This is not exactly what you need but something that I did to get around a
similar problem:
SshClient client = SshClient.setUpDefaultClient();
// Get the current default list of key exchange factories
List keyExchangeFactories =
client.getKeyExchangeFactories();
// Add the Diff
Please disregard this issue as I have gotten it to work, and if you read this
thanks for reading.
Jon
From: Jon Madsen
Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 3:25 PM
To: users@mina.apache.org
Subject: Client support for Diffie-Hellman-group1-sha1 key exchange
Hi all,
I am working on a product
mat("Client session KEX: %s", kex.getName(;
return client;
}
Thanks,
Jon
Internal
I retract my previous statement after pulling the source for
CircularQueue. Guess I'm used to doing illegal things in Java I forget
that most code isn't like that.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Jon V. wrote:
> It looks like a Mina crash to me. Probably some kind of Unsafe ac
It looks like a Mina crash to me. Probably some kind of Unsafe access.
Can you tell us the exact version of Mina?
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> seems like I have hard time moderating your message to the users
> mailinglist... Never mind. here is a copy
I’ll try to simplify; TCP (the protocol) can have up to 0x ports or
65535
Ports only need to be reserved for server services and outbound
connections. They both use the same pool size of 65535. Each OS type
allocates different range for user-space applications. For linux its
around 32768 po
Probably creating the connections too quickly? make the TCP backlog
larger. Default is 10 I believe; I use 100 in production.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Liu, Li (Nokia - CN/Hangzhou) <
li@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi Mina
>
> I try to use Mina to handle multiple TCP’s connections
>
> But t
,
> sslFilter);
> > return sslFilter;
> > }
> >
> >
> > Sure, with a lot of time, I could possibly rewrite the code, to swap the
> positions of the filters in the filterchain.
> >
> > But I see little sense in it, since the code is w
Its my understanding that Read and Write operations are thread-safe and
should never cause deadlocks. (not sure why there are locks in those
filters)
Also, I don’t think SSL should be after Proxy. You cannot initiate an SSL
session if you proxy the setup routine. What is the goal in this setup?
After the message is converted to ByteBuffer is the WriteRequest triggered
or it a child WriteRequest created for the ByteBuffer? That would define
if this kind of callback would be possible.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Le 02/02/16 12:10, Abhijit Bhatode a écrit :
to me more like a fundamental flow problem of filter
modifications than a design issue with SSL filter.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Le 28/01/16 15:37, Jon V. a écrit :
> > Sorry, I hit enter and my email sent.
> >
> > IoFilterChain filte
orkarounds.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Jon V. wrote:
> Sounds to me like someone has a secondary filterchain they are trying to
> prime artificially.
>
> So then maybe this isn’t necessary?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
&
Sounds to me like someone has a secondary filterchain they are trying to
prime artificially.
So then maybe this isn’t necessary?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Le 28/01/16 15:30, Jon V. a écrit :
> > In what scenario would the SSL filter be attache
In what scenario would the SSL filter be attached but the session has no
filterchain
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Le 28/01/16 13:33, Norbert Irmer a écrit :
> > Your idea, adding a method "public void initiateHandshake(IoSession
> session)" to the SslFilter class,
Its been a while since I’ve used Mina and I forgot how the processor model
works.
Can anyone confirm the diagram is correct?
Here https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mina.git;a=summary
You can choose which HEAD you want. trunk is 2 years old so I wouldn’t
look at that.
Here is the “2.0” HEAD
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mina.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/2.0;hb=refs/heads/2.0
Its 4 days old.
On Tue,
Here is the browser for the filters package
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mina.git;a=tree;f=mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter;hb=d0263e8a00cf6e60d18317d1e8899554c53083bc
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Le 22/12/15 05:30, Vic Cekvenich a écr
ot; wrote:
> Hi, Jon!
> Thak you for information about IoProcessors. If there are already
> cores*2 IoProcessors, than things change much. It seems, that executor
> filter is useless at all if a server doesn't perform any waiting/sleeping,
> etc. It seems, that executor filter
lel?
> 7 окт. 2015 г. 10:18 PM пользователь "Jon V."
> написал:
>
> > You also cannot process a linear buffer simultaneously. TCP is linear
> and
> > reading the messages must be linear. After you have a list of messages
> > then you may execute them in parallel
You also cannot process a linear buffer simultaneously. TCP is linear and
reading the messages must be linear. After you have a list of messages
then you may execute them in parallel but the line decoding of the buffer
must be single threaded. The decoder operates on an inbound buffer and
multi-
Emmanuel is correct. You have to manage that backlog. Mina provides write
request handlers so you get notifications when the data is written. If you
detect that data isn't writing you should take steps to mitigate sending
data to that session.
On Sep 1, 2015 12:01 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote:
>
Maybe the file should be locked until send is complete. Really shouldn't
allow sending of a file while it is being modified.
On May 15, 2015 5:31 PM, "Charlie Kim"
wrote:
> Hi there, I'm seeing EOFException when file gets modified during sendFile
> command.
> Here is the scenario. Client receiv
Mina is a networking framework for building web services. It is not a web
service itself.
On May 13, 2015 5:50 AM, "Jochen Seliger"
wrote:
> Hi,
> I need a functionality to let qasi any mashine, running our
> client-programm, to
> connect to a central instance.
> Therefor the HTTP Update header
Ghost sessions are a result of a broken TCP connection. It is possible
that the client lost internet connection and was unable to correctly
terminate the TCP session. Therefore, your application will never get a
TCP close until the default idleness timer invokes or you use Mina's
internal idlenes
that we can take decision.
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Jon V. wrote:
>
> > Write and read is only the real way to detect disconnect. Sockets can be
> > valid and live on after a disconnect and reconnect.
> >
> > When a network cable is removed, you may g
Write and read is only the real way to detect disconnect. Sockets can be
valid and live on after a disconnect and reconnect.
When a network cable is removed, you may get a disconnect after the OS
internal timeout. Otherwise you have to rely on your own idleness timer.
On Apr 17, 2015 6:28 AM, "Ni
the job.
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:06 PM Jon V. wrote:
>
> > This is not the correct place to discuss this. Maybe try stack overflow.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 AM, rkreddy.bogati <
> rkreddy.bog...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
This is not the correct place to discuss this. Maybe try stack overflow.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 AM, rkreddy.bogati
wrote:
> @Ukslim, Thanks for your response.
>
> Let me explain the details requirement.
>
> I have one IP Address (that is not connected to any physical machine),
> which
>
This isn't necessarily something that would be the responsibility of Mina.
Just as you developed your own game server, you will have to add any kind
of clustering features yourself.
On Mar 24, 2015 11:16 AM, "antares" wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> i created a game server and i would like to have a sugge
Glad you figured it out.
On Mar 22, 2015 6:39 PM, "Jianbao (Jim) Tao" wrote:
> Thank you, Jon and Emmanuel. I tried adding a logging filter and all. I
> finally found the root cause by taking a thread dump. It was due to a
> deadlock in our business logic code.
>
> I tri
I am going to take a little leap and say that Java is probably not the best
to develop a proxy application. Mina's design is also more optimized for
request response type situations and may introduce some unnecessary latency
into the proxy.
Otherwise, it is just as Emmanuel said. You write all th
We are going to need a lot more. I would first use visual VM and figure if
any threads are running 100% and grab stack traces.
On Mar 21, 2015 3:03 PM, "Jianbao (Jim) Tao" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing a issue as follows.
>
> We have a proxy server developed with Mina. Recently after some changes
How are you interrupting during SSL handshake?
On Feb 9, 2015 4:04 AM, "Ing. Jan Kaláb" wrote:
> The version is 2.0.9.
>
> I can't provide you the whole code, only what's in the question on
> StackOverflow, but the JMeter plan is attached. Maybe if you ask more
> precisly about part of the code y
It may be a flaw in the redesign. The trunk is an entire redesign of Mina.
On Aug 16, 2014 4:04 PM, "Kai ZHANG" wrote:
> If the write() should be synchronized by myself, why the API documentation
> says this class is thread safe?
>
> I added my application details and the explanations in another
y two threads without any
> synchronization mechanism.
>
> On 08/17/2014 02:59 AM, Jon V. wrote:
>
>> It is my understanding that the write is occurring on the the selector
>> loop. This occurs on the same selector loop every time and therefore is
>> thread-safe. When yo
It is my understanding that the write is occurring on the the selector
loop. This occurs on the same selector loop every time and therefore is
thread-safe. When you call write the params are encapsulated and triggered
for execution on the select loop. It does not occur in the same stack as
the call
> Le 15/08/14 16:06, Jon V. a écrit :
> > If you receive 5 bytes then Mina will trigger through the schedule
> > mechanism which means it gets queued and a thread wakes up to process
> that.
> > That wakeup is one of the most expensive parts of the process. How often
>
for the parsers it is much more simple and cost effective to buffer the
XML before processing it.
On Aug 15, 2014 3:29 AM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote:
> Le 15/08/14 08:15, Jon V. a écrit :
> > Yes, if the iohandle is blocking the execution then that would obviously
> do
>
number of
messages.
On Aug 15, 2014 2:00 AM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote:
> Le 15/08/14 05:41, Jon V. a écrit :
> > Emmanuel, is there a line test tool for Mina? I ask because seems like
> the
> > Jedi Jin here has a throughput problem.
>
> Something like
>
> http:
Emmanuel, is there a line test tool for Mina? I ask because seems like the
Jedi Jin here has a throughput problem.
Jin,
Have you tried benchmarking your code directly? In all reality I process
30k sockets and 500mb/s using raw TCP in java so if there is a problem it
is either your code or Mina.
H
This isn't really a Mina question.
Seems like you need to work on some tests to find out what parts are the
bottleneck. I don't know why a buffer would mean faster inserts. Buffers
are good to offload the tasks to other threads and that has its own
performance advantages depending on how your dat
You could simply try the write or read on an interval. There are a few
scenarios where aio is use able without NIO. Primarily when you use
blocking read and scheduled non blocking writes.
On Apr 19, 2014 9:58 AM, "Alon Bar-Lev" wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Jon V. wrote
NIO controls and deals with the selectors. Async IO is a part of that but
is not the same thing. Async io means that if a write cannot be fully
flushed. It will not block until it can be. NIO provides us the events to
tell us that data is available in the socket.
On Apr 19, 2014 4:56 AM, "Alon Bar-
I am probably not the best person to comment on this.
It is my understanding that mina3 is still in active development. There is
no official release. You shouldn't build production apps with it unless you
are willing to build and go through an extensive testing process.
Hi guys,
I would like to m
TCP works perfectly. If there is a problem. It is elsewhere.
Implementing message delivery confirmation is a part of a higher level
protocol. If the network/TCP is connected; it will be delivered.
In what environment are you expecting TCP sockets to close all the time?
Here is what happening reg
You are converting an incoming iobuffer to byte[] you need to write an
iobuffer.
On Mar 12, 2014 11:34 AM, "dinesh707" wrote:
> As shown below I can read the byte[] sent from an IoSession without having
> a
> protocol decoder.
>
> IoBuffer in = (IoBuffer) message;
> byte[] inBytes = in.array();
>
not volatile and must be synchronized to ensure that the positioning is
correct.
Semaphore's current count is also non volatile; that is how it quickly
decides in the tryLock() phase.
To recap, it may work but should be tested extensively.
-Jon
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Mondain
Instead of relying on logging; I would setup a stress test to measure
completed commands/s and use that as a foundation for trying other
procedures.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Max Larsson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>
> >>
>
>> In my IoHandler i receive the desired message and write out the res
You should never assume that all of your data is available. If you work
with this, you can handle any speed client. I test everything against
simulated invalid packets and random latency.
On Nov 25, 2013 9:38 AM, "Andrew Pennebaker" wrote:
> This is a good edge case to consider, as some script ki
I was thinking about the Http lib. I didn't remember a proxy in there.
Thanks.
On Nov 22, 2013 3:32 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote:
> Le 11/22/13 9:20 PM, Jon V. a écrit :
> > I imagine you could build a proxy in Mina. However I don't believe any
> > prebuilt p
crawler. Would be nice to spin up proxy servers, to test proxy
> support in the crawler.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jon V. wrote:
>
> > I don't see why not. I wouldn't recommend it however.
> >
> > Proxy servers need to be more bare metal.
>
I don't see why not. I wouldn't recommend it however.
Proxy servers need to be more bare metal.
Nginx has a proxy module you should look at.
On Nov 22, 2013 11:59 AM, "Andrew Pennebaker" wrote:
> That would be cool!
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew Pennebaker
> apenneba...@42six.com
>
I would imagine this to be true. The normal use case is request and
response. Additional synchronization makes the code run slower in that
scenario. I would suggest synchronizing critical paths.
I have to synchronize write paths for the same reason where one input may
write to dozens of other sock
e
> for writing, is brutal. I am thinking on including a writing lock as a
> session attribute in each session that will be initialized on
> sessionCreated events.
>
> Cheers!
> Alex
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Jon V. wrote:
>
> > I would imag
5-10 at a time; I am
sure it would work normally.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Jon V. wrote:
> I've seen this before and it was tightly bound to the Acceptor backlog for
> me. My desktop is Win 2008 r2 and I can get 18,000 tcp connections in Java.
>
> Selectors for some re
8 on
Linux; there is a significant performance problem with greater than 3 on
Windows.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 9/30/13 8:52 AM, Jon V. a écrit :
> > NioSocketAcceptor( number ) creates N threads. > 10 is a problem in most
> > cases. Th
NioSocketAcceptor( number ) creates N threads. > 10 is a problem in most
cases. The default backlog for a SocketAcceptor in Java is 50. I have
mine set to 200 to prevent dropped "accept" requests. Each time a socket
attempts to connect it gets put in the backlog waiting for an "accept" to
be ca
Try increasing the backlog on the acceptor.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:31 AM, praveen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the same problem with the mina server. I am running on windows 2008
> with 32 cores.Once the connections is established i need to send the reply
> back in 3 seconds
Depends on what aspect of asynchronous you are looking for. The sockets are
always async. If you have a bunch of ioprocessors then you have
concurrency where more than one message can be processed at any given time.
On Sep 25, 2013 6:15 AM, "Christian Hammers" wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2
The first thing I would do would be to disable the executor and try again.
You could be encountering some sort of deadlock.
On Sep 24, 2013 12:47 PM, "Christian Hammers"
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've written a server for a proprietary UDP protocol that needs to answer
> with
> exactly one packet for ev
or.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
>
> But it drops messages. The SumUp example does not seem to drop messages
> when I changed it to use the ObjectSerializationCodecFactory but I will
> have to verify that.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jo
On the client you are writing a hashmap to the session. I don't see a
filter which turns the hashmap into a IoBuffer? Only IoBuffer can be
written to the socket directly.
On Sep 16, 2013 1:12 PM, "Karrys, Michael (IS)" wrote:
> I was wondering if someone could look at this and tell me what I am
on the horizon?
>
> --Mark
>
>
> On Sep 4, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Jon V. wrote:
>
>> The http implementation hasn't received any love lately as far as I know.
>> It is not for needing a bit of work. Why not take the code and integrate it
>> yourself? WebSoc
The http implementation hasn't received any love lately as far as I know.
It is not for needing a bit of work. Why not take the code and integrate it
yourself? WebSockets are not terribly complicated.
On Sep 4, 2013 11:36 AM, "Mark Phillips" wrote:
> The Users and Dev list archives contain year-
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Jon V. [mailto:sybersn...@gmail.com]
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 2 de setembro de 2013 23:54
> Para: users@mina.apache.org
> Assunto: Re: Send/Receive IoBuffer
>
> This is better: I am not going to use the correct API but you can get th
Fix
if( buffering == null )
{
buffering = ByteBuffer.allocate( some size );
session.setAtribute( SOME_PROPERTY_BUFFER_NAME, buffering );
}
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Jon V. wrote:
> This is better: I am not going to use the correct API but you can get the
> idea.
>
> Cre
"return" if you don't have enough data.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Jon V. wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Luciano Coelho
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah Jon, you're right about flush, the wrong thing is really the
>> IoBuffer.
>>
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> Yeah Jon, you're right about flush, the wrong thing is really the IoBuffer.
> I put the: session.getConfig().setReadBufferSize(16*1024), on connector as
> you told me.
>
> I changed now for what you answered me, like t
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
>
>
> I'm learning how to use Mina and my questions are:
>
>
>
> I solved my problem of having a answer from my server without closing the
> session like this:
>
>
>
> System.out.flush();
>
This really gives me an indicat
ll events waiting to be processed.
>
> Filter chain looks like this:
> * codec
> * inbound-filter (executor filter for all but WRITE events)
> * write-throttle-filter (overrides filterWrite)
> * outbound-filter (executor filter for WRITE events only)
> On 08/23/2013 12:32 PM,
What is the use case for having different thread pools for read and write
events?
Writes are already scheduled one they hit the worker. Not like your write
process is going to slow down an already threaded read request.
On Aug 22, 2013 5:52 PM, "Mike McKnight" wrote:
> I am just curious if there
Please don't take this the wrong way. The apache Mina site is full of
examples and documentation. That should be your primary source of
information before asking questions on the email list.
Remember, this list covers 5 different projects and your email goes out to
a lot of people.
I am very happ
This is against the design.
You could add this into the source pretty easy and build a custom version of
Mina.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 8, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Nick_ wrote:
> I can't seem to find a way to allow each connection to have it's own handler
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in co
r the handler will basically be in messageReceived?
> And the state machine manages sessionCreated()/**sessionOpened()?
>
>
> Hunter
> On 8/7/2013 3:29 PM, Jon V. wrote:
>
>> That is basically how it is done.
>>
>> Io->packet processor->state machine->han
Millen" wrote:
> So that is actually the solution we had before, but the state machine was
> in an authentication filter, we had a lot of trouble transitioning from "ok
> now I am done authenticating, I want to be in my IoHandler now"
>
> Hunter
> On 8/7/2013 3:03 PM,
of the commands that a user could enter.
>
> Hunter
> On 8/7/2013 1:13 PM, Jon wrote:
>> You must be building some sort of communication format for it.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Hunter McMillen wrote:
>>
>>> We&
ers
> at a time.
>
> Hunter
> On 8/7/2013 12:02 PM, Jon wrote:
>> This is more of a protocol implementation than a networking question. What
>> kind of protocol are you implementing.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2013, at 11:34
This is more of a protocol implementation than a networking question. What
kind of protocol are you implementing.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Hunter McMillen wrote:
> We actually won't need anything as complex as LDAP, just a simple DB hash +
> salt lookup.
>
> Hunter
The major problem with any kind of ordering is the blocking and major
performance problems relative to the load.
On Aug 1, 2013 9:55 PM, "Ashish" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Jon V. wrote:
>
> > To my knowledge the executor filter does not guarantee any kind of
emachine), we simply want to pass that to our handler.
>
> Thanks.
> Hunter
>
> On 8/1/13 9:54 PM, Ashish wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Jon V. wrote:
> >
> >> To my knowledge the executor filter does not guarantee any kind of
> order.
> >>
; can post the code for these also, I just didn't want to overload the
> thread.
>
> Thanks.
> Hunter
> On 8/1/13 5:47 PM, Jon wrote:
> > You are not using an executor filter right? You have to implement
> locking during the authentication phase if you are using thread s
You are not using an executor filter right? You have to implement locking
during the authentication phase if you are using thread scheduling.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Hunter McMillen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently started working on a project with a friend that is a te
gt; Thanks And Regards,
> Nitin Phuria
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon V. [mailto:sybersn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 12:27 AM
> To: users@mina.apache.org; nit...@integramicro.com
> Subject: Re: Does MINA 2.0.4 supports IPV6
>
> Are you using wild
Are you using wildcards in the blacklist filter? You could build your own
string and pattern based blacklist filter for IPV6 in under 30 minutes.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Nitin Phuria wrote:
> The issue is registered in JIRA see the below link.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DI
To the MINA mailing list owner. Can we setup a rule requiring the project
name in the subject line? e.g. [MINA] , [SSHD]
Just create an ipv6 socket address object for use when binding the socket. It
is really no different than v4
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 19, 2013, at 12:06 AM, "Nitin Phuria" wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
>I want following information about MINA Framework Version 2.0.4
> as we have crea
You could have used the executor filter to do this. All depends on the lengths
you want to go through for difference performance profiles.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Zlatko Josic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We created server based on MINA framework. Every request has logic that
>
Someone can correct me if I am wrong but this probably happens with a self
signed certificate. They are anonymous by nature because no certificate
authority will certify it.
Sent from my iPad
On May 24, 2013, at 8:52 AM, "Rajiv Kasera" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using SSLFilter for enabling SSL
1) You obtain the next filter and call messageReceived there. Mina will
automatically wrap the last filter and call the handler.
2) nextFilter.filterWrite(session, new DefaultWriteRequest(out,
writeRequest.getFuture(), writeRequest.getDestination()));
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Max Larsson
Data-->Filters-->Handler
Filters are pretty much the same as a handler just they can be stacked
horizontally and there is only one handler.
--
Jon V
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Max Larsson wrote:
> Hi
This is simple. Two filters. One for handshake one for protocol. After
handshake is done. Disable the first through some session variable.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 4/17/13 5:17 PM, Max Larsson a écrit :
>> Hi,
> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using MINA
+1 for great analogy.
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 3/1/13 9:50 AM, Tejas Patel a écrit :
> > Problem :
> >
> > When i transmit the byte array of [56, 34, 0, 4, -79, 1] from one device to
> > another device on using Apache Camel Mina UDP endpoint, at rece
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/mina/mina/2.0.7/apache-mina-2.0.7-src.zip
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Lei Ma wrote:
> Thank you Jon.
>
> How do I download the mina-http project?
>
> I git cloned the following and the http encoder/decoder doesn't
Basic http support is in the Mina-http project. You have to download the
sources and build the library.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Lei Ma wrote:
> I need it to support HTTP.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Lei
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:elec
I'm looking for how Mina is determining a close from NIO. Since NIO does not
have any direct method to detect closure.(without calling write/read and
getting a -1)
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> > Le 1/18/13 2:
Emmanuel,
I am trying to find out how Mina is detecting Session closures for 2.0.7.
Source searches do not seem to help. Can you point me in the right direction?
--
Jon V
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-929
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Arnaud bourree wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA
>
> 2013/1/3 Jon V. :
> > JIRA location?
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny >wrote:
> &
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 1/3/13 4:50 PM, Jon V. a écrit :
> > I am trying to patch a bug in the IoBuffer caching and it won't build
> > unless I remove the tests from the pom.xml
>
> Hi,
>
> can you provide a bit more info
JIRA location?
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 1/3/13 5:12 PM, Jon V. a écrit :
> > Sorry that this is the entire file. I don't have it checked out with
> > subversion to create typical patches.
> >
> > Basically, there are t
Sorry that this is the entire file. I don't have it checked out with
subversion to create typical patches.
Basically, there are two places where I call free() to release the IoBuffer
memory.
The CachedBufferAllocator is totally broken but I am able to get 100%
recycled Buffers with a custom impl
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
