Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-22 Thread Benson Margulies
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > does it upload the pom with its version fully translated? All it does is arrange to trigger the 'version with a property' functionality that was added quite some time ago. If that functionality uploaded resolved poms, it uploads resolved poms. I

Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-21 Thread Dan Tran
does it upload the pom with its version fully translated? Thanks -D On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > > Hi Benson > > > > Sounds promissing > > > > does it support jenkins env BUILD_NUM? > > I doubt it. I dislike Jenk

Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-21 Thread Benson Margulies
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > Hi Benson > > Sounds promissing > > does it support jenkins env BUILD_NUM? I doubt it. I dislike Jenkins and avoid having anything to do with it. Feel free to make a PR. > does it push the actual version to maven repo at install/deploy time? if

Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-21 Thread Dan Tran
Hi Benson Sounds promissing does it support jenkins env BUILD_NUM? does it push the actual version to maven repo at install/deploy time? Thanks -Dan On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > https://github.com/basis-technology-corp/auto-version-maven-extension > > On Sat, Ap

Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-21 Thread Benson Margulies
https://github.com/basis-technology-corp/auto-version-maven-extension On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Jeff Jensen wrote: >> >> Jason van Zyl also mentioned he was working on CD solution for Maven last >> year, not sure what the progress on this front. > > > Yes, I've been curious about the progr

Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-16 Thread Jeff Jensen
> > Jason van Zyl also mentioned he was working on CD solution for Maven last > year, not sure what the progress on this front. Yes, I've been curious about the progress too. It's very needed and so promising. On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > Thanks Stephen. > > I was excit

Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-16 Thread Dan Tran
Thanks Stephen. I was excited for a short moment but hitting the reality where I may have to deal with hundreds of dev and qa over the confusion of the hidden version. Especially, when they have to rebuild a subset of the product. It just not working Jason van Zyl also mentioned he was working on

Re: Maven & Continuous Delivery

2016-04-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
I share your concern. We could fix the concern if we created the transformed pom on disk so that things like GPG signatures were generated correctly, but AIUI the issue there was that the pom could not be put in target as that would break relative paths. I suspect this is also related to the issue