I read Vincent Massol's PPT dated 15 September 2005. He said, Short answer:
No.
But, that was 5 months ago! How about now?
I have a major set of J2EE apps that are mostly all in m1, with a few
stragglers in Ant. I will be going through these, externalizing the
environmental dependencies from i
Safe rollercoaster with insurance. ;-)
On 2/14/06, Ray Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I read Vincent Massol's PPT dated 15 September 2005. He said, Short
> answer:
> No.
>
> But, that was 5 months ago! How about now?
>
> I have a major set of J2EE apps that are mostly all in m1, with a few
On 2/15/06, Ray Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read Vincent Massol's PPT dated 15 September 2005. He said, Short answer:
> No.
>
> But, that was 5 months ago! How about now?
Well, in September, it wasn't final, so probably fair enough.
There was a long discussion on this list a little more
The only thing I'd add is that the IDE extensions are not as mature as those
for M1. Although I run the Eclipse extension (m2eclipse.codehaus.org) I am
not really satisfied with it. It's pretty easy to use the mvn
eclipse:eclipse command, though, to keep your .classpath and .project up to
date and
I use Maven 2.0 in production and I am quite satisfied. I haven't run
in a lot of bugs. The documentation can look a little bit sparsed but
there is a good wiki and this list is pretty active and helpful and
Maven 2.0 is very intuitive in my opionion.
But like Kathryn said the IDE integration isn'
ist
Subject: Re: m2 -- Ready for Prime Time, yet?
I use Maven 2.0 in production and I am quite satisfied. I haven't run
in a lot of bugs. The documentation can look a little bit sparsed but
there is a good wiki and this list is pretty active and helpful and
Maven 2.0 is very intuitive in my
Maven 2 is great and stable for the basic things.
If you wanna do exotic things you might have to resort to the antrun
plugin (for purposes like the maven 1 maven.xml).
The eclipse plugin in maven 2 work well to generate configuration.
The idea plugin in maven 2 works well if you use the snaps
I'll second the Kudos to the team! -K
On 2/14/06 6:56 PM, "Alexandre Poitras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use Maven 2.0 in production and I am quite satisfied. I haven't run
> in a lot of bugs. The documentation can look a little bit sparsed but
> there is a good wiki and this list is pretty
On 2/14/06, Ray Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read Vincent Massol's PPT dated 15 September 2005. He said, Short answer:
> No.
>
> But, that was 5 months ago! How about now?
>
> I have a major set of J2EE apps that are mostly all in m1, with a few
> stragglers in Ant. I will be going throug
--
From: Ray Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:56 PM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: m2 -- Ready for Prime Time, yet?
I read Vincent Massol's PPT dated 15 September 2005. He said, Short
answer: No.
But, that was 5 months ago! How about now?
I have a m
904 3629 Office
732 692 4419 Cell
-Original Message-
From: jerome lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:42 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: m2 -- Ready for Prime Time, yet?
On 2/14/06, Ray Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read Vincent
jerome lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:42 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: m2 -- Ready for Prime Time, yet?
>
> On 2/14/06, Ray Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I read Vincent Massol's PPT dated 15 September 2005. He
12 matches
Mail list logo
