This is a new install F-16/64 recently updated. Xsane is unable to
detect the HP Scanjet 5370c scanner. Reports "no devices available."
It appears to be detected as a USB device:
[bobg@box6 ~]$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus
I just discovered that I can not use my flat bed scanner, xsane protests
"no devices available."
lsusb shows:
Bus 005 Device 007: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
I believe this has worked since installing F-23 beta originally...
The last dnf upgrade was done this morning.
I have n
On 02/17/2012 03:28 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
This is a new install F-16/64 recently updated. Xsane is unable to
detect the HP Scanjet 5370c scanner. Reports "no devices available."
It appears to be detected as a USB device:
[bobg@box6 ~]$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:28:27PM -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> This is a new install F-16/64 recently updated. Xsane is unable to
> detect the HP Scanjet 5370c scanner. Reports "no devices available."
>
> It appears to be detected as a USB device:
>
> [bobg@box6 ~]$ lsusb
>
On 17/02/12 18:55, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 02/17/2012 03:28 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
This is a new install F-16/64 recently updated. Xsane is unable to
detect the HP Scanjet 5370c scanner. Reports "no devices available."
It appears to be detected as a USB device:
[bobg@box6 ~]
On Feb 17, 2012 4:28 PM, "Bob Goodwin" wrote:
>
> This is a new install F-16/64 recently updated. Xsane is unable to
> detect the HP Scanjet 5370c scanner. Reports "no devices available."
>
> It appears to be detected as a USB device:
>
> [bobg@box6 ~]$ lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 001
On 2/17/2012 7:18 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Try installing the 'hplip' and 'hplip-gui' packages, then run the
`hp-setup` utility.
I recently set up an HP combination scanner/printer, and while CUPS
picked up the printer the second I plugged it in, the scanner needed
that to work.
HTH
On 2/17/2012 7:48 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/17/2012 7:18 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Try installing the 'hplip' and 'hplip-gui' packages, then run the
`hp-setup` utility.
I recently set up an HP combination scanner/printer, and while CUPS
picked up the printer the second I plugge
On 17/02/12 22:18, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012 4:28 PM, "Bob Goodwin" wrote:
>
> This is a new install F-16/64 recently updated. Xsane is unable to
> detect the HP Scanjet 5370c scanner. Reports "no devices available."
>
> It appears to be detected as a USB device:
>
>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 09:36:00AM -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 17/02/12 22:18, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> >
> >On Feb 17, 2012 4:28 PM, "Bob Goodwin" wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a new install F-16/64 recently updated. Xsane is unable to
> >> detect the HP Scanjet 5370c scanner. Reports "no de
On 18/02/12 12:24, fred smith wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 09:36:00AM -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 17/02/12 22:18, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Try installing the 'hplip' and 'hplip-gui' packages, then run the
`hp-setup` utility.
I recently set up an HP combination scanner/printer, and while C
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:48:08PM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> On 2/17/2012 7:18 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> >
> >
> > Try installing the 'hplip' and 'hplip-gui' packages, then run the
> > `hp-setup` utility.
> >
> > I recently set up an HP combination scanner/printer, and while CUPS
>
On 2/18/2012 6:43 PM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:48:08PM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/17/2012 7:18 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Try installing the 'hplip' and 'hplip-gui' packages, then run the
`hp-setup` utility.
I recently set up an HP combination scanner/pr
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 06:51:14PM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> On 2/18/2012 6:43 PM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:48:08PM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> >> On 2/17/2012 7:18 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Try installing the 'hplip' and 'hplip-gui' packa
On 2/18/2012 7:22 PM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, this may or may not help, but I think this site is really good as far
as setting up a USB scanner with xsane. It is a Gentoo site, but I think
most of it is applicable to Fedora as well. I can't help but think this
problem is solvable with some
On 2/18/2012 7:53 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/18/2012 7:22 PM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, this may or may not help, but I think this site is really good
as far
as setting up a USB scanner with xsane. It is a Gentoo site, but I think
most of it is applicable to Fedora as well. I can't
On 24.11.2015 21:41, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I just discovered that I can not use my flat bed scanner, xsane protests
"no devices available."
lsusb shows:
Bus 005 Device 007: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
I believe this has worked since installing F-23 beta originally...
The last dnf
On 11/25/15 00:20, Joachim Backes wrote:
Bob,
did you try to access the scanner as root user? In earlier times, I
had sometimes similar problems, and accessing the scanner as root user
was a workaround.
I'm running a fully updated F23 too, and my USB scanner Canon-Lide30
still operates fla
On 2015-11-25 at 03:24:11 Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 11/25/15 00:20, Joachim Backes wrote:
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > did you try to access the scanner as root user? In earlier times, I
> > had sometimes similar problems, and accessing the scanner as root
> > user was a workaround.
> >
> > I'm running a f
On 11/25/15 05:01, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
Bob, check Vuescan from hamrick.com
(http://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/canon_n1240u.html). It's the only
proprietary software I use, but you don't have to pay in order to test
you device. At least you can see if the scanner is broken.
-- Erik
'
Proprietary
Hi,
I can't say if this helps but I've a similar problem with my usb
scanner on Fedora 20.
Unplug and re-plug the scanner and then restart xsane (maybe repeated
several times) solves the problem in my case.
Walter
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I just discovered that I can not use my
On 11/25/15 09:27, Walter Cazzola wrote:
Hi,
I can't say if this helps but I've a similar problem with my usb
scanner on Fedora 20.
Unplug and re-plug the scanner and then restart xsane (maybe repeated
several times) solves the problem in my case.
Walter
.
I've plugged it in numerous times,
On 11/25/15 09:57, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have inquired on the Sane list, if it's a known problem I should get
an answer there.
.
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://
On 11/25/2015 09:23 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 09:57, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have inquired on the Sane list, if it's a known problem I should get
an answer there.
.
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
D
On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
Does "sane-find-scanner" detect the right USB IDs for it? (run as
both you and as root and see "man sane-usb").
Probably a new package with f23
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Bob Goodwin
wrote:
> On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
>>> scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
>>>
>>
>> Does "sane-find-scanner" detect
On 11/25/2015 10:45 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
Does "sane-find-scanner" detect the right USB IDs for it? (run as
both you and as root and s
On 11/25/2015 10:46 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
Probably a new package with f23
Nope. It's there in F22:
[root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
Dunno why
On 11/25/15 13:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
Nope. It's there in F22:
[root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
Dunno why it didn't get installed on Bob's system by the upd
On 11/25/2015 12:11 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 13:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
Nope. It's there in F22:
[root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
Dunno why it did
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:11:32 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 11/25/15 13:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > Nope. It's there in F22:
> >
> > [root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
> > sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
> > sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-
On 11/28/15 05:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -e --test sane-backends-drivers-scanners
$
The simplest way of checking whether there are dependencies on a package.
Yes, F23 GNOME Workstation comes with this package pre-installed (just not
as a dependency). It used to be a bug in at least one o
Allegedly, on or about 28 November 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> [bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -e --test gkrellm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> gkrellm >= 2.2.0 is needed by (installed)
> gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-18.fc23.x86_64
>
> I guess the --test stops it from actually erasing anything?
That's the idea.
On 2/18/2012 11:33 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/18/2012 7:53 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/18/2012 7:22 PM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/HOWTO_Installing_USB_Scanner#Scanner_detection
Terry
Terry:
Thanks for the link. I will check it out.
[...]
I
On 02/19/2012 06:27 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
That being said, I am 100% functional for printing and, given that I
only scan about 20 items a year, using the F14 or XP box is quite
acceptable. Not certain if my continued effort is actually going to gain
me anything except personal satisfactio
On 2/19/2012 7:28 PM, Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
Hi,
the rpms installed on my system are:
hpijs-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-common-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-gui-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-libs-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
libsane-hpaio-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
I have a Hp c7
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 08:30:28PM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Gabriel:
>
> You provided the necessary piece of info that I overlooked (as we would
> say in the States .. "Bingo!").
>
> I had all the rpms, but what happened was I got fooled by the
> "system-config-print cups hpijs" setup
On 02/19/2012 10:30 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/19/2012 7:28 PM, Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
Hi,
the rpms installed on my system are:
hpijs-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-common-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-gui-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
hplip-libs-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64
l
On 2/20/2012 12:19 AM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, glad you figgered it out. I had a feeling it was something of this
type. Like I say, 'the computer is always right, or garbage in...' ;)
Terry
===
[gabriel's reply:]
Hi,
Well I was in your situation some time ago, and wasnt obvious to me t
On 2/20/2012 8:57 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
.
I'm still happy, don't get me wrong ... its now just the little "oh,
wouldn't it be nice" sort of things and wanting to make sure the
running just hp-setup doesn't miss something (like the lp* functions).
Paul
For what it is worth ...
I'm
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 21:01 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I'm going through
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_printing_problems and not
> seeing anything since I am getting stuff printed and the doc seems to be
> directed at stuff not getting printed
If you can see an improvement
Paul Allen Newell:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_printing_problems
Tim Waugh:
> If you can see an improvement to be made to that page, please go ahead.
Unrelated to the original poster, but I can think of a small one. At
the end of the page there is this:
- begin p
On 2/21/2012 2:29 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 21:01 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I'm going through
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_printing_problems and not
seeing anything since I am getting stuff printed and the doc seems to be
directed at stuff not getting printed
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> And, given that I
> currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora
> repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I
> get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the suggestions in the document is t
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:09 +1030, Tim wrote:
> You could have a sample file for them to try out, or suggest a specific
> file that they'd already have on their system. Some people have a
> strange idea about what constitutes a *small* file. ;-) (It's only
> 50MB, I deal with bigger files than t
On 2/23/2012 5:03 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
And, given that I
currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora
repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I
get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the s
On 2/23/2012 5:03 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
And, given that I
currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora
repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I
get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the s
47 matches
Mail list logo
