-Message d'origine-
De : Bruno Borges [mailto:bruno.bor...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : 4 février 2016 15:03
Looking at docs for 3.3.9 [1], I noticed the following:
proxies/proxy* List *(Many)* Configuration for different proxy profiles.
Multiple proxy profiles might come in handy for anyone wor
Looking at docs for 3.3.9 [1], I noticed the following:
proxies/proxy* List *(Many)* Configuration for different proxy
profiles. Multiple proxy profiles might come in handy for anyone working
from a notebook or other mobile platform, to enable easy switching of
entire proxy configurations by simp
Hello,
Yes you have to provide interfaces for Java 8 compiler which you did not need
before. If your dependencies do not provide these artifacts you get the
compiler error. You then basically have the option to include it in the
upstream dependency or in your own project as a compile time deoe
i agree with curtis
>javac -versionjavac 1.8.0_40
4.0.0testTest1.0
org.jboss.jbossts
jbossjts-integration 4.16.6
org.jboss.jbosstsjbossjts
4.16.6.Final
javax.transaction
jta1.1
Hi Shaddy,
> Is it as significant a change in behaviour as I think it, for pom.xml
> authors to update their definitions to no longer specify that
> interfaces are "provided"?
Personally, I have never heard of interface/API JARs being scoped as
provided in this manner, until you pointed out the j