Thanks, I keep forgetting about its custom nature. I've asked before, but
do you think its possible for Maven to validate the configuration elements
like Intellij does?
> I have *war that I've built on 3 different Macs (maven-war-plugin 3.3.2).
>
Is there a reason you're rebuilding your WAR three times on different Macs?
> The code is pulled from my local git repo, and the supporting jars are from
> a local Nexus repository.
Are they all building from the sam
Have you tried diffing the effective-pom on the various machines?
How about running with debug logs? Does the waven-war-plugin maybe outputs
why it picks or excludes dependencies from the war?
Le ven. 14 avr. 2023 à 21:34, Thad Humphries a
écrit :
> I have *war that I've built on 3 different Mac
I have *war that I've built on 3 different Macs (maven-war-plugin 3.3.2).
The code is pulled from my local git repo, and the supporting jars are from
a local Nexus repository. All Macs use the same setup--Amazon Corretto Java
11 and Maven 3.9.1. The ~/.m2/settings.xml are identical. Two of the Macs
Hi,
doesn't look odd the moment you know plugin authors can name configuration
elements anything they want. They could call it , but that doesn't
make it an UFO.
That said, spotbugs seems to use the findbugs artifact as a dependency in a
plugin like manner. They just choose to call it that way.
Hi. Two things look odd here
com.github.spotbugs
spotbugs-maven-plugin
4.7.3.4
com.h3xstream.findsecbugs
findsecbugs-plugin
1.12.0
W
