Re: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-18 Thread John Casey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, One point of confusion which comes from our development approach up to recently is the release cycle for plugins vs. that of the core. Going forward, plugins will each have their own release cycle, which is not meshed (except roughly) with

Re: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-18 Thread Dion Gillard
On 10/19/05, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm not sure about the antRun plugin specifically...the work I've been doing lately is for lower-level support of Ant as a native mojo language, rather than for referencing Ant scripts in the

Re: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-18 Thread Brett Porter
I hadn't - thanks. I'm not sure this adds a great deal over using the Ant API itself though. However, what John is referring to is to making Ant a plugin language for Maven (so not Jelly or Marmalade, just plain ant scripts where a target can be used as a goal and the plugin configuration is fed

RE: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
Isn't that basically the same as using antrun? That's how we've been using it in the meantime to call jdo enhancers and testNg. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 12:42 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: [m2] new plugins

Re: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-18 Thread Chris Berry
Hi John, I guess what's problematic is that many of us have been working from the HEAD of SVN so that we could workaround this or that bug. So now that we have a release candidate (RC) -- it is only a portion of the picture (no plugins are provided). So do we stick with our current SNAPSHOT

Re: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-18 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Chris, The current releases (with the exception of a limited number of reporting plugins) work with the RC and have been tested via the integration tests. Likewise, you can build from SVN if you wish for one or all plugins, however we're highly recommending those not working on development of

Re: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-17 Thread Brett Porter
There are no specific plugins for the RC, we just missed an incompatibility between versions with resources and site. Upgrading to the RC fixes issues with the resources plugin, but breaks certain reports. These will be corrected shortly. - Brett On 10/17/05, Chris Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [m2] new plugins for m2 RC??

2005-10-17 Thread Chris Berry
Hi Brett, I'm confused. 1) I'm pretty certain that some plugins have changed -- specifically the antcall plugin. 2) When I build the HEAD from SVN (using the m2-bootstrap script) -- I get all new plugins built and installed in my local repo (stamped at the current SNAPSHOT). So when you build