Hello,
I am working on a dedicated Opensips 1.6 instance to act as a topology hiding
B2BUA. I had a question about the To field: Will the B2BUA update this to
reflect the same values as the RURI with the included tophiding scenario? If
not, is it possible to call uac_replace_to before the b2
Hi,
is anyone has a config example of use mediaproxy with
freeswitch as load balancing failover ?
Best regards
Franck___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
On 10 Feb 2010, at 12:43, a...@pmnt.net wrote:
> Dan
>
> As per iptables this module is present.
>
> But error present regulary
Check if you have the iptable_raw and iptable_nat modules loaded
>
> Feb 10 08:58:03 sip media-relay[20476]: Traceback (most recent call
> last):
> Feb 10 08:58:03 s
what is responsible for using the external ip for the record route?
Right now cancels are not being routed properly.
It seems from the SIP trace that we are using the natted ip rather than
the public.
However the box does not have a public ip, we are port forwarding from
our router to our opens
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 14:49:51 Madovsky wrote:
> I saw a patch for RTPproxy that transcode, I think it's included in the
> last version.
RTPProxy it's not able to transcode, what you had seen it's a patch that allow
to use DSP cards with RTPProxy, so it will be able to transcode, but that
- I start opensips mediaproxy
Feb 10 09:53:39 node250 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[24191]: INFO:core:sig_usr:
signal 15 received
Feb 10 09:53:39 node250 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[24188]: INFO:core:sig_usr:
signal 15 received
Feb 10 09:53:39 node250 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[24181]:
Hi Frank,
You could use OpenSIPS with Asterisk for transcoding. Using the failure
route capabilities of OpenSIPS, you can track responses such as "415
Unsupported Media Type" and forward to an Asterisk server only the
conversations that requires transcoding. Depending on the size of your
installa
- Original Message -
From: "Iñaki Baz Castillo"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Article on mediaproxy
El Miércoles, 10 de Febrero de 2010, Madovsky escribió:
> I need to proxy these softphones with nat_traversal (and not) and
> transcode th
- Original Message -
From: "Iñaki Baz Castillo"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Article on mediaproxy
El Miércoles, 10 de Febrero de 2010, Madovsky escribió:
> I need to proxy these softphones with nat_traversal (and not) and
> transcode th
El Miércoles, 10 de Febrero de 2010, Madovsky escribió:
> I need to proxy these softphones with nat_traversal (and not) and
> transcode the signal when needed in Gxxx and Speex.
So MediaProxy is not valid for you, neither RtpProxy. Take into account that
both MediaProxy and RtpProxy are UDP prox
El Miércoles, 10 de Febrero de 2010, Madovsky escribió:
> > I'd really like to see some SIP traces and syslog outputs on this, so if
> > there is something broken I can fix it. If your traces contain sensible
> > data feel free to email them to me privately.
>
> any CL to trace SIP ? syslog doesn
Hi Saul,
> Hi,
>
>
>> For now Opensips/MediaProxy doesn't work well for me (fedora10, kernel
>> 2.6.32.7, all netfilters modules compiled).
>> the installation suceed, openSIPS/media-dispatcher media-relay start
>> well,
>> no error, unless that 1 time on 5 it's unstable,
>> 2 softphone (x-lite o
Hi,
> Hi,
>
>> Ok Adrian, but why there are so lack of documentation of MediaProxy ?
>> no one answered me on this emails if it has really or not transcoder
>> capabilities,
>
> MediaProxy does not have transcoding capabilities, it just relays media.
OK
>> I tried to make it work since 3 days no
Hi,
> For now Opensips/MediaProxy doesn't work well for me (fedora10, kernel
> 2.6.32.7, all netfilters modules compiled).
> the installation suceed, openSIPS/media-dispatcher media-relay start well,
> no error, unless that 1 time on 5 it's unstable,
> 2 softphone (x-lite or linphone), the reach
Hi,
> Ok Adrian, but why there are so lack of documentation of MediaProxy ?
> no one answered me on this emails if it has really or not transcoder
> capabilities,
MediaProxy does not have transcoding capabilities, it just relays media.
> I tried to make it work since 3 days now, and sometimes it
Hi Wesley,
The number of parameters is not correct, See:
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/permissions.html#id271903
Regards,
Bogdan
Wesley Volcov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've got the follow problem. I'm using opensips 1.6.1-notls version.
>
> First, see my script conf:
>
> lo
Hello all,
I've got the follow problem. I'm using opensips 1.6.1-notls version.
First, see my script conf:
loadmodule "permissions.so"
modparam("permissions","db_url", "mysql://opensips:opensip...@localhost
/opensips")
if (check_address()) {
if (!proxy_authorize("","sub
- Original Message -
From: "Saúl Ibarra Corretgé"
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list"
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Article on mediaproxy
> Hi,
>
> El 10/02/10 5:57, Infos Madovsky escribió:
>> Hi,
>> is any MediaProxy dev can comment this art
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Georgescu"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:27 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Article on mediaproxy
> That article refers to the previous version of MediaProxy (version 1),
> which was doing about 200 calls per CPU by relaying packets in th
El Martes, 9 de Febrero de 2010, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
> I could imagine accepting such header just for CANCEL coming from a known
> source (i.e. my application server or PBX).
>
> Just as suggestion, perhaps a flag in t_relay() would be used for this, a
> flag that only makes sense for
Hello Anca,
An ven., févr 05, 2010, Anca Vamanu schrieb:
>On the other hand, I suggest for you to start playing with the
>simple topology hiding scenario and the go to more complicated
>scripts.
>
...but the topology hiding scenario has no associated XML file
which makes learning more difficult.
El Miércoles, 10 de Febrero de 2010, Adrian Georgescu escribió:
> Hm, not when you click on the web archive and compose a message, it does
> not.
Any problem to reply directly from the mail client by pressing "Reply" (or
"Reply to the list" / "Reply to all") over the mail to reply? :)
That's the
Dan
As per iptables this module is present.
But error present regulary
Feb 10 08:58:03 sip media-relay[20476]: Traceback (most recent call last):
Feb 10 08:58:03 sip media-relay[20476]: File
"/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/internet/udp.py", line 126, in doRead
Feb 10 08:58:03 sip m
Hello Anca,
I'm approaching the problem from a different perspective now,
and making progress with your help. Please note the 'CSEQ'...
Caller OpenSIPS B2B Mediaserver
| | |
INVITE CSEQ 1 ->| INVITE CSEQ 2 -
That article refers to the previous version of MediaProxy (version 1),
which was doing about 200 calls per CPU by relaying packets in the
user space.
The current version of MediaProxy (version 2) scales several orders of
magnitude higher because the relaying is done directly by the Linux
k
Hello Bogdan,
I should tell you that I've recompiled OpenSIPS since the crash.
The changes are unrelated to the core or uac module so there's no
problem, however it might be that the core you've asked to study
reports memory locations that don't match the new running OpenSIPS.
Also, I've changed
Hi,
The discussion three years ago was about a few hundred simultaneous calls.
Now is about a few thousand simultaneous calls. MediaProxy version 2 is
different from the version 1, so the article is in my opinion, outdated.
Anyway, OpenSIPS is a signaling proxy, the idea is not to bridge all t
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:51, a...@pmnt.net wrote:
> Thanks for answer
>
> I find next modules for my Debian Linux kernel
>
> ipt_MASQUERADE
> nf_nat_sip
> nf_conntrack_sip
> iptable_nat
> nf_nat
> nf_conntrack_ipv4
> nf_conntrack
>
> Pls could you tell me what modules from the sheet must present in
It's allready fixed, had some irc help.. it was a problem with the domain
url!
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:51 AM, AsteriskGuide wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>
>
> The ERROR is supposed to be before these messages use –n 200 and check
> above. If you can’t find any message describing why y
Hm, not when you click on the web archive and compose a message, it
does not.
Adrian
El Martes, 9 de Febrero de 2010, Adrian Georgescu escribió:
> See CDRTool interfaces for media sessions, media usage statistics and
> media trace if it serves your purpose.
>
> Adrian
Hi Adrian, doesn't Apple
Hi Peter,
The ERROR is supposed to be before these messages use -n 200 and check
above. If you can't find any message describing why your proxy is being
shutdown, increase the level of log messages.
Regards,
Flavio E. Goncalves
De: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-b
Thanks for answer
I find next modules for my Debian Linux kernel
ipt_MASQUERADE
nf_nat_sip
nf_conntrack_sip
iptable_nat
nf_nat
nf_conntrack_ipv4
nf_conntrack
Pls could you tell me what modules from the sheet must present in
kernel?
Best wishes, Ant.
__
El Miércoles, 10 de Febrero de 2010, Infos Madovsky escribió:
> Hi,
>
> is any MediaProxy dev can comment this article please ?
>
> http://hans.fugal.net/blog/2007/03/06/adios-mediaproxy/
"Asterisk scales better in the real world, I have to recommend Asterisk as
your media “proxy”."
=> segmen
El Miércoles, 10 de Febrero de 2010, Chris Maciejewski escribió:
> > What is "online"? if you mean the "open"
> > then I inform you that the meaning of this field is not well defined by
> > RFC's (nothing in SIMPLE related RFC's is well defined so specifications
> > in top of them, as OMA's ones,
Hello,
Last week i did a fresh installation of opensips on a new virtual machine
and copied my old config file (that works perfectly on alot of other
servers) and changed the IP's to the new servers, but while starting i see
the following message:
ipco-opensips:/etc/opensips# tail -f /var/log/sys
Hi,
El 10/02/10 5:57, Infos Madovsky escribió:
> Hi,
> is any MediaProxy dev can comment this article please ?
> http://hans.fugal.net/blog/2007/03/06/adios-mediaproxy/
> Regards
> Franck
>
I won't comment on the rightness of the article, the best you can do is
test it by yourself and select the
36 matches
Mail list logo
