containing jessie's JAR if you don't wnat to build the artifact from
source.
cheers,
dalibor topic
Quoting Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:21:47PM -0500, Jeff Jensen wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a JSSE implentaton hosted in a public Maven repo. I have
Classpath projects for examples.
On a side note, any idea whether JSR 277 will be developped in an open
fashion, with an open source RI, like the concurrency JSR was?
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
redistributed under nicer conditions. They
have all failed, afaict by the licenses of most of Java technology not
having changed much in the last five years.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] Not wanting to single them out, other $BIGCORPS with proprietary
software windmills have also had their share of folks
C downloading the jars from you gets
into a lawsuit with the $BIGCORP that owns the proprietary jars, and
during the discovery process, it turns out that C is using $BIGCORPS's
proprietary technology without license. Such a thing never looks good
in court.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:32:14AM -0700, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 04:10 -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
On a side note, any idea whether JSR 277 will be developped in an open
fashion, with an open source RI, like the concurrency JSR was?
That's up to the spec lead (Stanley
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:16:09PM +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
On 10/20/05, Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:25:31PM +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
You will not believe it, but this is also required for standard dtds
and xsds (like the web.xml schema
in court. Who should $BIGCORP sue then
for damages if it turns out it can't enforce its license against some
hypothetical 'evil-doers'? Should $BIGCORP sue the script developers?[1]
:)
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] A lot of this has already played out in the p2p field anyway, where
corporations have sued end
their potential for excercising their restrictions
is unclear wrt to your use of their non-free work.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] Non-free licenses in general resemble contracts, and contracts
require some form of acceptance to occur in order to be formed between
two parties. In addition, without
) geronimo 1.0M4 on
kaffe's cvs head, and all that kaffe internally does is to set
build.compiler friends for jikes, which works fine for me.
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
comments on
everything posted in his absence :)
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernels which are loading plugins.
And AIIK the compilation to native code can't help much in such cases.
Not being a gcj developer myself, I unfortunately don't know how well it
copes with that sort of issues. You may want to ask on the gcj developer
mailing lists.
cheers,
dalibor topic
will accept my public apologies, I certainly didn't mean to harm.
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are that you'll end up with a hosed combination that
doesn't run eventually.
BTW, thanks a lot for keeping the discussion focused on the technical
aspects.
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
and distribution. There is nothing kaffe-specific in that idea, it's not
even mine ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jason,
thanks a lot for the quick and insightful reply!
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 16:02, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I honestly don't get that riled up about it. I fight the fights I can
but I'm not going to spend my life battling Sun. I fight them by
choosing not to use their APIs
, and all that. As Jason said, he doesn't want
to care about platform specific aspects. That's fine. Other people do,
though, in order to deliver audited, tested and integrated applications
on those platforms. I'd like to figure out a way to make their job
easier. That's all.
cheers,
dalibor
Hi Jason,
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 10:39, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi Jason,
thanks a lot for taking the time to reply so quickly.
Compliancy to JDK APIs is a seal of approval given out by Sun for
passing the TCK. Since the TCK is not available under a free software or
open
management field? OH, Hell yes.
When 99% of the field has no dependency management at all (i.e.
Windows), that's hardly that surprising, isn't it ? ;)
I'd be interested in what Maven can offer that a native package manager
(say dpkg) can not.
cheers,
dalibor topic
on, and these tend to be
mutually incompatible. Where does that come into play? You wouldn't want
arm-linux binary C libraries attempting to use i386-linux SWT libraries ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
++ .so compiled with g++ 2.95 to a
C++ .so file compiled with g++ 3.2, you will have massive problems.
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jason,
thanks a lot for taking the time to reply so quickly.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 21:52, Dalibor Topic wrote:
In my experience (with getting different programs to run on free
runtimes), things never work out of the box on all platforms, usually.
For example, Maven has
and free java runtime developers in order to
find better ways to package java applications on unix systems[1].
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] http://java.debian.net/index.php/CommonJavaPackaging
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
for that. Though, in my opinion, it could be an even
better thing if we could get Maven to leverage the existing package
management systems instead of just being a better Napster for JAR
files ;))
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] That I submitted a patch for to JIRA, btw, so if someone could
review
. There is a
ton of reasons why the packager of a dependency for an OS can make a
more suited component to depend on than the generic jar file downloaded
off ibiblio.org/maven. Security, OS-specific patches, configuration file
locations, handling of multiple runtimes, ...
cheers,
dalibor topic
24 matches
Mail list logo
