On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
> > Hmm. I understand what ClassLoader.getResources(path) returns (just read
> > the javadoc). However, if I have a bunch of independently developed
> > components that are assembled as WAR overlays,
On 16 April 2013 17:57, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 4/16/2013 9:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> On 16 April 2013 17:25, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>
>> Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 April 2013 16:19, Ma
On 4/16/2013 9:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 17:25, Mark Eggers wrote:
Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
wha
It can be as simple as a jar artifact that has one file:
META-INF/plexus/components.xml
For an example of the content of such a components.xml
https://github.com/jszip/jszip-maven-plugin/blob/master/src/main/resources/META-INF/plexus/components.xml
(yes that is in a plugin, but the packaging co
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> perhaps even defining a new packaging type so that I can
> just go eggers-war
>
I have a similar requirement and never thought about the packaging type;
what a great idea! Where is the documentation that
On 16 April 2013 17:25, Mark Eggers wrote:
> Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
>
>
> On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>
>> On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
>>>
>>> what needs concatenating? there is
Comments in-line, and some of the original trimmed . . .
On 4/16/2013 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular
these
days.
Some properties
+1
Very well put!
On 16/04/2013 11:54 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular
these
days.
Some properties files. I could possibly remove the pro
On 16 April 2013 16:19, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
>
>> what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular
>> these
>> days.
>>
>
> Some properties files. I could possibly remove the properties files issue
> by either having the developers
On 4/16/2013 2:31 AM, Richard Vowles wrote:
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular these
days.
Some properties files. I could possibly remove the properties files
issue by either having the developers hand craft them for each project,
or design a new modular con
what needs concatenating? there isnt much designed to be anti-modular these
days.
On Apr 16, 2013 6:56 PM, "Mark Eggers" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to Maven, and I'm trying to meet the following requirements.
>
> 1. A web site consisting of multiple components, some optional
> 2. Optional co
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013, Mark Eggers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to Maven, and I'm trying to meet the following requirements.
>
> 1. A web site consisting of multiple components, some optional
> 2. Optional components each have some configuration files
> 3. If multiple optional components ar
Hi,
I'm fairly new to Maven, and I'm trying to meet the following requirements.
1. A web site consisting of multiple components, some optional
2. Optional components each have some configuration files
3. If multiple optional components are present, the configuration files
should be concatenat
13 matches
Mail list logo
