Please read the important note in the installation instructions. You
have MAVEN_HOME set to 1.1, but have 1.0.2 ahead of it in your PATH.
- Brett
On 7/10/05, Jing Xue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying the 1.1 beta with a minimal project and got this error while
just running 'maven'
Nicolas Chalumeau wrote on Friday, February 25, 2005 1:43 PM:
A corrupted jar !
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/sun/org/apache/xml/internal/serialize/OutputFormat
This is a strange package path (com.sun and org.apache)!
Unfortunately not. This is the next
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicolas Chalumeau wrote on Friday, February 25, 2005 1:43 PM:
A corrupted jar !
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/sun/org/apache/xml/internal/serialize/OutputFormat
This is a strange
I think i had the same kind of trouble with httpClient.
All I ended up with was to overwrite the httpClient jar in the
lib directory of maven. Dirty but working ;-)
Hope this helps,
--mike
Adam Hardy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicolas Chalumeau
]
Sent: 25 February 2005 14:58
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: xerces
I think i had the same kind of trouble with httpClient.
All I ended up with was to overwrite the httpClient jar in the lib directory of
maven. Dirty but working ;-)
Hope this helps,
--mike
Adam Hardy wrote:
-Original
How's it going? would xml parser setting be removed? answer plz
- Original Message -
From: Pak, Young-rok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Maven Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: xerces
I'm interested in why you
John Casey wrote:
One final thought: leaving the parser choice up to the user is the right
thing to do when you're developing an application component which will
run in some java context outside its own. However, this is an
unnecessary and even undesirable level of flexibility for a standalone
Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Maven Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: xerces
Yes, maven has an extdir that includes xerces-2.4.0 and xml-apis-1.0-b2.
You should try specifying 'maven.compile.fork=true' in your
project.properties to see whether
be able to choose their own parser without modifying maven script and classpath.
- Original Message -
From: John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Maven Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: xerces
Yes, maven has an extdir that includes xerces-2.4.0
The reason is simple - the crimson parser bundled with the JDK's through
1.4.2(?) is complete crap. Additionally, even older JDK's don't have a
parser bundled, which means you'd have to create multiple maven distros
(one for parser-bundled JDKs and another which accounted for the xml
I'm interested in why you need MS949 for project.xml. The reason I ask
is that we intend to switch to a smaller, faster XML parser in Maven
1.1, however it is likely to support fewer encodings and xml features
- but still supports everything required to correctly operate Maven
that we have found
I'm interested in why you need MS949 for project.xml. The reason I ask
is that we intend to switch to a smaller, faster XML parser in Maven
1.1, however it is likely to support fewer encodings and xml features
- but still supports everything required to correctly operate Maven
that we have
Yes, maven has an extdir that includes xerces-2.4.0 and xml-apis-1.0-b2.
You should try specifying 'maven.compile.fork=true' in your
project.properties to see whether this helps. It should cause the javac
execution to take place in a new process which is free of the maven
version of xerces et
Thanks for the trick. It's ok now.
Regards,
Stéphane
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:40 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: xerces
Yes, maven has an extdir that includes xerces-2.4.0 and xml-apis-1.0-b2.
You should try
Noone's requested it.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Chenoweth, Bruce (STP) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16/01/2004
05:11:01 AM:
Hello
Is there any particular reason the ibiblio archives have not been
updated to
include later
15 matches
Mail list logo