included in this list, which
contains the Pycharm IDE software. I have 2 questions:
1. What can you gain from ins
On 2020-06-01 10:37, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
The new user must have the EXPORT variable set to :0
export DISPLAY=:0
Replying to myself to fix a mistake that would remain in the ML archives.
The new user must have an exported DISPLAY variable set to :0
export DISPLAY=:0
--
Roberto Ragus
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:13:35 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> So I want to dual boot Windows 10 and Fedora on my MS Surface GO but
> the funky Microsoft UEFI REALLY doesn't like grub.
>
> I've read up a bit on systemd-boot and found references that it
> should work with the Surface GO but one of the r
On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:28:46 -0400
Kevin Becker wrote:
> My system has two efi boot partitions on separate drives. I rarely
> boot to Windows and I wanted it on its own completely separate
> drive. I configured a default in the firmware settings and then for a
> while I would choose an alternat
So I want to dual boot Windows 10 and Fedora on my MS Surface GO but the
funky Microsoft UEFI REALLY doesn't like grub.
I've read up a bit on systemd-boot and found references that it should work
with the Surface GO but one of the requirements is that the kernel be
compiled to be compatible with E
My system has two efi boot partitions on separate drives. I rarely
boot to Windows and I wanted it on its own completely separate
drive. I configured a default in the firmware settings and then for a
while I would choose an alternate when I needed to by hitting a key to
bring up the efi boot menu
Hello,
I guess that very think is more or less, OK, I have just some difficulties
to understand the logic.
> How does the efi firmware decide which /boot/efi to use as the source when
> the computer is started
I realized that I have only one EFI System Partition on sda
By default, the system goe
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 10:10:41 -0400
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> If you see in the Fedora entry, it has:
> HD(3,GPT,a5c3bc11-e83b-48d0-be96-783af37228f1,0x2001800\
> ,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\FEDORA\GRUBX64.EFI)
>
> That means to look for a volume with the 3rd GPT partition, with the
> UUID of a5c3bc11-e8
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:23:26 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> Actually, I am lost.
> I am upgrading one of the systems on a multi-disks system.
> 1) I realized that one system is not efi, while the other ones are.
> 2) After I upgraded this system. I can boot it, but it is weird.
> a) T
When the policy is not being followed and/or not enforced it means
nothing. Only someone who is in love with
the policy would say otherwise and actively defend it. I am going to
guess you helped write large parts of the policy
and that is why you defined it. Yes, lets enforce the policy against
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:36 PM George N. White III
wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 13:17, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> I installed Fedora 32 on an SD card on my MS Surface GO. I can get it to
>> boot up fine (but the surface has a funky UEFI bios) but no Wifi.
>>
>
> Normally dmesg should give som
On 6/1/20 3:05 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32
make the upgrade through internet
How can I do the same from a .iso file ?
You can't.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Thanks for all the suggestions. Just to review, the issue was the drive
didn't even appear in lsblk, so nothing can be done to fix it.
It is possible it was partially failing, it seems after multiple windows
reboots and repairs it is working again, although
at least one app had to be reinstalled.
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 01:23, Michael Hennebry <
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2020, George N. White III wrote:
>
> > Have you tried the vga= kernel boot parameter? For Xwindows it would be
> > good to get something other than VESA running, either i915 or by adding a
> >
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 11:20:31AM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> with the -v option, I have
> BootCurrent:
> Timeout: 1 seconds
> BootOrder: ,0002,0001
> Boot* fedora
> HD(3,GPT,a5c3bc11-e83b-48d0-be96-783af37228f1,0x2001800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\FEDORA\GRUBX64.EFI)
> [...]
> Howeve
Thanks,
Actually, I am lost.
I am upgrading one of the systems on a multi-disks system.
1) I realized that one system is not efi, while the other ones are.
2) After I upgraded this system. I can boot it, but it is weird.
a) There was no update of the grub menu (I boot fc32, while the invitation
is
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:20:31 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> If I run
> grubby --info=ALL
>
> I get only the boot system available on the mounted system
>
> What bothers me also is the date of /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
> -rwx--. 1 root root 15119 Jun 9 2019
>
> I can regenerate it and
Hi Roberto
You are 'da man!
this worked xhost si:localuser:test
using this in the "root" term window,
and then running the cmd to fire up the test firefox browser generated
the process.
when i now run "xhost" from the root term, i see the different values.
I suppose I can "safely" delete
On 2020-05-31 22:12, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you rebooted, then the runaway script is gone and won't be
affecting anything. I'm confused how you say some things can run
aplay and make audio, but you can't run it directly.
_
°
Yes, confusing to me too, I try only to query when I reach th
On 2020-06-01 12:31, bruce wrote:
Hi Roberto
Thanks for the reply.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:38 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
xhost si:localuser:thenameofthenewuser
xhost si:root:test
"localuser" is a string that you do not have to change, it specifies the kind
of rule
we are doing.
Try
Hi Roberto
Thanks for the reply.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:38 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-01 05:35, bruce wrote:
>
> > However, if I fire up a term as another user, and then from the
> > cmdline, fire up chromium, I get an err msg
> >
> > No protocol specified
> > Gtk-WARNING **: ca
Hello,
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32
make the upgrade through internet
How can I do the same from a .iso file ?
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdi
Thank again,
with the -v option, I have
BootCurrent:
Timeout: 1 seconds
BootOrder: ,0002,0001
Boot* fedora
HD(3,GPT,a5c3bc11-e83b-48d0-be96-783af37228f1,0x2001800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\FEDORA\GRUBX64.EFI)
Boot0001* Hard DriveBBS(HD,,0x0)..GO..NOo.I.N.T.E.L.
.S.S.D.S.
> On 5/31/20 10:41 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
>> Just upgraded a machine and noticed that with version
>> 30, when I had a process running in a terminal window,
>> when it completed it would report that the command
>> finished, and would provide the scripts name. After the
>> upgrade
On 2020-06-01 05:35, bruce wrote:
However, if I fire up a term as another user, and then from the
cmdline, fire up chromium, I get an err msg
No protocol specified
Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0
I've been researching trying to figure out how to resolve this.
The new user must have
On 5/31/20 8:35 PM, bruce wrote:
Trying to understand/figure out some things.
I've logged in as root
I can start a browser -- FF, or chromium, no issue. (I know.. I
shouldn't. but I can.
However, if I fire up a term as another user, and then from the
cmdline, fire up chromium, I get an err msg
47 matches
Mail list logo
