looks good to me... will apply when I get a chance.
Thanks,
Brett
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:09:56 -0600, Leif Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After 6 months... I wrote a small patch.. MPARTIFACT-22. I started with
> the latest HEAD version of the artifact plugin in CVS. This adds the
> "s
After 6 months... I wrote a small patch.. MPARTIFACT-22. I started with
the latest HEAD version of the artifact plugin in CVS. This adds the
"scpexe://" protocol to the artifact plugin. Provides eqivalent
funcionality to the old maven.ssh.executable and maven.scp.executable
properties.
He
> There is a special type of deployer in maven-artifact plugin called
> "External", which was supposed to be used for executing
> arbitrary user
> defined programs (like putty). This deployer is
> "half-finished". A new
> protocol sounds like a good idea. Leif: Patches and
> documentation a
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Leif,
(Sorry for CC'ing back to the list again, but they'll probably want to
review this)
Sounds like a good idea - perhaps a new protocol could be added to artifact
(scpexe:// ?) that uses the mentioned parameters. Alternatively, it might be
a branch of the existing protoc
Hi Leif,
(Sorry for CC'ing back to the list again, but they'll probably want to
review this)
Sounds like a good idea - perhaps a new protocol could be added to artifact
(scpexe:// ?) that uses the mentioned parameters. Alternatively, it might be
a branch of the existing protocl based on another p
Your analysis is correct.
Artifact needs to be more friendly to SSH, jar:deploy should use artifact.
The reason it hasn't moved is because of the fact that artifact still needs
more work.
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Leif Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday,