If it at all helps, mine only fails a little over halfway though a
multimodule build (there are probably 12 modules total) with 2.0.9, but
makes it all the way with 2.0.8. Obviously that is very vague sine you know
nothing about my projects, but what I'm hoping maybe helps a little is that
it just
2008/5/18 Asgeir S. Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do you think this is related to MCOMPILER-64 in any way?
Perhaps - the comments do say 2.0.8 works?
I filed this issue to track: MNG-3584
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---
Do you think this is related to MCOMPILER-64 in any way?
We've started experiencing a number of PermGen errors in our build.
Most of the time setting PermSize to 128m helps, but not always.
Asgeir
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I'm not sure what
List
Subject: Re: Memory issues in 2.0.9
Ah ok. So by using 2.0.9 I will have different versions of plugins
downloaded into my plugins directory, but with 2.0.8 it will use a
different
set? I figured the behavior of which ones they use would be the same.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Brian E
--Brian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:48 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Memory issues in 2.0.9
>
> I think I can confirm this is a problem in 2.0.9. But first things
> first.
>
>
Brett,
I'm all setup with Yourkit lately, do you have a public sample project I
can profile?
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:48 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Memory issues in 2.0.9
I think I can confirm
ould get the same plugins as 2.0.9
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Wayne Fay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:08 AM
>> To: Maven Users List
>> Subject: Re: Memory issues in 2.0.9
>>
>> You sure the only differe
: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Memory issues in 2.0.9
>
> You sure the only difference is 2.0.8 vs 2.0.9? That would mean that
> you have all plugins locked down (and same JDK etc), and only the core
> is changing. Is this the case?
>
> Wayne
>
> On 5/15/08, Ryan Moquin <
No, I'm just sure that I changed my path statement and reran it to see what
would happen. It's possible the plugins updated and I didn't realize it. I
would hope that's the case. I'm not sure how to lock down the plugins.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
emory issues in 2.0.9
You sure the only difference is 2.0.8 vs 2.0.9? That would mean that
you have all plugins locked down (and same JDK etc), and only the core
is changing. Is this the case?
Wayne
On 5/15/08, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I'm not sure what all to sub
You sure the only difference is 2.0.8 vs 2.0.9? That would mean that
you have all plugins locked down (and same JDK etc), and only the core
is changing. Is this the case?
Wayne
On 5/15/08, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I'm not sure what all to submit informationwise about this i
11 matches
Mail list logo
