2009/7/1 Ceki Gulcu :
> Using Maven 2.2.0, the behavior remains the same as with Maven
> 2.0.9. Moreover, if you remove the dependency on
> net.sf.ehcache:ehcache:1.6.0 from the pom file for "htmlunitbug", then
> the test passes (with the original pom files for hibernate-ehcache
> hibernate-parent
Using Maven 2.2.0, the behavior remains the same as with Maven
2.0.9. Moreover, if you remove the dependency on
net.sf.ehcache:ehcache:1.6.0 from the pom file for "htmlunitbug", then
the test passes (with the original pom files for hibernate-ehcache
hibernate-parent referencing commons-logging v
I forgot to mention that my tests were conducted using Maven 2.0.9. I will redo
the tests with Maven 2.2.0.
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Lucas Bergman wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
That is your problem. What this does is mess the dependency-tree. It
removes commons-logging from the dependency tree
Lucas Bergman wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
That is your problem. What this does is mess the dependency-tree. It
removes commons-logging from the dependency tree because that
version "99.0-..." is larger than the latest current release of
commons-logging. The "99.0-..." version should *neve
Lucas Bergman wrote at Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 21:49:
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> Lucas Bergman wrote:
>> > Running this test with Maven 2.1.0 fails:
>> >
>> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory
>> > [ ... ]
>> >
>> > The POM for htmlunit 2.5 declares commons
Rusty Wright wrote at Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2009 00:15:
> This may be a dumb or inappropriate question, but why does Tomcat need
> commons logging? Why can't it just use java util logging?
Who did mention Tomcat in this thread? And no, recent versions of Tomcat use
their own logging framework JULI w
This may be a dumb or inappropriate question, but why does Tomcat need commons
logging? Why can't it just use java util logging?
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ceki,
Ceki Gulcu wrote at Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 16:45:
Jörg Schaible wrote:
You've been right, I should have read your question clos
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Lucas Bergman wrote:
> > Running this test with Maven 2.1.0 fails:
> >
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > The POM for htmlunit 2.5 declares commons-logging 1.1.1 as a
> > (compile-scope) dependency, so this seem
Hi Ceki,
Ceki Gulcu wrote at Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 16:45:
>
>
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> You've been right, I should have read your question closer. See Dennis'
>> answer. Actually there was an attempt to release an official empty
>> commons-logging at Apache recently and it was tunred down
Jörg Schaible wrote:
You've been right, I should have read your question closer. See Dennis'
answer. Actually there was an attempt to release an official empty
commons-logging at Apache recently and it was tunred down exactly because
we could foresee this problem you're facing now :-/
Note t
Lucas Bergman wrote at Montag, 29. Juni 2009 18:11:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Lucas Bergman wrote:
>> > Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> > > Lucas Bergman wrote:
>> > > > Running this test with Maven 2.1.0 fails:
>> > > >
>> > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> > > > org/apache/commons/logging/
Lucas Bergman wrote:
> I ran into a strange dependency resolution problem at work, which a
> colleague and I whittled down to a fairly simple test case. Consider
> the following POM:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
>xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Lucas Bergman wrote:
> > Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > > Lucas Bergman wrote:
> > > > Running this test with Maven 2.1.0 fails:
> > > >
> > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory
> > > > [ ... ]
> > > >
> > > > The POM for htmlu
Lucas Bergman wrote at Montag, 29. Juni 2009 15:25:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Lucas Bergman wrote:
>> > Running this test with Maven 2.1.0 fails:
>> >
>> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> > org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory
>> > [ ... ]
>> >
>> > The POM for htmlunit 2.5 declares
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Lucas Bergman wrote:
> > Running this test with Maven 2.1.0 fails:
> >
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > The POM for htmlunit 2.5 declares commons-logging 1.1.1 as a
> > (compile-scope) dependency, so t
Lucas Bergman wrote:
> I ran into a strange dependency resolution problem at work, which a
> colleague and I whittled down to a fairly simple test case. Consider
> the following POM:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
>xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>
I ran into a strange dependency resolution problem at work, which a
colleague and I whittled down to a fairly simple test case. Consider
the following POM:
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http:/
17 matches
Mail list logo
