Well, I could try.
/Anders
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:10, Stephanie Johnson jstephani...@gmail.comwrote:
Explanation and suggestion in the link was not clear and I couldnt find it
again. Hence came to Maven Users list for any suggestions. Could you please
continue to take a look?
On Fri,
Hello,
Yes, it is. I've found that putting the real path in the pom.xml
works fine, but I can't use a variable as the path. The problem I
have with putting it in the pom makes the pom very specific rather
then the settings.xml.
I'm open for other suggestions on how to accomplish the
i dont believe regularexpression parsing is currently available but you can
modify org.apache.maven.profiles.Activation.java
package org.apache.maven.profiles;
@SuppressWarnings( all )
public class Activation
implements java.io.Serializable
{
/* The conditions within the build runtime
Hello,
I'd rather not have to modify Maven for this. I'm also not looking
for regular expressions, but rather just interpolation of the
variables defined by other profiles. I guess the problem is the order
in which the profiles are defined?
Is there a way to set a variable without using
James Russo wrote:
Hello,
Yes, it is. I've found that putting the real path in the pom.xml
works fine, but I can't use a variable as the path. The problem I
have with putting it in the pom makes the pom very specific rather
then the settings.xml.
I'm open for other suggestions on how
Activate the nsis profile in your settings.xml and use the same
profile id
(without an activation element) in your POM.
Perfect. I'm going to go this route.
-jr
The java.net repo is unfortunately a hodge podge of things and
too-frequently subject to downtime and other odd behavior. So is it
expected? No. Am I surprised? also no.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Roger Pack rogerdpa...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the java.net maven2 repo
contains
FWIW, Maven, Nexus and probably Archiva also do the same if you enable
strict checksum checking. It can be debated which default is less
disruptive but ultimately the choice is up to the user to set it the
way they prefer.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Yoav Landman yland...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a big assumption, as most of the machines will have their times
differing by some amount.
( Maybe it is a good enough assumption as artifacts need not be compared
with a millisecond accuracy )
Exactly. And the times are converted to GMT so assuming the machines
are configured properly
The quickest way to get this fixed is to file a jira, with a test
project and mark it as affects Maven 3.x-alpha-3
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Luca Marrocco luca.marro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i've tried maven3. it works very well and is faster than previous
version :) great works!
i've
Hi there,
I have the following configuration for the maven-compiler-plugin
plugin
artifactIdmaven-compiler-
plugin/artifactId
executions
execution
iddefault-compile/id
I could be wrong, but I don't think 2.0.x has named default executions.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Thiago Moreira (timba)
tmoreira2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have the following configuration for the maven-compiler-plugin
plugin
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
I could be wrong, but I don't think 2.0.x has named default executions.
Correct.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For
13 matches
Mail list logo
