Hi Jason, hi Rafal,
you brought up some good points. I also think of Confluence as a very
good tool to collect information, from which projects can extract the
documentation. We've been using confluence in a internal project and
our documentation has improved, because it is so much easier to
Jason van Zyl wrote:
So I started yanking out confluence docs and converting them to apt:
http://www.xmlmind.com/aptconvert.html
After realizing the internal format of confluence is crap I just started
using apt itself which I think is a better format anyway (I was
convinced by Pete Kazmier) but I
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 03:30, Rafal Krzewski wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
PS. I'm tracking the m2 progress, and I'm really happy with what I'm
seeing! I wish I could take a part in that...
It is clipping along at a rapid pace, if you want to try and build with
it we can arrange something.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
It is clipping along at a rapid pace, if you want to try and build with
it we can arrange something. Before the alpha is released I'll probably
ask various folks to do some pre-alpha testing. There are about 14
plugins so far that are being used for testing, but the core will
Hello world,
I'm wondering how much of the Maven community uses Confluence as well. I
do and I certainly like that.
Some time ago someone Nick Minutello wrote in his blog (can't find the
link ATM, sorry) that he is working on a maven plugin that would
tranform xdocs into Confuence compatible
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 17:11, Rafal Krzewski wrote:
Hello world,
I'm wondering how much of the Maven community uses Confluence as well. I
do and I certainly like that.
All of the maven2 use cases and other docs like the criteria for the
first m2 alpha, repository upload applications,
Just a quick question: What's wrong with radeox and regex?
On , 2004-05-24 at 17:37 -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 17:11, Rafal Krzewski wrote:
Hello world,
I'm wondering how much of the Maven community uses Confluence as well. I
do and I certainly like that.
All
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 18:17, Nadeem Bitar wrote:
Just a quick question: What's wrong with radeox and regex?
Paragraph formatting was awful and apt just provided a real parser so
though I have to do a little more work it's resulted in something more
robust. I don't mind doing a little java
