On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
> > Hmm. I understand what ClassLoader.getResources(path) returns (just read
> > the javadoc). However, if I have a bunch of independently developed
> > components that are assembled as WAR overlays,
On 16 April 2013 17:57, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 4/16/2013 9:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> On 16 April 2013 17:25, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>
>> Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 April 2013 16:19, Ma
On 4/16/2013 9:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 17:25, Mark Eggers wrote:
Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
wha
It can be as simple as a jar artifact that has one file:
META-INF/plexus/components.xml
For an example of the content of such a components.xml
https://github.com/jszip/jszip-maven-plugin/blob/master/src/main/resources/META-INF/plexus/components.xml
(yes that is in a plugin, but the packaging co
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> perhaps even defining a new packaging type so that I can
> just go eggers-war
>
I have a similar requirement and never thought about the packaging type;
what a great idea! Where is the documentation that
On 16 April 2013 17:25, Mark Eggers wrote:
> Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
>
>
> On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>
>> On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
>>>
>>> what needs concatenating? there is
Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular
these
days.
Some properties
+1
Very well put!
On 16/04/2013 11:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular
these
days.
Some properties files. I could possibly remove the pro
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
>
>> what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular
>> these
>> days.
>>
>
> Some properties files. I could possibly remove the properties files issue
> by either having the developers
http://developer-blog.cloudbees.com/2013/04/the-maven-way.html
On 16 April 2013 16:16, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16 April 2013 16:11, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:48:35PM +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> [snip]
>> > The reality is that the true goal of the Maven
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular these
days.
Some properties files. I could possibly remove the properties files
issue by either having the developers hand craft them for each project,
or design a new modular con
On 16 April 2013 16:11, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:48:35PM +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> [snip]
> > The reality is that the true goal of the Maven Way™ is that your pom
> should
> > be as close as possible to the following
> >
> >
> > ...
> > ...
> > ...
> > ...
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:48:35PM +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote:
[snip]
> The reality is that the true goal of the Maven Way™ is that your pom should
> be as close as possible to the following
>
>
> ...
> ...
> ...
> ...
>
> ...
>
>
>
> Every line you add to the above is movi
Hi Mirko,
Thank you for your answers.
What do you mean by check out to: c:/tmp/myprj ??
Do I use below switch for that?
mvn -B -Dresume=false -DworkingDirectory=/tmp/myprj release:prepare
release:perform
BTW: regarding naming the workspace
We
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular these
days.
On Apr 16, 2013 6:56 PM, "Mark Eggers" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to Maven, and I'm trying to meet the following requirements.
>
> 1. A web site consisting of multiple components, some optional
> 2. Optional co
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013, Mark Eggers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to Maven, and I'm trying to meet the following requirements.
>
> 1. A web site consisting of multiple components, some optional
> 2. Optional components each have some configuration files
> 3. If multiple optional components ar
16 matches
Mail list logo
