Networking problem

On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on specific ports from some machines on the LAN. However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60 -j ACCEPT After restarting the firewall, I still am unable to ping that machin

RE: Networking problem

...@lists.fedoraproject.org [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD [jd1...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 9:36 AM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Networking problem On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on specific ports from some machines

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: > On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on > specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > > However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: > > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60 -j ACCEPT > > After restarting the fi

Re: Networking problem

ty support for Fedora users > Subject: Networking problem > > On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on > specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > > However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: > > -A INPUT -s 19

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: >> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on >> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. >> >> However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: >> >> -A INPUT -s

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:27 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: >>> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on >>> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. >>> >>> However, for one machine I made a general rule to

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > > On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: > >> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on > >> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > >> > >> However, for one machine I mad

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 12:17 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > mum_icmp_type=${#icmp_types[@]} > Typo - above should obviously be: num_icmp_type -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:49 AM, JD wrote: > > -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT > -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT > > And no, I cannot ssh even though on the Fedora machine sshd is running on > both my Fedora and the machine at 192.168.1.60 > > In that case you need to publish all

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on specific ports from some machines on the LAN.

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 09:34, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:49 AM, JD wrote: > >> -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT >> -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT >> >> And no, I cannot ssh even though on the Fedora machine sshd is running on >> both my Fedora and the machine at 192.168.1.60

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:36 AM, JD wrote: > On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on > specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > > However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: > > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60 -j ACCEPT > > After restart

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, 14 May 2011 13:49:34 -0500, DD wrote: > 2. iptables problems can be difficult to debug without seeing all the rules, > since the order of the rules is so important. I know you are worried about > security, but you'll need to show them to someone you trust if you can't > solve tis yourself

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: > On Fedora Machine: > # /bin/netstat -rn > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt > Iface > 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 11:49, Dale Dellutri wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:36 AM, JD wrote: >> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on >> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. >> >> However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: >> >> -A I

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: > >> On Fedora Machine: >> # /bin/netstat -rn >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt >> Iface >> 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:08 AM, JD wrote: > Thank you Dale. > I can tell you that the counts do not change!! > > I will seek the help of a friend. Before you do you might consider going to the Fedora Forum at http://www.fedorafourm.org and asking in the Security forum. This will give you input from Fed

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: > >> On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > >>> On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: > On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connect

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 02:13 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: >>> >> >> .. >> >>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43 >>> inet6 addr: fe80::234:56ff:fe00:343/64 Scope:Link >>> wlan0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWadd

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 12:55, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 02:13 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: >>> .. >>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43 inet6 addr: fe80::234:56ff:fe00:343/64 Scope:Lin

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 12:55, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: >>> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: >> On my F14, I am running

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 04:27 PM, JD wrote: ded the rule > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j ACCEPT > and retried. > Same thing. > both machines can ping the GW, and they can ping a third machine I have > on the LAN. > But they cannot ping each other. > I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to pi

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 12:55, Rick Sewill wrote: > > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: > >> On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > >>> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > > On 0

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 16:10, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 12:55, Rick Sewill wrote: >>> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 08

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 07:10 PM, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: > This setup sounds like wifi bridge mode as opposed to wifi ad-hoc mode. > > Question: in wifi bridging, does the packet from the Powerbook, > which is destined for the Fedora, go through the gateway, >

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:13 PM, JD wrote: > > The eth0 is not active. It is configured with a static IP, but it is > disconnected. > > Ditto on the PowerBook machine. It is configured with a static IP > but is is disconnected, so the ether links on both machines is down. > Only the wireless is ac

Re: Networking problem

Dear JD, On 14/05/11 06:36 -0700, JD wrote: >On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection >on specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > >However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: > >-A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60 -j ACCEPT The -A means *appen

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 16:46, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 07:10 PM, Rick Sewill wrote: >> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: >> This setup sounds like wifi bridge mode as opposed to wifi ad-hoc mode. >> >> Question: in wifi bridging, does the packet from the Powerbook, >> which is dest

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: > I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora > from Powerbook. No go!! That means that it's not a firewall issue. Check your router config to see if it's set to allow pings inside the LAN. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora >> from Powerbook. No go!! > That means that it's not a firewall issue. Check your router config to > see if it's set to allow pings inside the LAN. Thanx!

Re: Networking problem

On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora >>> from Powerbook. No go!! >> That means that it's not a firewall issue. Check your router config to >> see if it's set t

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 09:45 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora from Powerbook. No go!! >>> That means that it's not a firewall iss

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora from Powerbook. No go!! >>> That means that it's not a firewall issue.

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 12:55 AM, JD wrote: <> > Perhaps it is an unpublished feature. > > Gues it is time to call the that horrible customer service bureaucracy! you do not mention which model, therefore a search from here may help; http://support.2wire.com/index.php if a 2701; http://support.2wi

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: >> On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: > I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora > from Powerbook. No go!! Th

Re: Networking problem

On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: >>> On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 19:41, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: >>> On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried t

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 19:59, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>> I al

Re: Networking problem

On 5/14/11 8:42 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 19:41, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>> I also brought t

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 19:09, g wrote: > On 05/15/2011 12:55 AM, JD wrote: > <> > >> Perhaps it is an unpublished feature. >> >> Gues it is time to call the that horrible customer service bureaucracy! > you do not mention which model, therefore a search from here may help; > > http://support.2wire.com/ind

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >> Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router >> as the gateway? >> >> As I recall, LAN traffic assumes that anything sent on the local >> interface will get directly to anything else on the local network by >> just sending it. I'm no

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:53 PM, JD wrote: > It is model 3800HGV-B O, Bad URL 192.168.1.254 is a non-route-able Internet address. It only works on *your* network -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.frami

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:59 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > I'm suggesting that you either have: > > 192.168.1.108 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0 UG wlan0 Oops, the Genmask above should have been 255.255.255.255 ... my bad. > 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U wlan0 > 0.0.0.0

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 20:53, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 8:42 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 19:41, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 05/14/

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:59 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>>

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >>> Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router >>> as the gateway? >>> >>> As I recall, LAN traffic assumes that anything sent on the local >>> interface will get directly to anything else

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 21:01, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:53 PM, JD wrote: >> It is model 3800HGV-B > O, Bad URL 192.168.1.254 is a non-route-able Internet address. > It only works on *your* network > :) That is weird!! When I copied and pa

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router as the gateway? As I recall, LAN traffic assumes that anything sent on the local int

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Shane Dawalt wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:59 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > > On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: > >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > > On 05/14/11 18:2

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 21:28, Shane Dawalt wrote: > On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: > Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router > as the gateway? > > As I recall, LAN traffic a

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 12:45 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 21:28, Shane Dawalt wrote: >> On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >> Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router >> as the gatewa

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 22:02, Shane Dawalt wrote: > On 05/15/2011 12:45 AM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 21:28, Shane Dawalt wrote: >>> On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >>> Can you add a "special" static route between th

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 03:53 AM, JD wrote: <> > It is model 3800HGV-B 3800HGV-B is what i was looking for. kevin's reply answered for ip address. i tried searching '2wire.com' site, but now that 'pace' has bought them out, all info that was available before is now p

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 04:40 AM, JD wrote: <> > Sorry! > My bad. not as bad as not trimming 'dead wood' or slipping off to 'html' and breaking thread i am trying to keep up with and learn something. from what i have read in 2701 pdf that i found, still 1 general uverse pdf missing, i do not believe that

Re: Networking problem

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:39 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 22:02, Shane Dawalt wrote: >> >> Usually, firewalls don't inhibit ARP entries. To test this theory, >> try "ping 192.168.1.70" from your 192.168.1.108 box.  Directly after >> that, issue the command "arp -a".  If ARP works, you should see >>

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 11:48 -0400, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60/32 -j ACCEPT > > there needs to be a netmask in the syntax. No there doesn't. That's a rule being set for a specific IP, not a subnet range of addresses. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 11:45:47 PM JD wrote: ... > Well, that bridge is the router. > Wireless clients that are associated with an Access Point > in "infrastructure" mode cannot directly talk to each other. > Their traffic must flow through the router. > If I had set the two computers to use Ad

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 00:13, g wrote: > On 05/15/2011 03:53 AM, JD wrote: > <> > >> It is model 3800HGV-B > 3800HGV-B is what i was looking for. kevin's reply answered for ip address. > > i tried searching '2wire.com' site, but now that 'pace' has bought them out, > all

Re: Networking problem

Quoting JD : >> Usually, firewalls don't inhibit ARP entries. To test this theory, >> try "ping 192.168.1.70" from your 192.168.1.108 box. Directly after >> that, issue the command "arp -a". If ARP works, you should see >> something like this. >> >> ? (10.1.1.1) at 00:30:ab:13:9e:3d [ether]

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 08:41, sdaw...@donet.com wrote: > Keep in mind that the table shown above from the powerbook doesn't > say it is reporting the Fedora machine. The powerbook is reporting > that it attempted to obtain the MAC address for the host at > 192.168.1.108, but it didn't receive a reply.

Re: Networking problem

JD gmail.com> writes: > ... Have you tried this link layer (layer 2) "ping" ? http://sourceforge.net/projects/linkloop/ http://linux.die.net/man/1/linkloop JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 10:48, JB wrote: > JD gmail.com> writes: > >> ... > Have you tried this link layer (layer 2) "ping" ? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linkloop/ > > http://linux.die.net/man/1/linkloop > > JB > > It is a broken program. I can ping my router, but when I provide the router's MAC addr

Re: Networking problem

JB gmail.com> writes: > M1 192.168.1.x/24 eth? | = | 192.168.1.254/24 wireless router ^^ ^

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 17:35, JB wrote: > JB gmail.com> writes: > >> > M1 > 192.168.1.x/24 > eth? > | > = > | > 192.168.1.254/24 wireless router > ^

Re: Networking problem

JD gmail.com> writes: > ... - on Fedora machine: start tcpdump on both interfaces wlan0 and wlan0:0, with -w capture.out ping -c 2 192.168.1.70 kill ping if needed kill tcpdump (Ctl-c) What interface the packets was out on ? Did they get out at all ? Show us tpcdump statistics (

Re: Networking problem

JD gmail.com> writes: > ... On Fedora (192.168.1.108): Give us the outputs: $ cat /etc/sysconfig/network $ ls /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ Any route files e.g. route-wlan0 ? If yes, then: $ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-* You said you had had trouble modifying routing table on Fe

Re: Networking problem

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:35 PM, JB wrote: > JB gmail.com> writes: > On Powerbook machine > > # /sbin/netstat -rn > Routing tables > Internet: > Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire > default            192.168.1.254      UGSc        8        0    en1 > 127

Re: Networking problem

On 05/16/11 23:42, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:35 PM, JB wrote: >> JB gmail.com> writes: >> On Powerbook machine >> >> # /sbin/netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> Internet: >> DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire >> default192.168.1.254

Re: Networking problem

Tom H gmail.com> writes: > ... > > Let's try a ping from Fedora to Powerbook. > > > > snip > > > > But, the situation is curious, because we have ping's IPv4-format packet > > with > > FROM IPv4 address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface > > If you're referring to "192.168.1

Re: Networking problem

On 05/17/11 04:25, JB wrote: > Tom H gmail.com> writes: > >> ... >>> Let's try a ping from Fedora to Powerbook. >>> >>> snip >>> >>> But, the situation is curious, because we have ping's IPv4-format packet >>> with >>> FROM IPv4 address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface >> I

Re: Networking problem

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, JB wrote: > Tom H gmail.com> writes: >> If you're referring to "192.168.1.254 0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" as "FROM IPv4 >> address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface" then >> no. "0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" is the MAC address of "192.168.1.254". > No, I was re

Re: Networking problem

On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, JB wrote: >> Tom H gmail.com> writes: >>> If you're referring to "192.168.1.254 0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" as "FROM IPv4 >>> address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface" then >>> no. "0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" is the MAC addres

Re: Networking problem

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: >> To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" >> and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"? What are their >> contents? > > I have no  /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0 >

Re: Networking problem

On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: > >>> To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" >>> and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"? What are their >>> contents? >> I have no /etc/sysc

Re: Networking problem

On 05/19/2011 07:06 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: >> To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"? What are th

Re: Networking problem

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD  wrote: >>> On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/11 12:19, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: >>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JDwrote: On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: > To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" > and a "/etc/sysc

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/2011 01:05 PM, JD wrote: > Well, I do not need a mail server. I would have to fight with > at&t to open up port 25 for me. No you wouldn't. You'd tell sendmail to use the AT&T mail server as a smarthost and pass all of your outgoing mail through it. I know, because I have a cron job t

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/11 13:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/21/2011 01:05 PM, JD wrote: >> Well, I do not need a mail server. I would have to fight with >> at&t to open up port 25 for me. > No you wouldn't. You'd tell sendmail to use the AT&T mail server as a > smarthost and pass all of your outgoing mail through

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/2011 02:00 PM, JD wrote: > I can configure sendmail to run with some specific smarthost. > That is my main problem. > It is that I have no domain name nor a public mx record, > and even if I did, I would have to deal with all the spam :) So get yourself a domain name; it's not that expens

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/11 14:15, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/21/2011 02:00 PM, JD wrote: >> I can configure sendmail to run with some specific smarthost. >> That is my main problem. >> It is that I have no domain name nor a public mx record, >> and even if I did, I would have to deal with all the spam :) > So get yo

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:19 -0700, JD wrote: > On 05/21/11 14:15, Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 05/21/2011 02:00 PM, JD wrote: > >> I can configure sendmail to run with some specific smarthost. > >> That is my main problem. > >> It is that I have no domain name nor a public mx record, > >> and even if I d

Weird Networking(?) problem....

I've run into what I find to be a weird problem which may be network stack related...or something else. Running a fully updated F16/KDE system and the latest flash plugin installed. I watch MLBtv which uses flash but seems to do only streaming as it doesn't produce any temp files that I can see.

wireless networking problem

I'm at my wits end trying to solve what I keep thinking is a simple problem. My old DSL modem doesn't have a wireless interface. It's connected to a router (the LAN gateway) which then has ethernet connections to my boxes. All of these computers use static IP addresses. The DSL modem is assigned a

Re: Weird Networking(?) problem....

On 06/13/2012 01:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > I've run into what I find to be a weird problem which may be network stack > related...or something else. > > Running a fully updated F16/KDE system and the latest flash plugin installed. > > I watch MLBtv which uses flash but seems to do only streaming

Re: Weird Networking(?) problem....

On 06/13/2012 08:21 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > There could be invisible files in /tmp directory. > Check if the available disk space gets lower and lower while streaming; > writing on an almost full disk can become slow. Nope, it is pure streaming as there is no change in disk usage while streami

fc20 wireless networking problem

Upgraded from fc18 to fc20 using fedup. Most went well. I had to restart the process because of a transient disk issue (Drive went to sleep). After that all was done and I rebooted. It booted into the fedup kernel to finish and complete the update. After that I rebooted into the fc20 kernel. Foun

Re: wireless networking problem

On 08/09/2010 06:28 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote: > I'm at my wits end trying to solve what I keep thinking is a simple > problem. > > My old DSL modem doesn't have a wireless interface. It's connected to a > router (the LAN gateway) which then has ethernet connections to my > boxes. All of these comp

Re: wireless networking problem

On 08/09/2010 04:28 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote: > I'm at my wits end trying to solve what I keep thinking is a simple > problem. > > My old DSL modem doesn't have a wireless interface. It's connected to a > router (the LAN gateway) which then has ethernet connections to my > boxes. All of these com

Re: wireless networking problem

On 08/10/2010 07:28 AM, Gerhard Magnus wrote: > The wireless router has an Internet --> WAN page in its setup that > includes a choice of Internet Connection Types: (1) Dynamic IP (DHCP), > which I can't use since the DSL modem has already taken the one IP > address assigned by my ISP; > (2) Stati

Re: wireless networking problem

In this case, you don't *have* to use the WAN/Internet port on the DIR-615 at all. In the D-Link's web menu, SETUP on the top, NETWORK SETTINGS on the left, the ROUTER SETTINGS section in the middle... Set the Router IP Address to an unused IP in the same network of your LAN. Check the Enable DNS

wireless networking problem (fixed)

Gerhard Magnus wrote: My old DSL modem doesn't have a wireless interface. It's connected to a router (the LAN gateway) which then has ethernet connections to my boxes. All of these computers use static IP addresses. The DSL modem is assigned a dynamic IP address by my ISP. I recently added a DIR

RE: fc20 wireless networking problem

Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:28:58 +0800 From: ed.gres...@greshko.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: fc20 wireless networking problem On 03/18/14 11:13, Luke Nath wrote: Upgraded from fc18 to fc20 using fedup. Most went

Re: fc20 wireless networking problem

On 03/19/14 07:05, Luke Nath wrote: > Strange ... > > I booted a fedora CD into rescue mode, opened a shell and ran fsck on /sdb2 > (the root partition of fedora, as sda1 is windows). > It cleaned up lot's of unclaimed blocks. > > I rebooted fc20 into multiuser mode and lo and behold, wireless lan

Re: fc20 wireless networking problem

On 03/18/14 11:13, Luke Nath wrote: > Upgraded from fc18 to fc20 using fedup. > > Most went well. I had to restart the process because of a transient > disk issue (Drive went to sleep). > After that all was done and I rebooted. It booted into the fedup kernel > to finish and complete the update. >

Re: wireless networking problem (fixed)

On Sunday, 05 September, 2010 @20:16 zulu, Gerhard Magnus scribed: > Here are the details of what worked (possibly of use to someone beside > me with basic networking issues): The reason I suggested using a LAN port on the D-Link, instead of its WAN port, was in case you wanted the wired and wire